Know this if you know nothing else about Democrats —— Communists are not about saving lives through humanitarian interventions. They are about giving the U.N. authority over America’s military. Turning the U.S. military into a universal police force controlled by the United Nations is precisely what Socialists/Communists have been after since 1945. They will say and do whatever it takes to get there.
Why did the U.N. spent decades telling the U.S. Military where it fights, and what it fights for? Nation building is the answer. —— nation building meaning democracy.
The United Nations failed at turning the U.S. military into a universal police force. Rather than stop trying, the New World Order crowd decided to increase the number of NATO countries and slowly transfer United Nations military objectives to NATO. (Every totalitarian ideology must include control of the military.)
Aside from accusing others of the crimes they are guilty of the Democrat Party is the Party of Traitors. Proof: Defending the Soviet Union before and after the Cold War, open-borders, support for every item in the U.N.’s global government agenda, hatred for the U.S. Military, handing Iran a sweetheart deal that included nuclear weapons, bringing defeat to their own country in Vietnam, The U.S. military never lost a battle in Vietnam, yet American Communists gave their country the worst political defeat in this country’s history.
I can go on and on, but everybody with an ounce of sense already knows which party is the party of traitors.
Way back in 1994 there was talk in Washington about closing West Point and Annapolis. The story back then was that those military academies were no longer necessary. General Milley proves they are necessary and indispensable.
I want to elaborate on ROTC officers versus service academy officers.
I remember thinking at the time that Democrat doublespeak meant they wanted military officers loyal to the New World Order crowd rather than loyal to the country. They are still trying.
QUESTION: Why do we need a merchant marine? ANSWER: We do not. It makes no sense to stop training military officers to defend the United States against enemies it does have, while continuing to train people to work on ships this country does not have. If Democrats ever close the service academies they should also close the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy in Kings Point, New York et al. since this country no longer has a merchant fleet worth mentioning.
Luckily, closing the service academies went nowhere, but I would still like to hear from the people who first proposed closing the military academies. In light of North Korea, and the undeclared war against Islam, the Democrat Party’s song & dance would be entertaining at the very least.
During the Obama years talk about closing the service academies reached a fever pitch because Democrats hate anything that strengthens duty, honor, country in the officer corps.
The Chicago sewer rat purging the military of loyal officers was an incremental substitute until the service academies could be closed so the first loyalty of staff officer would be to the United Nations not to the their country.
The federal government, and the U.S. military, have been thoroughly infiltrated by the very type of person the country was warned about in the Army-McCarthy hearings (1954).
The most perverse joke of all is that politicians who wanted to close the service academies portrayed graduates as freeloaders —— which is exactly what Democrats are. The truth is that closing the service academies was meant to end up with every high-ranking military officer indoctrinated in America-hating institutions of higher learning:
Unlike most public colleges and universities that are “only” subsidized to the tune of 40-70 percent (not counting the subsidy within the student loan programs), and where students must nonetheless pay the difference in tuition, the military academies are 100 percent taxpayer funded. Moreover, they are subject to no serious oversight and no one asks if any of them achieve their stated goals of churning out the country’s most educated and brilliant students.
Training is something the military does—education, certainly, is not. Indeed, undergraduate education of officers has already largely been outsourced, since most new officers come from the much cheaper Reserve Officer Training Corps programs at civilian universities (at one-quarter the cost of the academies), or from the several months of Officer Training Corps (one-eighth the cost) that follows either an enlisted career, or college. By all standards, these officers are just as good as those who come from the service academies, which now produce under 20 percent of U.S. officers…
The academies function as propaganda mills for military “tradition” and exist to turn out a new generation of influential government employees who will call for even more money to be spent on their alma maters.
Loyalty to the United Nations is what the country got from Obama’s military traitors.
You will never find anybody from Officer Training Corps programs educated by the Department of Education who believe “Duty, Honor, Country” (especially country). Those are not the words U.N.-lovers want to hear from staff officers.
What do you think closing the service academies was all about? I can tell that it was not about efficiency, nor was it about sexual misconduct as Scott Shuger’s article suggests, and it sure as hell was not proposed by liberals because West Point, Annapolis, and the Air Force Academy are hotbeds of Communist activity.
This country is better because of The Long Gray Line. Can Democrats say the American people will be better off when every military officer is like General Mark Milley?
Serving the U.N. encompasses serving U.N. member states. Many of those states are America’s foreign enemies. There is no denying that fact. No one can serve the U.N. and claim they are only serving America’s friends.
As I pointed out many times, Communists have been infiltrating the U.S. military since the end of WW II. Even with a substantial portion of U.N.-loving officers in positions of authority, enlisted personnel still have to fight for the U.N. Today’s enlisted personnel cannot be sure where their immediate superiors stand. Indeed, they can no longer be sure where the commander in chief’s loyalties reside. Clinton was bad enough, Obama was worse than Clinton. Biden is worse than Obama.
Why did the U.N. spent decades telling the U.S. Military where it fights, and what it fights for? Nation building is the answer. —— nation building meaning democracy.
