Hatemongers working hard to wash that car slaughter off the page

[Dawg]

America. What’s your point?
Zliminski may have been up to no good, he after all did go there and start firing shots for unclear reasons. Grosskreutz and Huber appear to have gone to participate in a peaceful protest as was their first amendment right (and Rittenhouse clearly went there to use his gun to silence that protest).

If the grandmother beater Grosskreutz went to be peaceful why did he take an illegal gun with him and stuff it in the back of his belt?

Now back to Topic Brooks the career criminal murdering scum

 

[PhilFish]

America. What’s your point?
Zliminski may have been up to no good, he after all did go there and start firing shots for unclear reasons. Grosskreutz and Huber appear to have gone to participate in a peaceful protest as was their first amendment right (and Rittenhouse clearly went there to use his gun to silence that protest).

Sure .... Please provide a link

 

[PhilFish]

They were there to peacefully object to police brutality. Rittenhouse was there to violently object to their right to do so. See the difference?

Well, no..because that's not what they did. Threatening to kill someone is t peacefully protesting...it is threatening to kill someone

It's good to see you scoot off to another premise after your distance travelled bs was dismantled

 

[PhilFish]

There is no right to chase people and point guns at them. Nor is there a right for the general populace to use violence in the defense of others’ property. The 1% or so who were burning and stealing were of course breaking the law, but that does not somehow invalidate the right of the other 99% to protest peacefully.

Cool..but it from within that 1% that the issues sprung..the other 99% weren't involved in any way.

And yes..Ziminski et al had no right to chase Rittenhouse. Thanks for asserting that

 

[Dino]

Phil's trying so hard to get you trumpie/repubs to love him.

No one's rushed to his protection.

Yes. Of course you’re wrong. The lefty media are doing what they can to keep his record, his past, his motive and state of mind out of the news. This is yet another covered up BLM act of wanton destructive violence.
Where’s the news at covering his extensive record? Where are they on delivering his social media?

 

[EatTheRich]

I see this is evolving into another Rittenhouse thread.

I suppose some prefer not to discuss Mr. Brooks.

This is a political forum. Since the senseless attack of a deranged individual with no political motive holds no political interest in and of itself, people interested in discussing politics find it revealing to see the double standard with how this attack is treated in contrast to how Rittenhouse’s attack was treated.

 

[EatTheRich]

If the grandmother beater Grosskreutz went to be peaceful why did he take an illegal gun with him and stuff it in the back of his belt?

Now back to Topic Brooks the career criminal murdering scum

“If you want peace, you have to be willing to fight for it.”-Huey P. Newton (?)

 

[EatTheRich]

Sure .... Please provide a link

A link to what?

 

[EatTheRich]

Well, no..because that's not what they did. Threatening to kill someone is t peacefully protesting...it is threatening to kill someone

It's good to see you scoot off to another premise after your distance travelled bs was dismantled

They didn’t go there to threaten to kill Rittenhouse … one guy threatened to kill Rittenhouse after he showed up and started chasing him and his friends and pointing his gun at them. He did show up to threaten to kill anyone who dared protest the police brutality. See the difference?

 

[Dawg]

“If you want peace, you have to be willing to fight for it.”-Huey P. Newton (?)

I know that very well, but, there's a hellofa difference from fighting for peace and being peaceful at a protest/riot..........

It's clear you have book learning but have no common sense.

 

[Dawg]

They didn’t go there to threaten to kill Rittenhouse … one guy threatened to kill Rittenhouse after he showed up and started chasing him and his friends and pointing his gun at them. He did show up to threaten to kill anyone who dared protest the police brutality. See the difference?

Pure Lies

 

[PhilFish]

A link to what?

Rittenhouse traveling there with the intent to disrupt peaceful protests ..

I mean really, can you keep up with the shit you're making up?

 

[PhilFish]

They didn’t go there to threaten to kill Rittenhouse … one guy threatened to kill Rittenhouse after he showed up and started chasing him and his friends and pointing his gun at them. He did show up to threaten to kill anyone who dared protest the police brutality. See the difference?

That's a lie that you made up. Please provide a link

 

[Dawg]

Rittenhouse traveling there with the intent to disrupt peaceful protests ..

I mean really, can you keep up with the shit you're making up?

Impossible

 

[EatTheRich]

Rittenhouse traveling there with the intent to disrupt peaceful protests ..

I mean really, can you keep up with the shit you're making up?

Drone video shown at Kyle Rittenhouse trial shows teen fatally shooting man at close range during Kenosha protests

Jurors viewed the clearest video yet of the fatal shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum.

www.cbsnews.com

Again, other people had another reason to be there … peacefully protesting police brutality. Rittenhouse had one reason to be there … violently disrupting those protests. His presence there is otherwise inexplicable.

 

[PhilFish]

Drone video shown at Kyle Rittenhouse trial shows teen fatally shooting man at close range during Kenosha protests

Jurors viewed the clearest video yet of the fatal shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum.

www.cbsnews.com

Again, other people had another reason to be there … peacefully protesting police brutality. Rittenhouse had one reason to be there … violently disrupting those protests. His presence there is otherwise inexplicable.

No, it is explained and corroborated by testimony. The others were burning and destroying

 

[Alinvegas]

So the people standing around when Rittenhouse shot three people should have taught Kyle to fear them...got it.

Too bad Aubery wasn't armed, eh?

They weren't victims. They were perps.

 

[Alinvegas]

The bond was set by the prosecutor....he is not an elected official.

bonds are not set by prosecutors.

 

[EatTheRich]

No, it is explained and corroborated by testimony. The others were burning and destroying

And so that gave Rittenhouse (who had no legal authority to defend others’ property) the right to chase and point guns at anyone in the same town, including people who weren’t burning or destroying, because “the others” were doing that?

 

[Dawg]

And so that gave Rittenhouse (who had no legal authority to defend others’ property) the right to chase and point guns at anyone in the same town, including people who weren’t burning or destroying, because “the others” were doing that?

He does if ask or paid to protect it

Brooks is topic