New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Who's threatening violence against politicians?

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Well - elections don't work. Dems are allowed to cheat all they want.
Republicans continue to claim the election was stolen and people like you believe them even though they have produced zero credible evidence.

I'm not sure if that is evidence of extreme partisanship or just a lack of intelligence.
 
Repubs had
Republicans continue to claim the election was stolen and people like you believe them even though they have produced zero credible evidence.

I'm not sure if that is evidence of extreme partisanship or just a lack of intelligence.
No evidence.?? We have mountains of it but the fake news press won't discuss it . Team trump was going to present the evidence to congress on jan6. That's when pelosi sent in her goons to turn the protests into a riot and use that as an excuse to cancel the hearings. I'm reading a book right now called "Rigged" discussing the stolen election. Everyone should read that.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Repubs had


No evidence.?? We have mountains of it but the fake news press won't discuss it . Team trump was going to present the evidence to congress on jan6. That's when pelosi sent in her goons to turn the protests into a riot and use that as an excuse to cancel the hearings. I'm reading a book right now called "Rigged" discussing the stolen election. Everyone should read that.
You just keep making shit up....like the idea that Trump was going to present evidence to congress on Jan 6th. No he wasn't. His legal geniuses filed 62 lawsuits and presented nothing even close to the fictional "mountain of evidence". Several judges (republicans) even wrote opinions that the "evidence" was not even close to sufficient for their lawsuit.

Let me ask you when Trump's presentation was supposed to happen? When the riot happened the count of electors was in progress. The entire congress was present at the count and at the end they were going to announce Biden had won....so was Trump's proof going to happen after that?

Sydney Powell told you no rational human being would think her allegations about Dominion were facts. Barr, Trump's AG, was fired when he told Trump the election wasn't stolen. Krebbs was fired as head of Cyber Security when he told the media that there was no evidence at all of any kind of hack on election machines.

The Trumplicans said there should be a "forensic" audit...whatever that means...but they got what the AZ folks called a forensic audit, paid Cyber Ninjas a bunch of bucks for it and they found nothing. What is left? Lott and his bullshit mathematics?
 
Last edited:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Well - elections don't work. Dems are allowed to cheat all they want.
So you support threats of violence against election workers, even if there is zero evidence to back it up? One America News is now retracting their story about election fraud in Georgia.
One America News Admits “No Widespread Voter Fraud” by Georgia Election Workers

 

reason10

Governor
Public officials across the country have reported an increasing number of threats over the past couple of years, with targets ranging from members of Congress and governors to even school board members and health care workers.

Who are the perps?

Departing White House press secretary Jen Psaki details threats against her and her family (msn.com)
Quoting Psaki is only done by morons. She is an embarrassment.

Just remember the animals who are threatening 2/3 of the United States Supreme Court.
 

reason10

Governor
And somehow only the republicans get caught cheating.
Nope.
Only Democrats cheat. Only 28 percent of the country agrees with those idiots. They HAVE to cheat to win.

If Republicans pulled these same tactics of mailing in ballots with zero documentation, there wouldn't be a Democrat holding public office at all. And the vote counters would wonder why a candidate could win by more votes than the population of the world.

Only Democrats cheat. They cannot win otherwise.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Nope.
Only Democrats cheat. Only 28 percent of the country agrees with those idiots. They HAVE to cheat to win.

If Republicans pulled these same tactics of mailing in ballots with zero documentation, there wouldn't be a Democrat holding public office at all. And the vote counters would wonder why a candidate could win by more votes than the population of the world.

Only Democrats cheat. They cannot win otherwise.
Oh, so now it is "zero documentation"?
1. The envelope the absentee ballot has the address, name and signature of the voter.
2. The serial number on the envelope must match the record on the voter database of the ballot mailed to that voter. The signature must match the one on the voter's registration record.
3. Where were more ballots received than registered voters?

Two candidates have lost the popular vote and still won the election in the last 100 years...both republicans. So they took office with the majority of voters wanting the other candidate.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Quoting Psaki is only done by morons. She is an embarrassment.

Just remember the animals who are threatening 2/3 of the United States Supreme Court.
Yeah, like the time she said she worried about the furniture of our children...and to investigate the oranges of an investigation?

Oh...that was Trump
 

Boca

Governor
Republicans continue to claim the election was stolen and people like you believe them even though they have produced zero credible evidence.

I'm not sure if that is evidence of extreme partisanship or just a lack of intelligence.
2000 Mules

Now go kill the messenger despite it being evidence.

Aside from that, the fact that several states found it necessary to revise their election procedures and rules is strong evidence in itself.
 
Last edited:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
2000 Mules

Now go kill the messenger despite it being evidence.

Aside from that, the fact that several states found it necessary to revise their election procedures and rules is strong evidence in itself.
2000 Mules is a bunch of crap. I've already posted a link debugging the logic of his cell phone traces. D'Souza cannot identify one single one of the people he accuses of stuffing ballot boxes. He thinks that his data proves those people actually walked up to those ballot boxes. What he shows you is that they were within 30 to 50 feet of one. That is proof to you?

Several states have modified their election rules...why? Not because they had to...it was because they wanted more control for the legislature instead of the Secretary of State's office or the local election boards. Did they act on the basis of evidence? What evidence did they have that handing someone in line a free bottle of water changed a vote?
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
2000 Mules

Now go kill the messenger despite it being evidence.

Aside from that, the fact that several states found it necessary to revise their election procedures and rules is strong evidence in itself.
Now we have wingers arguing that the rampant GOP voter suppression/election rigging laws is evidence of past voter fraud. Because there is no evidence of actual voter fraud that needs to be addressed by such laws.

That is some seriously lame desperation and dishonesty.
 

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Nope.
Only Democrats cheat. Only 28 percent of the country agrees with those idiots. They HAVE to cheat to win.

If Republicans pulled these same tactics of mailing in ballots with zero documentation, there wouldn't be a Democrat holding public office at all. And the vote counters would wonder why a candidate could win by more votes than the population of the world.

Only Democrats cheat. They cannot win otherwise.
so all the hundreds of thousands of snow birds in the beloved retirement belt voting republican are cheating - got it ! so glad we got that out there ! .......... oh wait - they aren't cheating but sure seem to get caught don't they.
 

Boca

Governor
LMAO. I gave you the thumbs up for the laugh.

1) D'Souza wasn't out to identify the Mules of two years ago. That's a job for law enforcement. He was simply documenting the problem so the public would understand what happened

2) But, seriously, do you really think tracking cell phones is about pinpointing a position in a small area of 30 or 50 feet? Really?

3) Nope, it's about tracking a phone going to other drop box locations in the town or city, or another city, or in the state, or for that matter, other bordering states, if they've harvested ballots in them.

Oh, BTW, can you point me to your post debunking the logic?
 

bdtex

Administrator
Staff member
Aside from that, the fact that several states found it necessary to revise their election procedures and rules is strong evidence in itself.
It wasn't "necessary". Republicans in some states did it to try to provide themselves some cover for the Big Lie they continue to tell.
 
Top