New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Welcome to the Great Biden Recession Of 2022

reason10

Governor

Nobody offered support for the violent rioters in 2020...meanwhile here you are excusing the riot of Jan 6 as if it were a family picnic.


That is a lie from an argument you've already lost. Maxipad Waters incited ALL those riots. You've already seen the links. Knock off the lies.

What "law abiding" citizens do you think democrats are targeting?

Pretty much everyone who has a job. Those are conservatives, the people who make this country work. And to the Democrats, we are the enemy because we are in this country legally.
 

reason10

Governor
Here is a little reading on Nazi policy related to abortion and contraception. Looks a lot like what republicans want to do.

Your link mentions NOTHING relevant.

The Eugenics/Holocaust/abortion links have already been proven, in reliable links here.

Charles Darwin planted the seed with "The Descent Of Man."
Francis Galton created the Eugenics movement.
Margaret Sanger (and other Eugenics proponents) began using Eugenics to illegally sterilize races and groups she felt was inferior.
Nazis took this to the next level by creating the concentration camps.


You actually created a thread defending that monster Sanger.
What's next?
A thread defending Eichmann? Mengele? Hitler?

YOUR side of the aisle.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Your link mentions NOTHING relevant.

The Eugenics/Holocaust/abortion links have already been proven, in reliable links here.

Charles Darwin planted the seed with "The Descent Of Man."
Francis Galton created the Eugenics movement.
Margaret Sanger (and other Eugenics proponents) began using Eugenics to illegally sterilize races and groups she felt was inferior.
Nazis took this to the next level by creating the concentration camps.


You actually created a thread defending that monster Sanger.
What's next?
A thread defending Eichmann? Mengele? Hitler?

YOUR side of the aisle.
I pointed out the Nazi policy on abortion and contraception and you resort to changing the subject from how similar their policy was to republican policy to a rant on eugenics....wow.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Nobody offered support for the violent rioters in 2020...meanwhile here you are excusing the riot of Jan 6 as if it were a family picnic.

That is a lie from an argument you've already lost. Maxipad Waters incited ALL those riots. You've already seen the links. Knock off the lies.

What "law abiding" citizens do you think democrats are targeting?

Pretty much everyone who has a job. Those are conservatives, the people who make this country work. And to the Democrats, we are the enemy because we are in this country legally.
I've seen quotes from 2018 and her "tell them you're not welcome" quote. Two years later and you think that encouraged looting and arson?

She also said, in 2021, if Chauvin was acquitted the demonstrators should be more confrontational. He was not acquitted.

 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
This is what happens when vote counting isn't monitored. There is NO WAY that racist bag of bat guano was legally elected by legally registered voters.

The 2024 election had better be monitored more carefully. This country can't take another four years of this incompetent disaster.
WTF are you talking about? Vote counting is monitored. Numerous cross checks are in place in every state to insure that only legal ballots are counted. I have explained this to you in so many posts that for you to continue to make these bullshit claims is amazing.

You have yet to find any new evidence and everything you've posted in the past has been destroyed by the facts. Even an invitation to propose a hypothetical means that the election could be stolen has failed.

Speaking of racist...did you forget Trump's lawsuit for his refusal to rent to non-white tenants. He defended his racism for two years.
 

reason10

Governor
WTF are you talking about? Vote counting is monitored. Numerous cross checks are in place in every state to insure that only legal ballots are counted. I have explained this to you in so many posts that for you to continue to make these bullshit claims is amazing.

You have yet to find any new evidence and everything you've posted in the past has been destroyed by the facts. Even an invitation to propose a hypothetical means that the election could be stolen has failed.


Speaking of racist...did you forget Trump's lawsuit for his refusal to rent to non-white tenants. He defended his racism for two years.


I did a search of that lie. No reliable sources could be found. Just liberal sites, and they all were using the same wording, which means they all got their lie from ONE source.

As far as a search of RELIABLE sources, I did find this, about President Trump and blacks.

