New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

USA Must Divide Into 2 Seperate Countries

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Why don't you libbies post in a new thread, that is up to date, instead of off topic posting in one that's a year old ? Cowardice ?
You re-opened this thread with your post #8 and are now criticizing others for answering you. Is your short term memory really that bad?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Or how about the peaceful division of Hungary into Bosnia, Serbia and Croatia...that went really well.
On the "Other" Side, a Biographer of Ron Paul Claimed That Rockefeller Was Ford's Running Mate.

You mean Yugoslavia. Smug know-it-alls are too lazy to be accurate. Besides, no head of state is going to intervene like Clinton did in the irrelevant case you mentioned. I can't see Liberal girlymen or their wild Low-IQ pet minorities being able to violently force us to re-join your Convoy to Nowhere.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
On the "Other" Side, a Biographer of Ron Paul Claimed That Rockefeller Was Ford's Running Mate.

You mean Yugoslavia. Smug know-it-alls are too lazy to be accurate. Besides, no head of state is going to intervene like Clinton did in the irrelevant case you mentioned. I can't see Liberal girlymen or their wild Low-IQ pet minorities being able to violently force us to re-join your Convoy to Nowhere.
my bad...thanks for the correction.
 

protectionist

Governor
1. Post #2 and #3 were both from 2020.
2. Your quiz is crap. That is why nobody is spending time on it.
My Quiz is what you are scared stiff of. Run rabbit, run.

You're afraid of being exposed for having bad policies.

And it's not even really a "quiz". I just couldn't think of what else to call it. All you have to do is state true or false for each item.

Cowards.
 

protectionist

Governor
NATION - a stable, historically developed community of people with a territory, economic life, distinctive culture, and language in common. (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.)

This is why the US will never be a nation. If it seperates into a blue US and a red US, each of those will be nations.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
NATION - a stable, historically developed community of people with a territory, economic life, distinctive culture, and language in common. (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.)

This is why the US will never be a nation. If it seperates into a blue US and a red US, each of those will be nations.
And then all you need to do is force Democrats to move out of red states because most republicans will stay right where they are....You could force democrats in red states to wear a big "D" on their coats...confiscate their property, make it illegal for them to have jobs or bank accounts.... Sounds good, herr Untergruppenfuhrer...

Dumb idea.
 

protectionist

Governor
And then all you need to do is force Democrats to move out of red states because most republicans will stay right where they are....You could force democrats in red states to wear a big "D" on their coats...confiscate their property, make it illegal for them to have jobs or bank accounts.... Sounds good, herr Untergruppenfuhrer...

Dumb idea.
Clear cut display of how liberals are unable to see things in focus, and instead conjure up some wackadoodle notion of those things. Nobody is thinking any of those things except you.

I would suspect many Democrats in red states would move to the blue US. Many Republicans in blue states would move to the red US. I moved from California to Florida, and drove a car all the way. For most people it would be a lot easier than that.
No big deal.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Clear cut display of how liberals are unable to see things in focus, and instead conjure up some wackadoodle notion of those things. Nobody is thinking any of those things except you.

I would suspect many Democrats in red states would move to the blue US. Many Republicans in blue states would move to the red US. I moved from California to Florida, and drove a car all the way. For most people it would be a lot easier than that.
No big deal.
That wackadoodle notion comes from reading your crap. You suspect that people would move from Colorado (a blue state) to Alabama or Mississippi? Why haven't they? They are certainly free to do so now and don't.
 

Gamewell45

Council Member
There simply is no room at all in red state America for Democrats. There can be no compromise. We have had enough. Democrats have GOT TO GO, and the sooner the better. The US map must change, with red states being one country. Blue states being another.

Then, no more friction. No more partisan investigation. No more twists of taxpayer money, and if Democrats want to engage in election fraud, sanctuary cities, tolerance of Islam, affirmative action discrimination, gun free zones, riot/looting tolerance, etc, the only victims will be other Democrats.
Think about this for a second; if, under your scenario, the US was divided into two separate countries, one being red and the other blue, what's to prevent the blue countries from forming alliances with China and/or Russia? And lets say as part of that alliance, the blue states allow a military presence from either/or both countries with the possibility of nuclear weapons being placed on what was formerly American soil. And because the former US is no longer perceived as a big threat that It once was, Mexico, with the help of China decides to "take back Texas"? And then New Mexico and
Arizona, etc. It's much more complex then what we can say, but the point is with the fifty states united, there is strength in numbers, with the states broken up all bets are off.

That's why I'd be opposed to breaking up the union due to political differences; we need to be careful of what we wish for since we might actually get it.
 
