Like most of yours are used to denigrate Biden and the Dems? Polls are good when you agree with them, right?Correct me if I'm wrong:
Most of your posts center on whom you wish to denigrate.
Is that responsible?
But it's all good.
Like most of yours are used to denigrate Biden and the Dems? Polls are good when you agree with them, right?Correct me if I'm wrong:
Most of your posts center on whom you wish to denigrate.
Is that responsible?
I win the debate.....because you refuse to offer counter-points to my claims.You're dodging the question.
In doing so, I believe you are inadvertently answering it.
This exchange is funny.I win the debate.....because you refuse to offer counter-points to my claims.
Is that your goal?I win the debate.....because you refuse to offer counter-points to my claims.
Presenting a poll is presenting factual information.Like most of yours are used to denigrate Biden and the Dems? Polls are good when you agree with them, right?
But it's all good.
We were discussing what is responsible citizenship and I posted this to you.Is that your goal?
As long as you can disparage someone that's a "win"?
How sad for you.
Good call. I think it (responsible citizenship) entails not pretending only anti-vaxxers are the cause of covid spread. Agree?We were discussing what is responsible citizenship and I posted this to you.
Spreading falsehoods and conspiracies about Covid, masks and vaxs is NOT responsible citizenship.
Do you agree/disagree? If you disagree, give me your counter-argument. That's what's done in a debate.
Spreading falsehoods and conspiracies about Covid, masks and vaxs is NOT responsible citizenship.Good call. I think it (responsible citizenship) entails not pretending only anti-vaxxers are the cause of covid spread. Agree?
I agree. And that includes all sources of falsehoods..Spreading falsehoods and conspiracies about Covid, masks and vaxs is NOT responsible citizenship.
Agree/disagree?
There was slavery until 1830 in New York, 1857 in Connecticut, and 1865 in New Jersey. Most of the slaveowners from 1828 on were Democrats, and the Democratic Party was the political mouthpiece of Big Slavery. But you are right, there were slaveowners of other parties and Democrats outside the South with dissident views.No...Southerners had slaves. Northerners did not.
Not all democrats lived in the south.
I'm fine with you having that as your opinion.We were discussing what is responsible citizenship and I posted this to you.
Spreading falsehoods and conspiracies about Covid, masks and vaxs is NOT responsible citizenship.
Do you agree/disagree? If you disagree, give me your counter-argument. That's what's done in a debate.
There were very few slaves in states north of the Mason Dixon line by the time the civil war started in 1861...There was slavery until 1830 in New York, 1857 in Connecticut, and 1865 in New Jersey. Most of the slaveowners from 1828 on were Democrats, and the Democratic Party was the political mouthpiece of Big Slavery. But you are right, there were slaveowners of other parties and Democrats outside the South with dissident views.
You're dodging the question.
In doing so, I believe you are inadvertently answering it.
That's your opinion. You are welcome to it.Maybe I can rephrase it to make it more understandable to you:
It is not illegal to a selfish jerk and put others at risk because of your selfishness.
You are not being a good citizen if you act that way.
----------------
Or as PNWest sez: DON'T BE AN AZZHOLE!
Yup. The Confederacy was the creature of a Slave Power upset that the voters had rejected its decades of hegemony.There were very few slaves in states north of the Mason Dixon line by the time the civil war started in 1861...
The articles of session are pretty adamant about their right to expand slavery into the new western states. The problem as I see it is one of the value of existing slaves. As they breed, their children are a product the slave owners want to sell...if they needed 20 slaves to work their property and have a couple of children per year, those are non-productive mouths and will be unneeded workers as they grow up....each new generation lowers the value of existing slaves. The fighting in Kansas was all about whether it would be a market for slaves or not.
How far does that go? If the guy at Taco Bell doesn’t want to wash his hands after he takes a crap, is that none of your business?That's your opinion. You are welcome to it.
In my opinion, other people's medical decisions are none of my business.
In a sense, yes.How far does that go? If the guy at Taco Bell doesn’t want to wash his hands after he takes a crap, is that none of your business?
That's your opinion. You are welcome to it.
In my opinion, other people's medical decisions are none of my business.
I likely would not have hired her as a cook.
Restating the winger viewpoint, they don’t think someone’s “medical choices” are their business UNLESS those choices affect them personally.Of course it is my opinion.
And yesterday weren't you saying that you wouldn't hire Typhoid Mary? Didn't you say:
Why not? Medical authorities told the woman that she was infectious, that she shouldn't be working with food. She exercised her rights to keep working as a cook and inflecting people..... at least she did until they threw her into quarantine.
But you probably wouldn't have hired her.. Right.