slavery and related abuses are NOT unique to america. for further information try googling
1 "100 million indians died under british colonial rule"
2. "the roman empire"
3. "nazi forced labor camps"
4. "Russian forced labor camps and goolags"
5. "chinas cultural revolution"
6. north korea's forced labor camps"
7. "1 million uighars in china's forced labor camps"
8. Japans sex slave comfort girls for troops during world war 2
Okay then, tell me in which of those places was it the law that a man could rape a woman, then take that rape victim's child away from her (his own child as well) and then sell that child at auction, or your grandson by your son, if he were the rapist, under the laws of that nation ?
Except, the concept of consent does exist for a person who has no rights. So they weren't rapist. They were good citizens helping expand the prosperity of the nation and enjoying their freedom to do so.
Where else in the ****ing world did savagery like that go on ?
1 "100 million indians died under british colonial rule"
Yes, but at least when they did their home invasion robbery of India, unlike Africa, they didn't then take the people of India and sell them to the Americans.
3. "nazi forced labor camps"
4. "Russian forced labor camps and goolags"
5. "chinas cultural revolution"
6. north korea's forced labor camps"
7. "1 million uighars in china's forced labor camps"
I suggest you read our Constitution.
We still allow the very kind of slavery in those above examples.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction
8. Japans sex slave comfort girls for troops during world war 2
Nor did they take the child born from Japanese rape and sell them.