You can say whatever floats your boat. The evidence is the evidence. Not only is rittenhouse retreating throughout.. other than when forced to act. All of your arguments and claims are dispelled by the evidence and the video. And in reality from the moment zeminsky fires everybody's advancing on rittenhouse, not the other way aroundI say the evidence was to the contrary. In support of my position I cite the videos and the evidence.
Compelling argument, no?
;-)
That's pretty compelling. You're just saying it was something else doesn't mean shit. What means shit is the testimony that's now recorded in evidence, the videos that are actually recordings of the event, and the fact of the matter that throughout from the moment is ziminski fired.. rittenhouse is retreating, until he couldn't