What is it you want from me? We know for a fact that the "intelligence" people as well as the FBI lied about Hunter's laptop to provide a convenient cover narrative for the legacy media and tech platforms to censor coverage of it. Those are facts. You don't consider that in any way nefarious or a "meddling" in the election. I get that...we're done.
You still don't seem to know the difference between facts and opinions.
It is your opinion that the 50 intelligence officials lied. The fact is that they offered their opinion of the NYPost article and actually stated that they had no evidence to back them up, but that it had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.
It is your opinion that the FBI lied about Hunter's laptop. Do you have any evidence of that? What they did was warn Facebook and Twitter that they should be on the lookout for disinformation from foreign sources. Do you have any evidence the FBI contacted "legacy media"? Nope. But in your opinion, they somehow gave those organization cover.
Given that there is nothing that has come from the NYPost article or the investigation by a Trump appointed prosecutor that would have changed a single vote, how in hell can you claim anyone meddled in the election.
The Russians conducted a massive social media campaign to favor Trump in 2016, but it is unlikely that they changed a single vote. Likewise, the laptop would not have helped Trump.