New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why does lefty think blacks are so stupid they can't get an ID?

J6 traitors and their GQP sympathizers want to make it harder for all Americans to vote,

J6 Traitors supported by the GQP need to go back to Russia with their pimp and Putin's Whore "Benedict" Donald J Trump
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
86 your silly ass Peanut bs the brown is piled up on your nose

Eh, 4.5million have quit their jobs last November
Companies are going belly up in record numbers and it's big companies with 10's of 1000's of employee's........ only records your 'Brandon' has broken are those of Jimma Carter's disastrous term as President.
Funny thing...the highest unemployment since the great depression was under Trump...at 15% in 2020. Second highest was Reagan at 10.8%. Top unemployment rate was Hoover at 25%. Now we are at 3.9%. At his best Trump had it at 3.7%....

 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Funny thing...the highest unemployment since the great depression was under Trump...at 15% in 2020. Second highest was Reagan at 10.8%. Top unemployment rate was Hoover at 25%. Now we are at 3.9%. At his best Trump had it at 3.7%....

Only a fool believes unemployment is now 3.9%
Especially with all the companies that are shuttering their doors, check Craig, Co and number of coal miners and all attached to the mines losing their jobs or the 250 that lost their jobs in Kentucky after tornado destroyed candle factory and so one and so forth not enough band width to list all here.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Says the segregator suppoter.
Hmmm, let's see...who actually implemented a plan to segregate? Oh yeah...the guy who refused to rent to non-white tenants and paid lawyers for two years to avoid having to do that?

 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Only a fool believes unemployment is now 3.9%
Especially with all the companies that are shuttering their doors, check Craig, Co and number of coal miners and all attached to the mines losing their jobs or the 250 that lost their jobs in Kentucky after tornado destroyed candle factory and so one and so forth not enough band width to list all here.
Holy shit! So you must have a source showing unemployment is worse now than Jan 2021...right?

Of course not. You pull this crap out of thin air and run away.

The mine closure was announced in Jan 2020, even before Covid and while Trump was the president.

 

Zam-Zam

Senator
Food for thought:

It was supposed to be the study that proved voter ID laws are not just discriminatory but can also have a big impact on elections. And it was picked up widely, with outlets including ThinkProgress and the Washington Post reporting that the study found voter ID laws hurt Hispanic voters in particular and skewed elections to the right.

But a follow-up study suggests the findings in the original were bunk. According to researchers at Stanford, Yale, and the University of Pennsylvania, the original study was based on surveys of voters that are extremely unreliable — skewing the results. On top of that, several calculation errors led to even more problems. When the errors are corrected, the follow-up researchers found, there’s no evidence in the analyzed data that voter ID laws have a statistically significant impact on voter turnout.

In other words, it’s possible that voter ID laws still have an impact on elections, but the original study just doesn’t have the data to prove it.

The findings aren’t too surprising. Looking at the broader research, the empirical evidence has tended to find that voter ID laws have a small impact on elections. While they still may be racially discriminatory or unnecessary, ultimately voter ID laws may not have a strong enough effect on voter turnout, based on the available research so far, to swing anything but the closest election. And the newest study backs that up.

The new study suggests voter ID laws have little to no impact on minority voter turnout
The previous study, published in January by a trio of researchers at UC San Diego, Michigan State University, and Bucknell University, used 2006–2014 data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies (CCES) to study the effect of voter ID laws. They concluded, “The analysis shows that strict identification laws have a differentially negative impact on the turnout of racial and ethnic minorities in primaries and general elections. We also find that voter ID laws skew democracy toward those on the political right.”




Complete text: A major study finding that voter ID laws hurt minorities isn’t standing up well under scrutiny - Vox


Of course, I realize that this study does not say what some people want it to say, so it is to be ridiculed and/or ignored without bothering to read it.

Speaking as one of the very few black people on this forum, I personally have never had any problem getting an ID, nor do I know anyone who has. I will now stand by for the inevitable white poster to lecture me on what it's like to be black.
 