Last edited:

God of War

Governor
Think about this for a second; if, under your scenario, the US was divided into two separate countries, one being red and the other blue, what's to prevent the blue countries from forming alliances with China and/or Russia? And lets say as part of that alliance, the blue states allow a military presence from either/or both countries with the possibility of nuclear weapons being placed on what was formerly American soil. And because the former US is no longer perceived as a big threat that I once was, Mexico, with the help of China decides to "take back Texas"? And then New Mexico and
Arizona, etc. It's much more complex then what we can say, but the point is with the fifty states united, there is strength in numbers, with the states broken up all bets are off.

That's why I'd be opposed to breaking up the union due to political differences; we need to be careful of what we wish for since we might actually get it.
It's why under Trump I advocated for Federal troops to take California to arrest the governor, disband the assembly, and under martial law reconstruct the state by first deporting illegal aliens. Sanctuary cities and the advocates for sanctuary for illegal aliens have committed treason.





.
 

protectionist

Governor
Think about this for a second; if, under your scenario, the US was divided into two separate countries, one being red and the other blue, what's to prevent the blue countries from forming alliances with China and/or Russia? And lets say as part of that alliance, the blue states allow a military presence from either/or both countries with the possibility of nuclear weapons being placed on what was formerly American soil. And because the former US is no longer perceived as a big threat that It once was, Mexico, with the help of China decides to "take back Texas"? And then New Mexico and
Arizona, etc. It's much more complex then what we can say, but the point is with the fifty states united, there is strength in numbers, with the states broken up all bets are off.

That's why I'd be opposed to breaking up the union due to political differences; we need to be careful of what we wish for since we might actually get it.
What makes you think that the blue states and Democrats in general are NOT in alliance right now, with China, Iran, Cuba, Mexico, and other enemies of the American people ?

I highly doubt that China or Russia would approve of nuclear weapons being placed in UBSA + we are already under attack from China with biological weaponry (the Covid virus)

The strength in numbers theory is ALWAYS stated whenever a multicultural entity wrongly composed a nation tries to free itself into a true nation with distinct culture.
Mexico need not take back any land from the US. Mexico has already conquered the US, and has been colonizing us for decades with 21st century imperialism (remittances$$$$) and has been raiding our economy for $40 Billion/year (the Vikings would be envious).

Since the Democrats only allow this to secure VOTES from Mexican migrants once the red/blue slit occured, Democrats would no longer have any need for the aliens, and they would close the borders of New Mexico and California.

Like wise the red states of Texas and Arizona would close their borders too. As for Mexico taking military action against UBSA and/or URSA, not in a million years.

Both the URSA and the UBSA are heavily armed with lots of military forts, navy, air force, and nuclear arsenals. There would not be much loss of military strength.
 

Gamewell45

Council Member
What makes you think that the blue states and Democrats in general are NOT in alliance right now, with China, Iran, Cuba, Mexico, and other enemies of the American people ?

I highly doubt that China or Russia would approve of nuclear weapons being placed in UBSA + we are already under attack from China with biological weaponry (the Covid virus)

The strength in numbers theory is ALWAYS stated whenever a multicultural entity wrongly composed a nation tries to free itself into a true nation with distinct culture.
Mexico need not take back any land from the US. Mexico has already conquered the US, and has been colonizing us for decades with 21st century imperialism (remittances$$$$) and has been raiding our economy for $40 Billion/year (the Vikings would be envious).

Since the Democrats only allow this to secure VOTES from Mexican migrants once the red/blue slit occured, Democrats would no longer have any need for the aliens, and they would close the borders of New Mexico and California.

Like wise the red states of Texas and Arizona would close their borders too. As for Mexico taking military action against UBSA and/or URSA, not in a million years.

Both the URSA and the UBSA are heavily armed with lots of military forts, navy, air force, and nuclear arsenals. There would not be much loss of military strength.
Can you point out any signed documentation proving what you maintain by any of the aforementioned states? While we may be under attack from China with biological weapons, once the blue states are kicked out of the union stopping whatever biological attacks that may be occurring would make sense since that would impact them from relocating troops/weapons onto the former US land.

As to strength in numbers, while it may be a theory, try this for size; pick up one pencil, and try and snap it in half. Now pick up 30 pencils and try to snap them in half. If you are even able to snap all of them in half at once you'll find it extremely difficult to accomplish. The same theory applies t to the states.

As to your theory about Mexico, I suggest you read Whitley Striebers/ James Kunetta's book "War Day". Even thought it is fiction, it is viable nonetheless.

Regardless I do stand by my viewpoint.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Clear cut display of how liberals are unable to see things in focus, and instead conjure up some wackadoodle notion of those things. Nobody is thinking any of those things except you.

