Red blooded American
Council Member
You think defamation and false accusations are okay?Doughboy has gotta rehabilitate his image to make the big bucks. No shortage of professional grifter advisers. Grosskreutz should’ve taken the shot.
You think defamation and false accusations are okay?Doughboy has gotta rehabilitate his image to make the big bucks. No shortage of professional grifter advisers. Grosskreutz should’ve taken the shot.
Says the guy trying to outlaw self-defense.It's because they hate America and want it to devolve into a dystopian hell so they can implement communism. Commie is as commie does...
Yes he was. It’s on the video.No comparison to Rittenhouse Case
He wasn't pointing it at anyone before attacked
Kenosha police were busy with a bunch of thugs burning and rioting
You should be more concerned with all the pain pills in Ohio
The vast majority were there to protest police brutality, a perfectly honorable action and of course the reason Rittenhouse had a problem with them in the first place.Ah, yes. But that is not what occurred.
There was a trial and video and everything.
Your make believe that everyone but Rittenhouse was there for saintly reasons and were just minding their business is completely dismissed by the facts
Its not a self serving view to speak on the facts of the matter. It's self serving to speak in a context that doesn't exist, which would fall on your narrativeIf the “evidence” favors that self-serving view, why wasn’t anyone else beaten? Why was Rittenhouse the only one threatened?
I don't.You ignore the part of the video showing Rittenhouse chasing people and pointing his gun at them, before they start pursuing him to disarm him.
And how were you able to read their minds?Its not a self serving view to speak on the facts of the matter. It's self serving to speak in a context that doesn't exist, which would fall on your narrative
Ziminski et all we're seen together several times, presumably planning on what to burn next, and were saying they wanted to get, kill, kick the ass of Rittenhouse. So there's that
.
You really suck at this.Where is your evidence they went there to do any of that? Oh, wait, there isn’t any … you just made that up.
Yes. He was there. That annoyed the rioting arsonsAlmost as if Rittenhouse did something to provoke them that the others didn’t.
He had the same right to be there as anyone else, all of whom lived the same distance from or further than RittenhouseEveryone else managed not to shoot anyone. If Rittenhouse couldn’t have done the same, he shouldn’t have gone there. But of course he had no other reason to go.
No, the evidence showed the tried to kick his ass or kill himAnd you think the people trying to interrupt the violence reviewed the video before trying to disarm Rittenhouse?
Yes, but not the people we're discussingThe vast majority were there to protest police brutality, a perfectly honorable action and of course the reason Rittenhouse had a problem with them in the first place.
I'm not reading any minds... Is that what you do?And how were you able to read their minds?
And we know that you're not, right?I'm not reading any minds... Is that what you do?
And we know that you're not, right?
Wait!
PhilFish; presumably planning on what to burn next, and were saying they wanted to get, kill, kick the ass of Rittenhouse.
What's your definition of 'presumably' and how you used it in that sentence that you wrote?
See post 168.And we know that you're not, right?
Wait!
PhilFish; presumably planning on what to burn next, and were saying they wanted to get, kill, kick the ass of Rittenhouse.
What's your definition of 'presumably' and how you used it in that sentence that you wrote?
I'm backing my shit up too, as shown.See post 168.
See I at least back my stuff up. You guys sling hate and make believe.
They were going around trashing and burning as the links show
I dunno, why?I'm backing my shit up too, as shown.
Tell me, why aren't cities all across the nation burning day and night 24/7/365?
I think you know why but won't admit it because to do so would turn your argument on its head.I dunno, why?
No I don't ....if you think there is some correlation to the events in Kenosha (the topic), then speak up.I think you know why but won't admit it because to do so would turn your argument on its head.
But anyway, it's because those 'riots' are for a purpose that is brushed away by the right wing as inconsequential ---when it's the heart of the matter.
Why does the right wing think that way?
Post the video or STFUYes he was. It’s on the video.