EatTheRich

President
Food for thought:

It was supposed to be the study that proved voter ID laws are not just discriminatory but can also have a big impact on elections. And it was picked up widely, with outlets including ThinkProgress and the Washington Post reporting that the study found voter ID laws hurt Hispanic voters in particular and skewed elections to the right.

But a follow-up study suggests the findings in the original were bunk. According to researchers at Stanford, Yale, and the University of Pennsylvania, the original study was based on surveys of voters that are extremely unreliable — skewing the results. On top of that, several calculation errors led to even more problems. When the errors are corrected, the follow-up researchers found, there’s no evidence in the analyzed data that voter ID laws have a statistically significant impact on voter turnout.

In other words, it’s possible that voter ID laws still have an impact on elections, but the original study just doesn’t have the data to prove it.

The findings aren’t too surprising. Looking at the broader research, the empirical evidence has tended to find that voter ID laws have a small impact on elections. While they still may be racially discriminatory or unnecessary, ultimately voter ID laws may not have a strong enough effect on voter turnout, based on the available research so far, to swing anything but the closest election. And the newest study backs that up.

The new study suggests voter ID laws have little to no impact on minority voter turnout
The previous study, published in January by a trio of researchers at UC San Diego, Michigan State University, and Bucknell University, used 2006–2014 data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies (CCES) to study the effect of voter ID laws. They concluded, “The analysis shows that strict identification laws have a differentially negative impact on the turnout of racial and ethnic minorities in primaries and general elections. We also find that voter ID laws skew democracy toward those on the political right.”




Complete text: A major study finding that voter ID laws hurt minorities isn’t standing up well under scrutiny - Vox


Of course, I realize that this study does not say what some people want it to say, so it is to be ridiculed and/or ignored without bothering to read it.

Speaking as one of the very few black people on this forum, I personally have never had any problem getting an ID, nor do I know anyone who has. I will now stand by for the inevitable white poster to lecture me on what it's like to be black.
Hence why Republicans are redoubling their voter suppression efforts … their attempts to create Jim Crow elections with voter ID laws didn’t turn out as well as they’d planned.
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Hmmm, let's see...who actually implemented a plan to segregate? Oh yeah...the guy who refused to rent to non-white tenants and paid lawyers for two years to avoid having to do that?

Nope. 1896 Plessy Ferguson where the only dissenting Justice Harlan, the only (R) on the court dissented, the rest (D)'s rule in favor of segregation.

But nice of you to point out what Trump did as a (D). When will you learn your lesson and give up racism Aas a political to for profit or gain?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Nope. 1896 Plessy Ferguson where the only dissenting Justice Harlan, the only (R) on the court dissented, the rest (D)'s rule in favor of segregation.

But nice of you to point out what Trump did as a (D). When will you learn your lesson and give up racism Aas a political to for profit or gain?
So you think Trump changed his racist POV when he re-registered as a republican?
So all those southerners who voted "D" in the years before 1964 and implemented Jim Crow became less racist when they started voting "R"?
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Hence why Republicans are redoubling their voter suppression efforts … their attempts to create Jim Crow elections with voter ID laws didn’t turn out as well as they’d planned.
Jim Crow? You are Jim Crow. You should have joined the party of ending slavery and individual rights, not the party of Jim Crow. You lose. Try again phony socialist.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
So you think Trump changed his racist POV when he re-registered as a republican?
So all those southerners who voted "D" in the years before 1964 and implemented Jim Crow became less racist when they started voting "R"?
You tell readers since you flipped from repub to leftist after McCain lost___________________go
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
So you think Trump changed his racist POV when he re-registered as a republican?
So all those southerners who voted "D" in the years before 1964 and implemented Jim Crow became less racist when they started voting "R"?
It's a requirement.

What????

All those southerners? They are dead. I was born in the south lived in the South all my life. Never voted lefty.

Name 10 prominent lefty from the South that switched?

George Wallace...Nope (D) till death.

Bull Connor...(D) till death.

1642700931817.png

I guess Jimmah switched huh?
 
Top