I would suspect many Democrats in red states would move to the blue US. Many Republicans in blue states would move to the red US. I moved from California to Florida, and drove a car all the way. For most people it would be a lot easier than that.
No big deal.
There simply is no room at all in red state America for Democrats.

So you'd advocate for forcing people who don't belong to the republican party to surrender their property and leave your new Red America? Is Russia as powerful as it was as the USSR? No.

So when you get your way....what if Florida decides they don't like the policies that Alabama or Georgia propose...and they decide to become the Sunshine republic? Iowa, Idaho, North and South Dakota decide to join Canada...

Yeah, what you propose, all to avoid discussions with people who have different ideas than you, is the perfect solution. *Sung to the tune of "Go Your Own Way"....

The truth is there is no room for you here.
 
And then all you need to do is force Democrats to move out of red states because most republicans will stay right where they are....You could force democrats in red states to wear a big "D" on their coats...confiscate their property, make it illegal for them to have jobs or bank accounts.... Sounds good, herr Untergruppenfuhrer...
Voluntary Migration to the Land of Free Stuff, Soft on Crime

As usual, you slant your post by automatically assuming force will be necessary. Just by outlawing education for the children of immigration criminals will get them and their parents to go back where they came from, or to the Blue State union, which is a UN colony anyway.

No welfare, poisoning the drug supply, chain gangs for convicts, etc. will get the Demmies to go where they belong. Besides changing our laws, freely expressed social attitudes will make your Rainbow Bow-wows go where they will be petted lavishly, even if they bite the hand that feeds them.
 
Last edited:
Think about this for a second; if, under your scenario, the US was divided into two separate countries, one being red and the other blue, what's to prevent the blue countries from forming alliances with China and/or Russia? And lets say as part of that alliance, the blue states allow a military presence from either/or both countries with the possibility of nuclear weapons being placed on what was formerly American soil. And because the former US is no longer perceived as a big threat that It once was, Mexico, with the help of China decides to "take back Texas"? And then New Mexico and
Arizona, etc. It's much more complex then what we can say, but the point is with the fifty states united, there is strength in numbers, with the states broken up all bets are off.

That's why I'd be opposed to breaking up the union due to political differences; we need to be careful of what we wish for since we might actually get it.
The Wild Blue Yonder

Completely dishonest scare-stories, which you always hold as a clincher when you can't make any realistic objections.
 
It's why under Trump I advocated for Federal troops to take California to arrest the governor, disband the assembly, and under martial law reconstruct the state by first deporting illegal aliens. Sanctuary cities and the advocates for sanctuary for illegal aliens have committed treason.





.
Disqualifornia

I response I thought of was to disallow their votes in the Electoral College because of that treason.
 
There simply is no room at all in red state America for Democrats.

So you'd advocate for forcing people who don't belong to the republican party to surrender their property and leave your new Red America? Is Russia as powerful as it was as the USSR? No.

So when you get your way....what if Florida decides they don't like the policies that Alabama or Georgia propose...and they decide to become the Sunshine republic? Iowa, Idaho, North and South Dakota decide to join Canada...

Yeah, what you propose, all to avoid discussions with people who have different ideas than you, is the perfect solution. *Sung to the tune of "Go Your Own Way"....

The truth is there is no room for you here.
Blueys Desperately Need Us As Punching Bags

Again you're being whatifficult.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Voluntary Migration to the Land of Free Stuff, Soft on Crime

As usual, you slant your post by automatically assuming force will be necessary. Just by outlawing education for the children of immigration criminals will get them and their parents to go back where they came from, or to the Blue State union, which is a UN colony anyway.

No welfare, poisoning the drug supply, chain gangs for convicts, etc. will get the Demmies to go where they belong. Besides changing our laws, freely expressed social attitudes will make your Rainbow Bow-wows go where they will be petted lavishly, even if they bite the hand that feeds him.
Sure thing...in your rosy scenario you'll find someone to harvest crops, because it certainly won't be you and your red neck pals. So just to update you...FLA would be a red state, Ga would be blue and AZ would be blue. Ohio might be red..not sure.

Clearly you'd be vacationing in a blue state...you'll be buying your planes, computers and cars from blue states...but the hunting will be just peachy in the red states....I'm guessing that you won't have to put up with many college graduates...and you won't have to worry about people always using big words on ya....

1635200334909.png

But then wouldn't places like Dallas, San Antonio and Austin Tx want to secede from republican Texas? Dem Miami wouldn't want to be stuck with republican Tampa....so Fla would split up.

Yeah...it'll look a lot like the USSR breakup...
 
Top