Oh okay. It seemed to me that probably meant you were caught with nothing so now you're obfuscating because there are no facts to substantiate your claim. Whatever suits. Thanks for stopping"Probably" means there's no reference.
Oh okay. It seemed to me that probably meant you were caught with nothing so now you're obfuscating because there are no facts to substantiate your claim. Whatever suits. Thanks for stopping"Probably" means there's no reference.
So what do you think about Trump admitting why he fired Comey?Oh okay. It seemed to me that probably meant you were caught with nothing so now you're obfuscating because there are no facts to substantiate your claim. Whatever suits. Thanks for stopping
Yeah, but that was different.Comey wasn't an "investigator" at all. He was a Director of the FBI,
Oh, yeah?
He was investigating Hillary Clinton.....at the same time.
Correct. He left that question to the DOJ. Garland needs to get busy.Nor did he charge him with obstruction of justice. Is that not correct?
It means Comey is setting back drawing a big fat check monthly form federal government and who knows how much from other sourcesSo what do you think about Trump admitting why he fired Comey?
No referral to the DOJ is needed. Garland can move to indict as he sees fit.Does a Special Counsel have the right to file charges or would he have had to make a referral to Trump's DOJ?
Because Trump wrongly fired him.It means Comey is setting back drawing a big fat check monthly form federal government and who knows how much from other sources
As if Trump's DOJ would've even acted on a referral back then.No referral to the DOJ is needed. Garland can move to indict as he sees fit.
Negative, because he was a federal employee for way to long........Because Trump wrongly fired him.
So why hasn't Garland indicted Trump?As if Trump's DOJ would've even acted on a referral back then.
A textbook case of obstruction of justice is hardly a nothingburger.As AG perhaps Garland knows a Nothingburger when he sees it.
You NEVER do.
You’re not paid to be objective or realistic. You’re just a talking points spouting machine.
Mueller intentionally refused to opine on obstruction of justice charges because he wanted to be “fair to Trump” and leave that issue to the DOJ. Of course, Baghdad Barr and Trump then claimed that Mueller vindicated Trump on the obstruction of justice issues. An obscene lie, of course.Probably.
They are no less lawless than Trump because they support his lawlessness. With rare exceptions like Kinzinger and Cheney.Had Republicans been the kind of men they were back in the days of Nixon, they would've held Trump to account. Not so today.
Seems Trump fired him because he thought Comey was out to get himSo what do you think about Trump admitting why he fired Comey?
Why would he leave that question to the department of justice, when he clarified that he did not make a determination...?Correct. He left that question to the DOJ. Garland needs to get busy.
And Trump doing that was okay by you.Seems Trump fired him because he thought Comey was out to get him
He can fire a crooked incompetent who also told him numerous times he was not under investigation.A textbook case of obstruction of justice is hardly a nothingburger.
Or do you contend that a political leader can fire an investigator because that investigator is investigating him without risk of an obstruction of justice charge?
Yep, Barr rushed out with his false statement before the release of the report.Mueller intentionally refused to opine on obstruction of justice charges because he wanted to be “fair to Trump” and leave that issue to the DOJ. Of course, Baghdad Barr and Trump then claimed that Mueller vindicated Trump on the obstruction of justice issues. An obscene lie, of course.
Actually, Trump confessed that he fired Comey because he was investigating him. Trump's actions were those of a guilty man. ha ha.He can fire a crooked incompetent who also told him numerous times he was not under investigation.
Hmmmm
Firing someone? I thought we covered off on this years ago, the president can fire whomever whenever he pleases. Is that not correct?And Trump doing that was okay by you.