New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Is a peace agreement within America possible ?

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
You think your link about an accusation from 2018 means anything? Read the article and tell me what the charge actually is. Nowhere does it allege improper donations.

Smith claims the foundation received a “$25M financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception”

Also included in the Smith materials are evidence he believes shows “corrupt October 2006 backdating of false tender advertisements purporting to advertise the availability of a $15 million contract to provide HIV/AIDS services in Papua New Guinea on behalf of the Australian government after an agreement was already in place to pay the Clinton Foundation and/or associates.”


What does that mean? backdating of false tender advertisements?

A third complaint concerns what Smith describes as “the $10 million financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception between April 1, 2008, and Sept. 25, 2008, at Washington, D.C., New York, New York, and Canberra Australia involving an MOU between the Australian government, the “Clinton Climate Initiative,” and the purported “Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute Inc.”

And what came of this...four years later? There was never an indictment from either the US or Australian side. Looks like it went nowhere...even with Durham's help.
Who the f*ck said it was an "illegal" contribution? This isn't about the donation at all - you are just using that as a "red herring" here to try and find some cover. You won't.

This was about the fact that Downer was a Clinton crony - and has been since 2006. So the idea that he just "happened to bump into" Papadopoulos and get the info Mifsud (an FBI asset, by the way) had conveniently seeded strains credulity.

Answer a simple question - why is it Trump's "Russian collusion" simply could not be substantiated without wall to wall Clinton friends and associates?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
And references money Downer arranged to get into the Clinton coffers in 2006.
Australia donated to a joint campaign to address AIDS in their part of the world. Your link does not show Downer or Clinton gained from the Australian government donation.

Your link does not show how much Downer had to do with the donation and certainly does not indicate Downer is a crony of Clinton's.
 

God of War

Governor
Likewise, when someone throws out insults...like this
Your dreams are crowding out your reality old man.


How the hell is that "likewise" to answering a question?

It is simply a sign that they know they haven't a coherent argument to support their opinions and are willing to surrender, but throw out an insult as they leave.
You still cartwheeling?:rolleyes:
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Who the f*ck said it was an "illegal" contribution? This isn't about the donation at all - you are just using that as a "red herring" here to try and find some cover. You won't.

This was about the fact that Downer was a Clinton crony - and has been since 2006. So the idea that he just "happened to bump into" Papadopoulos and get the info Mifsud (an FBI asset, by the way) had conveniently seeded strains credulity.

Answer a simple question - why is it Trump's "Russian collusion" simply could not be substantiated without wall to wall Clinton friends and associates?
1. No, it is not a fact. It is your opinion.
2. Why would Papadickless want to meet with Downer? Well...gee, Downer was the highest ranking Australian official in Britain. Downer wanted to learn more of the Trump campaign.
3. You have not and cannot prove Mifsud is an FBI asset anymore than his current residence in Moscow means he is a Putin asset.
4. The accusation of Trump's collusion was based on the Russian hack of the DNC, the release of DNC email in an attempt to hurt Clinton and help Trump...the approximately one hundred contacts and meetings between Russian officials and agents and Putin pals as well as the fact that a Kremlin advisor was also a Trump advisor. It is idiotic in the extreme to suggest there should not have been an investigation. In the end there were not enough evidence to prove collusion. Why do you now suggest Clinton friends substantiated it?
 

God of War

Governor
Kissing Trump's ass isn't something you should brag about.
You know that doesn't logically follow for bending over backwards. Just saying this is two logically inconsequential comments you got going here. The only thing that would distract you like that was if you've been caught in flangrate deLiCKtoe ha ha ha ha ha ha

I know that's wasted on you.
 

God of War

Governor
@middleview

I'm disappointed how you abandoned your cake here. You should have eaten it too. ha ha


 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You know that doesn't logically follow for bending over backwards. Just saying this is two logically inconsequential comments you got going here. The only thing that would distract you like that was if you've been caught in flangrate deLiCKtoe ha ha ha ha ha ha

I know that's wasted on you.
I'm confidant that you are flexible enough to bend over backwards and kiss Trump's fat ass when you get there.

"flagrante delicto "
 

God of War

Governor
I'm confidant that you are flexible enough to bend over backwards and kiss Trump's fat ass when you get there.

"flagrante delicto "
You were supposed to laugh at something actually funny. But you can't. You can only laugh maniacally at the wind. We'll need to stop testing you for actual humor. :0)
 
What concessions would have to be made in order to call a truce in the so-called "Culture War" ?
Freak Extinction

Never negotiate out of fear; always force your enemies to negotiate out of fear. Concessions mean cowardice. This will end only when traditionalists man up and wipe out all traces of New Age sewage.
 
It isn't a war, culture continually evolves. There is nothing anyone can do to stop it.
Some people do not age with grace.
OLD AMERICA: Daniel Boone
NEW-AGE AMERICA: Boondoggles



The ruling class makes their designed change look like natural evolution so we'll passively let them get away with it. All the lies about things changing naturally by themselves is a cover-up of the fact that the few people with the power to change everything create all new ideas and social norms for their own sick sadistic control-freak pleasure.
 
Which means the losers can unilaterally decide to cancel representative government because they arbitrarily dispute the results.
All Republics Go Bananas


Representative government is foster government. Americans don't need to be treated like orphaned children.

All Communist states call themselves "republics," indicating that all other republics are run by elitists who insist that their Party knows what's best for everybody else. The slaves to authority preach that those countries pervert the meaning of "republic." No, they don't. Representation is a re-presentation of all the tyrannical governments that have gone before. When the Constitutionists wrote "We, the people," they were only referring to themselves and their select clique.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. No, it is not a fact. It is your opinion.
2. Why would Papadickless want to meet with Downer? Well...gee, Downer was the highest ranking Australian official in Britain. Downer wanted to learn more of the Trump campaign.
3. You have not and cannot prove Mifsud is an FBI asset anymore than his current residence in Moscow means he is a Putin asset.
4. The accusation of Trump's collusion was based on the Russian hack of the DNC, the release of DNC email in an attempt to hurt Clinton and help Trump...the approximately one hundred contacts and meetings between Russian officials and agents and Putin pals as well as the fact that a Kremlin advisor was also a Trump advisor. It is idiotic in the extreme to suggest there should not have been an investigation. In the end there were not enough evidence to prove collusion. Why do you now suggest Clinton friends substantiated it?
1638405463856.png

Does that look like an "opinion" to you?

And again, you still have yet to address that 1) Shawn Henry was working for the guy who has been indicted for lying to the FBI about who HE was working for (Hillary) when he "concluded" that "the Russians" took the DNC emails, Remember? He was forced under oath to admit he had no evidence of that. 2. Papadopoulous did not mention emails to Downer - only a third hand suggestion by some dude that they had some unspecified "dirt" that they were willing to use - which just so happened to fit neatly into the narrative the Clinton campaign (and various cronies) were pulling out of their asses.

It simply is not possible to reach the conclusion that the "investigation" was justified without tripping over a half dozen Clinton employees, contractors and (or) cronies. That you ignore that exposes your extreme hackishness.
 
Top