The United Nations failed at turning the U.S. military into a universal police force. Rather than stop trying, the New World Order crowd decided to increase the number of NATO countries and slowly transfer United Nations military objectives to NATO. (Every totalitarian ideology must include control of the military.)
Aside from accusing others of the crimes they are guilty of the Democrat Party is the Party of Traitors. Proof: Defending the Soviet Union before and after the Cold War, open-borders, support for every item in the U.N.’s global government agenda, hatred for the U.S. Military, handing Iran a sweetheart deal that included nuclear weapons, bringing defeat to their own country in Vietnam, The U.S. military never lost a battle in Vietnam, yet American Communists gave their country the worst political defeat in this country’s history.
I can go on and on, but everybody with an ounce of sense already knows which party is the party of traitors.
Way back in 1994 there was talk in Washington about closing West Point and Annapolis. The story back then was that those military academies were no longer necessary. General Milley proves they are necessary and indispensable.
I want to elaborate on ROTC officers versus service academy officers.
I remember thinking at the time that Democrat doublespeak meant they wanted military officers loyal to the New World Order crowd rather than loyal to the country. They are still trying.
QUESTION: Why do we need a merchant marine? ANSWER: We do not. It makes no sense to stop training military officers to defend the United States against enemies it does have, while continuing to train people to work on ships this country does not have. If Democrats ever close the service academies they should also close the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy in Kings Point, New York et al. since this country no longer has a merchant fleet worth mentioning.
Luckily, closing the service academies went nowhere, but I would still like to hear from the people who first proposed closing the military academies. In light of North Korea, and the undeclared war against Islam, the Democrat Party’s song & dance would be entertaining at the very least.
During the Obama years talk about closing the service academies reached a fever pitch because Democrats hate anything that strengthens duty, honor, country in the officer corps.
The Chicago sewer rat purging the military of loyal officers was an incremental substitute until the service academies could be closed so the first loyalty of staff officer would be to the United Nations not to the their country.
The federal government, and the U.S. military, have been thoroughly infiltrated by the very type of person the country was warned about in the Army-McCarthy hearings (1954).
The most perverse joke of all is that politicians who wanted to close the service academies portrayed graduates as freeloaders —— which is exactly what Democrats are. The truth is that closing the service academies was meant to end up with every high-ranking military officer indoctrinated in America-hating institutions of higher learning:
Unlike most public colleges and universities that are “only” subsidized to the tune of 40-70 percent (not counting the subsidy within the student loan programs), and where students must nonetheless pay the difference in tuition, the military academies are 100 percent taxpayer funded. Moreover, they are subject to no serious oversight and no one asks if any of them achieve their stated goals of churning out the country’s most educated and brilliant students.
Training is something the military does—education, certainly, is not. Indeed, undergraduate education of officers has already largely been outsourced, since most new officers come from the much cheaper Reserve Officer Training Corps programs at civilian universities (at one-quarter the cost of the academies), or from the several months of Officer Training Corps (one-eighth the cost) that follows either an enlisted career, or college. By all standards, these officers are just as good as those who come from the service academies, which now produce under 20 percent of U.S. officers…
The academies function as propaganda mills for military “tradition” and exist to turn out a new generation of influential government employees who will call for even more money to be spent on their alma maters.
Close the Military Academies - LRC Blog
Unlike most public colleges and universities that are “only” subsidized to the tune of 40-70 percent (not counting the subsidy within the student loan programs), and where students must nonetheless pay the difference in tuition, the military academies are 100 percent taxpayer funded. Moreover...
www.lewrockwell.com
Loyalty to the United Nations is what the country got from Obama’s military traitors.
You will never find anybody from Officer Training Corps programs educated by the Department of Education who believe “Duty, Honor, Country” (especially country). Those are not the words U.N.-lovers want to hear from staff officers.
General Douglas MacArthur's Farewell Speech to West Point - 1962
General Douglas MacArthur's Farewell Speech Given to the Corps of Cadets at West Point May 12, 1962 General Westmoreland, General Groves, distinguished guests, and gentlemen of the Corps. As I was leaving the hotel this morning, a doorman asked me, "Where are you bound for, General?" an
nationalcenter.org
What do you think closing the service academies was all about? I can tell that it was not about efficiency, nor was it about sexual misconduct as Scott Shuger’s article suggests, and it sure as hell was not proposed by liberals because West Point, Annapolis, and the Air Force Academy are hotbeds of Communist activity.
This country is better because of The Long Gray Line. Can Democrats say the American people will be better off when every military officer is like General Mark Milley?
Serving the U.N. encompasses serving U.N. member states. Many of those states are America’s foreign enemies. There is no denying that fact. No one can serve the U.N. and claim they are only serving America’s friends.
As I pointed out many times, Communists have been infiltrating the U.S. military since the end of WW II. Even with a substantial portion of U.N.-loving officers in positions of authority, enlisted personnel still have to fight for the U.N. Today’s enlisted personnel cannot be sure where their immediate superiors stand. Indeed, they can no longer be sure where the commander in chief’s loyalties reside. Clinton was bad enough, Obama was worse than Clinton. Biden is worse than Obama.