Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
What's a pedant?Whats a phybil?
What's a pedant?Whats a phybil?
Nothing, never mind, go back to sleep...it's still 2018.What "new information"?
Depends. How are you applying it ..What's a pedant?
The burden of proof lies with the deniers.Right now, the deniers don't have evidence to say the claimers are wrong and the claimers don't have the evidence to prove the deniers wrong.
So you have noneNothing, never mind, go back to sleep...it's still 2018.
Except that there was evidence to refute the flat earthers. Just go out to sea.Guessing as more comes out and details get released from both Elon Musk and the Republican House committees, we'll find out if there's any "there" there.
Remember when we were told if we'd get the vaccine we wouldn't get the virus?
That the NSA wasn't is storing and spying on everything sent across the internet. Then Snowden came out and told us how they were doing it and suddenly Google etc started encrypting all their inter-server communications and https was universally pushed?
How Watergate started out as a conspiracy theory, but gained enough evidence to tun into the scandal that we all know today?
Many things that are considered a conspiracy theory turn out to be spoiler alerts. Let it play out and those who end up being correct get to call the others "flat earthers"...simple as that.
Right now, the deniers don't have evidence to say the claimers are wrong and the claimers don't have the evidence to prove the deniers wrong.
For one side to ask for evidence from the other to prove their theory is like Pythagoras being asked for evidence the earth was spherical.
So, what you're saying is it was okay for the FBI to express their opinion without evidence...and to live by the story...that the laptop was Russian disinformation; they weren't required to present their evidence proving it wasn't.Really? They lied? No. They expressed an opinion. They actually stated that they had no evidence of Russian involvement, but that it looked like what they had seen in the past.
That's like claiming the earth actually was flat until it was proven otherwise.Except that there was evidence to refute the flat earthers. Just go out to sea.
You have nothing at all to back you up.
And would that have changed any votes in 2020?That's like claiming the earth actually was flat until it was proven otherwise.
I have nothing to back up, I haven't said the laptop will prove one thing or another. I'm actually on record in post #205 saying...
"Guessing as more comes out and details get released from both Elon Musk and the Republican House committees, we'll find out if there's any "there" there."
I haven't come down on either side of this debate...I'll wait to see what all the evidence provides. It does make eyebrows raise that many of the people that have pushed the narrative have been either arrested or raided, but Hunter Biden hasn't been arrested for violating firearms laws, when there zero debate he broke the law when he lied on the background check.
Hunter Biden Reportedly Violated Federal Law by Lying on Background Check
Hunter Biden may have committed a felony offense by lying on a background check before purchasing a gun, Politico reported on Thursday. Biden answered “no” in response to the question “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any...news.yahoo.com
When did the FBI say the laptop was disinformation?So, what you're saying is it was okay for the FBI to express their opinion without evidence...and to live by the story...that the laptop was Russian disinformation; they weren't required to present their evidence proving it wasn't.
However, it's absolutely necessary for posters on here to provide evidence our they're dumbasses for not doing so.
It's only okay to have an opinion without evidence so long as it matches what you want to believe...
Gotcha...
Would what have changed any votes?And would that have changed any votes in 2020?
My response was to your hypocritical response. I'm responding to what you wrote...that it was okay for the FBI to have an opinion without evidence because it matches what you wish to believe...but nobody can have an opinion the laptop possibly containing information about Joe Biden doing something illegal because they have no evidence.When did the FBI say the laptop was disinformation?
Reaction to the Hunter Biden laptop story perfectly illustrates how the elite media have given up doing their job (msn.com)My response was to your hypocritical response. I'm responding to what you wrote...that it was okay for the FBI to have an opinion without evidence because it matches what you wish to believe...but nobody can have an opinion the laptop possibly containing information about Joe Biden doing something illegal because they have no evidence.
Laughing your ass off tonight. Me too.What did Durham find? Oh, nothing?
Unreal. When did the FBI make the public staement that the laptop was Russian disinfo?My response was to your hypocritical response. I'm responding to what you wrote...that it was okay for the FBI to have an opinion without evidence because it matches what you wish to believe...but nobody can have an opinion the laptop possibly containing information about Joe Biden doing something illegal because they have no evidence.
Over and over. It's easy peasy...Ahhh! No proof of stolen election or voter fraud, so PJCon diverts the thread to Hunter's laptop. You won @PhilFish
This from someone who is passing around that article as if it is evidence of anythng.only really dim, and retarded people, think the russian influence is something new...or that the US doesnt engage in it too...