"Four years ago he [Trump] talked about what he wanted to do for the Black community and he brought about results," Jones told host Bret Baier. "Opportunity zone districts, support of historically Black colleges, and prison reform with the First Step Act."

"President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden did not have a plan for African-Americans," Jones said later. "President Obama meant a lot to Black people but he didn't do anything for Black people. And certainly Joe Biden followed suit. But this president is back again, laying out his future [plans] on how he is going to assist to lift the Black community out of dark conditions such as school choice.

The president's so-called "Platinum Plan" calls for a nearly $500 billion increase in Black communities' access to economic capital. It also designates the Ku Klux Klan and Antifa as terrorist organizations.

This is what happens when educated people seek the truth.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
WTF are you talking about? Vote counting is monitored. Numerous cross checks are in place in every state to insure that only legal ballots are counted. I have explained this to you in so many posts that for you to continue to make these bullshit claims is amazing.

You have yet to find any new evidence and everything you've posted in the past has been destroyed by the facts. Even an invitation to propose a hypothetical means that the election could be stolen has failed.



Speaking of racist...did you forget Trump's lawsuit for his refusal to rent to non-white tenants. He defended his racism for two years.

I did a search of that lie. No reliable sources could be found. Just liberal sites, and they all were using the same wording, which means they all got their lie from ONE source.

As far as a search of RELIABLE sources, I did find this, about President Trump and blacks.

"Four years ago he [Trump] talked about what he wanted to do for the Black community and he brought about results," Jones told host Bret Baier. "Opportunity zone districts, support of historically Black colleges, and prison reform with the First Step Act."

"President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden did not have a plan for African-Americans," Jones said later. "President Obama meant a lot to Black people but he didn't do anything for Black people. And certainly Joe Biden followed suit. But this president is back again, laying out his future [plans] on how he is going to assist to lift the Black community out of dark conditions such as school choice.


The president's so-called "Platinum Plan" calls for a nearly $500 billion increase in Black communities' access to economic capital. It also designates the Ku Klux Klan and Antifa as terrorist organizations.

This is what happens when educated people seek the truth.
I have already destroyed D'Souza's movie in posts to every one of the right wingers who brought it up as if it proves fraud.
Post #15.

FBI releases files on Trump apartments' race discrimination probe in '70s


 

EatTheRich

President
"Ownership" is in the eye of the beholder. What is the difference between "private ownership" of enterprises run for the benefit of a government agenda and that which is owned by the State and run by apparatchiks? Seriously, "private ownership" is "aggressively right wing?" That's not the majority view.
1. No, fascism is aggressively right-wing.
2. The biggest difference is that generalized state ownership undermines the material foundations of bourgeois rule while state capitalism, which is always run for the benefit of the ruling class based on private ownership, does not.
 

EatTheRich

President
Nobody offered support for the violent rioters in 2020...meanwhile here you are excusing the riot of Jan 6 as if it were a family picnic.

That is a lie from an argument you've already lost. Maxipad Waters incited ALL those riots. You've already seen the links. Knock off the lies.

What "law abiding" citizens do you think democrats are targeting?

Pretty much everyone who has a job. Those are conservatives, the people who make this country work. And to the Democrats, we are the enemy because we are in this country legally.
Nearly all Democrats are here legally and have jobs.

Riots were inevitable when the police state spent decades killing one innocent person after another.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. No, fascism is aggressively right-wing.
2. The biggest difference is that generalized state ownership undermines the material foundations of bourgeois rule while state capitalism, which is always run for the benefit of the ruling class based on private ownership, does not.
1. It is only "right wing" in the sense that it doesn't (technically) confiscate private property. That's not "aggressively" right wing at all - it is more like barely right wing. It does, however, accomplish the "aggressively" left wing agenda of a centrally planned economy run by the government on behalf (ostensibly) of "the people." The fact that leftist academics control the narrative of our history is responsible for it being "defined" as "right wing." It isn't.
2. That is a distinction without a difference - in case you haven't noticed, pretty much every Marxist implementation has resulted in connected political cronies and politicians living like potentates while the people, well, starved.
 

