and only job they can get it pouring coffee!Good for her. 40% of Starbucks workers are college graduates.
Let's guess, Liberal Arts Degrees
and only job they can get it pouring coffee!Good for her. 40% of Starbucks workers are college graduates.
So..union will never work...Good for her. 40% of Starbucks workers are college graduates.
Yours evidentlyLink? What makes for a “shit degree”?
Questions like that may explain why you have such a difficult time finding gainful employment.Link? What makes for a “shit degree”?
Because I think for myself rather than uncritically swallow what I’m fed? You may be right.Questions like that may explain why you have such a difficult time finding gainful employment.
They usually want pharma experience but I have applied to a couple places. My job search is centered on academia and related things and on administration (for example HHS) but I am looking at what is out there. I overlooked a lot of jobs starting out because I thought “background check” meant political reliability screening but it sounds like a lot of the time they just see if you have a rap sheet.try pharma.
Uh....ok..They usually want pharma experience but I have applied to a couple places. My job search is centered on academia and related things and on administration (for example HHS) but I am looking at what is out there. I overlooked a lot of jobs starting out because I thought “background check” meant political reliability screening but it sounds like a lot of the time they just see if you have a rap sheet.
No. Just rationalizing why you demand sacrifice from others while making none of your own.A crucial distinction made.
No, what I demand is the relinquishing of class-based advantage, to the end of ending mass poverty and war.No. Just rationalizing why you demand sacrifice from others while making none of your own.
And for no good purpose to boot.
Your "demand" and $5 will get someone a cup of Starbucks coffee and keep a degreed barista earning a paycheck.No, what I demand is the relinquishing of class-based advantage, to the end of ending mass poverty and war.
then relinquish it, and leave everyone alone.No, what I demand is the relinquishing of class-based advantage, to the end of ending mass poverty and war.
Communism has never even put a dent in poverty...Capitalism works much better. Poor people in this country often own cell phones, poor people elsewhere starve to death in large numbers. Your plan would bring that here.No, what I demand is the relinquishing of class-based advantage, to the end of ending mass poverty and war.
Communism puts huge dents in poverty... Communists remove and kill everyone who speaks about being poor... hence no poverty.Communism has never even put a dent in poverty...Capitalism works much better. Poor people in this country often own cell phones, poor people elsewhere starve to death in large numbers. Your plan would bring that here.
So, no. Communism remains an enormous expensive failure.
The theory of communism is to put the control and distribution of all wealth in the hands of a select few...What could go wrong?Communism puts huge dents in poverty... Communists remove and kill everyone who speaks about being poor... hence no poverty.
Look at north korea... some 1/2 of their population has intestinal parasites and more than that is malnourished..but say anything other than cheering for dumb Un....and poof..they whack you and your family...
Most of the poor people starving are in capitalist countries like Yemen, whose poverty is constitutive of the U.S.’s relative wealth. If not for communism we would all (save the ruling wealthy) still be in the condition of the poorest people in the capitalist world.Communism has never even put a dent in poverty...Capitalism works much better. Poor people in this country often own cell phones, poor people elsewhere starve to death in large numbers. Your plan would bring that here.
So, no. Communism remains an enormous expensive failure.
I am not of the propertied classesthen relinquish it, and leave everyone alone.
No, the idea behind communism is taking that control out of the hands of a select few and dispersing it among the masses. But when a communist revolution stalls and begins to go backward, in the inevitable ebb and flow of the revolutionary advance, during the period before communism’s maturity socialist countries will inevitably reproduce capitalistic elements such as concentration of power in the hands of enemies of the revolution such as Stalin or Mao. But 60 years of communism in Cuba proved that as international revolution advances the degeneration can be pushed back for a long time even if inevitably counterrevolution will take hold if the revolution doesn’t seize power in other countries.The theory of communism is to put the control and distribution of all wealth in the hands of a select few...What could go wrong?
Inevitably, along comes a Mao or a Stalin, and the ensuing mass graves and re-education camps.
Every. Single. Time.
And it only took being the 5th-most bombed country in history, all-out war including biological weapons by a coalition of the most powerful countries in the world, 70 years of Cold War following the ceasefire, and a political leadership that functioned as an internal fifth column by containing and undermining the revolution (in the fruitless hope of being allowed to develop in peace) to create that state of affairs.Communism puts huge dents in poverty... Communists remove and kill everyone who speaks about being poor... hence no poverty.
Look at north korea... some 1/2 of their population has intestinal parasites and more than that is malnourished..but say anything other than cheering for dumb Un....and poof..they whack you and your family...
I meant your class based advantageI am not of the propertied classes
I'm sure a diet of soil and grass, coupled with intestinal parasites, and violent oppression of dissent is quite preferable..,.And it only took being the 5th-most bombed country in history, all-out war including biological weapons by a coalition of the most powerful countries in the world, 70 years of Cold War following the ceasefire, and a political leadership that functioned as an internal fifth column by containing and undermining the revolution (in the fruitless hope of being allowed to develop in peace) to create that state of affairs.
And N. Korea is still better off than it had been under capitalism.