New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Things sure change under Biden Stewardship. Next up: North Korea...

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
"Loss of containment"? Biden has resumed joint training exercises with South Korea...something Trump had stopped. Do you prefer that our forces be less ready to counter a North Korean invasion?
Ya think maybe that's why Kim decided to start testing missiles again? Effing warmongers...
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. Trump did nothing to negotiate a halt to fighting or a withdrawal of Russian troops from Donbas for four years.
2. Trump repeatedly spoke out against Nato and some of his own advisors feared he'd withdraw. Why wouldn't Putin think if Trump were given four more years that his take over of Ukraine would be so much easier?
3. Why is it that Nato responded with such unity against the invasion? Would it have happened if Trump were still president? Hell no.
1. The Donbass is disputed territory with majority Russian speaking people - it wasn't Russian troops Kyiv was fighting there, it was separatists.
2. Putin has been clear all along that he'd never let Ukraine become a NATO member - if Trump had won he would have had no reason to invade.
3. I don't think "unity" means what you think it means:

1655854216417.png

LOL!
 
Oh.. my bad... A riff on your comment...applied to Democrats..


They can't bear the crushing weight on actually having to govern.

They are weak individuals who go out of their way to avoid responsibility.
No, they voted for a candidate because they wanted the responsibility of governing. They sought out the opportunity to solve impossible problems.

3rd party voters are so frightened of being wrong, they don't even want to try. They don't actually what the 3rd party's platform actually is. The nuttier the better, that make the chance of victory and the opportunity to attempt to solve problems nil. 3rd party votes are scared little children.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
No, they voted for a candidate because they wanted the responsibility of governing. They sought out the opportunity to solve impossible problems.

3rd party voters are so frightened of being wrong, they don't even want to try. They don't actually what the 3rd party's platform actually is. The nuttier the better, that make the chance of victory and the opportunity to attempt to solve problems nil. 3rd party votes are scared little children.
that's great. but at it's core.. theyre solving zippo...squadoosh...nana..zilch.. that includes Democrats..who..in the seat of power...moo..and bleat trump..for all things..


'opportunity to attempt to solve problems' shit..talk about word salads..
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Yes, making a good faith effort to solve the world's problems is morally superior to the people who go out of their way to avoid bearing that weight.
like..um... trying to cajole Dumb Un into the light....??

or making huge corporate tax cuts that might reap huge returns.....>


aaaaand....now....dance..baby.dance...
 
that's great. but at it's core.. theyre solving zippo...squadoosh...nana..zilch.. that includes Democrats..who..in the seat of power...moo..and bleat trump..for all things..


'opportunity to attempt to solve problems' shit..talk about word salads..
Problems aren't always easy to solve. Sometimes they are impossible. You still have to try. 3rd party voters don't do that. They don't actually believe the 3rd party platform would solve any problems. The reason they vote 3rd party is so they claim some faux intellectual superiority of not being wrong. When the world needs people to take the risk of being right instead of quivelling in fear of being wrong.
 
like..um... trying to cajole Dumb Un into the light....??

or making huge corporate tax cuts that might reap huge returns.....>


aaaaand....now....dance..baby.dance...
You aren't making any sense. I have no idea what that means or the context you are trying to shoe horn it into.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Problems aren't always easy to solve. Sometimes they are impossible. You still have to try. 3rd party voters don't do that. They don't actually believe the 3rd party platform would solve any problems. The reason they vote 3rd party is so they claim some faux intellectual superiority of not being wrong. When the world needs people to take the risk of being right instead of quivelling in fear of being wrong.
ok..well, the word waits for democrats to sally forth....and stop bleating trump tike scared children...
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
You aren't making any sense. I have no idea what that means or the context you are trying to shoe horn it into.
ok, so you yammer about an opportunity to solve problems..i give you an example..or two.... you...forget what you were discussing..

so, nil. gotcha...
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
And sometimes solving problems entails finding the root of the problem and sometimes that root is Trump.

I will have more lessons ready in problem solving for you.
sure. as biden leaves the tax cuts in place, goes begging to Saudia Arabia, watches Putin stomp on ukraine, etc...

nice.
 
sure. as biden leaves the tax cuts in place, goes begging to Saudia Arabia, watches Putin stomp on ukraine, etc...

nice.
Right, sometimes being a problem solver means makes choices that people don't like.
3rd party voters are absolutely terrified of that responsibility. They are scared of people not liking them and their decisions.
 
Top