EatTheRich

President
1. It is only "right wing" in the sense that it doesn't (technically) confiscate private property. That's not "aggressively" right wing at all - it is more like barely right wing. It does, however, accomplish the "aggressively" left wing agenda of a centrally planned economy run by the government on behalf (ostensibly) of "the people." The fact that leftist academics control the narrative of our history is responsible for it being "defined" as "right wing." It isn't.
2. That is a distinction without a difference - in case you haven't noticed, pretty much every Marxist implementation has resulted in connected political cronies and politicians living like potentates while the people, well, starved.
1. It’s also aggressively right wing in that it systematically destroys every left-wing center of political power and persecutes every manifestation of leftist thought.
2. The step forward to socialism inescapably proceeds unevenly, and elements of the exploitation that characterizes the capitalist past from which we are only beginning to emerge are not eliminated overnight. The fact remains that there has been no socialist revolution that has not raised the national standard of living, and no socialist country’s nomenklatura that was as free to accumulate wealth and pass it on to future generations as the bourgeoisie.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. It’s also aggressively right wing in that it systematically destroys every left-wing center of political power and persecutes every manifestation of leftist thought.
2. The step forward to socialism inescapably proceeds unevenly, and elements of the exploitation that characterizes the capitalist past from which we are only beginning to emerge are not eliminated overnight. The fact remains that there has been no socialist revolution that has not raised the national standard of living, and no socialist country’s nomenklatura that was as free to accumulate wealth and pass it on to future generations as the bourgeoisie.
1. It "destroys" freedom, including the freedom to be left wing.
2. Yes, socialism is "messy" and exploiters will use whatever ideology that is in control to, well, control.
 

EatTheRich

President
1. It "destroys" freedom, including the freedom to be left wing.
2. Yes, socialism is "messy" and exploiters will use whatever ideology that is in control to, well, control.
1. Indeed, the primary purpose of it is to destroy the freedom to be left wing so that the right can achieve its aims without interference.
2. The class struggle is messy. The ongoing drive by the workers to take power out of the capitalists’ hands is an international one. The stronger the workers become, the more acquiescent to the working class’s power on one hand, and the more jealous of their political control on the other, the capitalists become, and the weaker the privileged bureaucratic castes in the workers’ states whose power reflects the counterrevolutionary pressure of the capitalist class become.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. Indeed, the primary purpose of it is to destroy the freedom to be left wing so that the right can achieve its aims without interference.
2. The class struggle is messy. The ongoing drive by the workers to take power out of the capitalists’ hands is an international one. The stronger the workers become, the more acquiescent to the working class’s power on one hand, and the more jealous of their political control on the other, the capitalists become, and the weaker the privileged bureaucratic castes in the workers’ states whose power reflects the counterrevolutionary pressure of the capitalist class become.
1. How is that different from this:


Lets not pretend your aims are the "pure" ones.

2. "Class struggle" is perpetual - the strong prey on the weak, whether is capitalists or communists running the show.
 

EatTheRich

President
1. How is that different from this:


Lets not pretend your aims are the "pure" ones.

2. "Class struggle" is perpetual - the strong prey on the weak, whether is capitalists or communists running the show.
1. Well, the Bolsheviks restricted the freedom of the capitalists in order to put workers in power.
2. Yes. In the capitalist states the capitalists are strong and prey on the workers and farmers, while in the socialist states the workers and farmers are strong and prey on the capitalists.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. Well, the Bolsheviks restricted the freedom of the capitalists in order to put workers in power.
2. Yes. In the capitalist states the capitalists are strong and prey on the workers and farmers, while in the socialist states the workers and farmers are strong and prey on the capitalists.
Which is why they all end up economic basket cases...
 
Top