New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

"That's a note that I wrote..." Any more egregious lie to Congress ever?

Boca

Governor
Wrong Raoul. I don’t care whether a crook is on the left or the right. I favor prosecution for corruption and criminal acts committed by any public servant. Clinton was impeached, disbarred and fined heavily. Blagoyovich was tossed out of office and thrown in prison for 10 years, Cuomo was forced to resign…..I had no problem with any of that…like my old man always said: “You get hat you get”….Any legal or political problems Trump had or has are all his own fault. Him and his big, fat ignorant mouth. When are you mooks going to stop making excuses for this pompous ass hole? Time to jettison this fat lying pussy Raoul.
Any other words of wisdom he graced you with?
 

God of War

Governor
That’s direct testimony. If it could be shown that you didn’t hear it from the horse’s mouth as you claimed, you could certainly be charged for saying you did under oath to a congressional committee.
Hearsay is inherently unreliable because even the hearing of it is unprovable. It is the reason courts don't hear it.


On the fool/evil genius scale you're tilting fool.
 

God of War

Governor
It’s not a court, and it has nothing to do with kangaroos. It’s a congressional hearing investigating your cult leader’s coup attempt. But you oppose the investigation. Because you’re deplorable. So you support the stonewalling.
Forget it. Kill Trump. See what that gets you.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Kangaroo courts don't have one shred of testimony by definition.
Again...let us know when this reaches a court room. Until then it is an investigation....just as valid (actually more so) than the 8 investigations into Benghazi, the 6 year long White Water waste of $60 million bucks or the Durham attempt to make Trump look more like a victim.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
He lied under oath...that is not perjury unless the question asked was pertinent to the allegation that he had engaged in sexual harassment of Paula Jones.

He was never accused of harassing Lewinsky to have sex with him.
Lying under Oath is PERJURY
and cost him $90,000

Why am I not surprised you think Lewinsky is a
"HIM"

Explains why PJ leftist scared SCOTUS will go after Gays next!

:)
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
An investigation isn't televised. ha ha
So what would you call the Benghazi sessions where Hillary sat for 11 hours answering questions? Was that a kangaroo court?

You want to argue about semantics. The Jan 6 Committee has conducted some parts of their work behind closed doors. These sessions do not involve a jury or a judge. They do not have the power of a court. It is McCarthy's fault that there are only two republicans on the committee...he pulled three republicans off because he wanted Jordan to be a member...but we all know what a useless partisan POS he is.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Lying under Oath is PERJURY
and cost him $90,000

Why am I not surprised you think Lewinsky is a
"HIM"

Explains why PJ leftist scared SCOTUS will go after Gays next!

:)
Bill never harassed Lewinsky to have sex with him (bill). Are you really that language impaired?

No, lying under oath is not always perjury and he was being fined for contempt of court.

Generally, a witness in a trial commits perjury when they knowingly and intentionally lie about a material issue

 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
So what would you call the Benghazi sessions where Hillary sat for 11 hours answering questions? Was that a kangaroo court?

You want to argue about semantics. The Jan 6 Committee has conducted some parts of their work behind closed doors. These sessions do not involve a jury or a judge. They do not have the power of a court. It is McCarthy's fault that there are only two republicans on the committee...he pulled three republicans off because he wanted Jordan to be a member...but we all know what a useless partisan POS he is.
whataboutism
is all you ever have
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Bill never harassed Lewinsky to have sex with him (bill). Are you really that language impaired?

No, lying under oath is not always perjury and he was being fined for contempt of court.

Generally, a witness in a trial commits perjury when they knowingly and intentionally lie about a material issue

and that's exactly what Slick did intentionally

"I did not have sex with that women"

No wonder you want to jack topic away from Hutchinson
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
and that's exactly what Slick did intentionally

"I did not have sex with that women"

No wonder you want to jack topic away from Hutchinson
Whether or not he'd had sex with Lewinsky was not relevant to whether or not he had harassed Jones at her place of work for not having sex with him.

Why do you think he was not convicted of perjury?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
If you read that, you will see that he was held in contempt of court, not convicted of perjury or any other crime.
and if you read it he was fined $90,000 for lying
I realize you stayed up all night posting but surely you got enough rest to know the fine was for perjury
 
Top