Red blooded American
Council Member
You think defamation and false accusations are okay?
Tucker Carlson on Rittenhouse: “What a sweet kid”
- Thread starter Bugsy McGurk
- Start date
EatTheRich
President
Says the guy trying to outlaw self-defense.
EatTheRich
President
Yes he was. It’s on the video.
EatTheRich
President
The vast majority were there to protest police brutality, a perfectly honorable action and of course the reason Rittenhouse had a problem with them in the first place.
Its not a self serving view to speak on the facts of the matter. It's self serving to speak in a context that doesn't exist, which would fall on your narrative
Ziminski et all we're seen together several times, presumably planning on what to burn next, and were saying they wanted to get, kill, kick the ass of Rittenhouse. So there's that
.
I don't.
If you mean the part prior to the initial shooting when Ziminski fired and the others said get him....
Then I've seen that yes.
And how were you able to read their minds?
You really suck at this.
Man facing charge for firing gun in air before Rittenhouse shootings now charged with arson
A man who was earlier charged with firing a gun into the air just before Kyle Rittenhouse shot three people during protests in Kenosha was charged Tuesday with arson, alleged
BREAKING: New Footage Shows Moment Kyle Rittenhouse Was Attacked By Rosenbaum, Ziminski
New footage shows the moment Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by a group of rioters on August 24, 2020. The teenager can be seen, by himself, walking down a road while offering medical assistance. “Medical!” Rittenhouse, who was equipped with a first aid kit, could be hear shouting. He then came...
nationalfile.com
Yes. He was there. That annoyed the rioting arsons
He had the same right to be there as anyone else, all of whom lived the same distance from or further than Rittenhouse
No, the evidence showed the tried to kick his ass or kill him
Yes, but not the people we're discussing
I'm not reading any minds... Is that what you do?
And we know that you're not, right?
Wait!
PhilFish; presumably planning on what to burn next, and were saying they wanted to get, kill, kick the ass of Rittenhouse.
What's your definition of 'presumably' and how you used it in that sentence that you wrote?
See post 168.
See I at least back my stuff up. You guys sling hate and make believe.
They were going around trashing and burning as the links show
I'm backing my shit up too, as shown.
Tell me, why aren't cities all across the nation burning day and night 24/7/365?
I dunno, why?
I think you know why but won't admit it because to do so would turn your argument on its head.
But anyway, it's because those 'riots' are for a purpose that is brushed away by the right wing as inconsequential ---when it's the heart of the matter.
Why does the right wing think that way?
No I don't ....if you think there is some correlation to the events in Kenosha (the topic), then speak up.
Cities not burning across the nation mean what? These purposeful riots are to? (Still mean little to law-abiding people ie. Most Americans.
I'm still not right wing.. my opinion is these were thieves and slobs destroying shit, lashing out because they are failures in life.
The heart of the matter is a bunch of thieves and arsons trying to get a guy and kill him. The evidence and a jury decision are on the side of those facts
Post the video or STFU
