New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

TP for wee widdle posters who can't support their contentions

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
oh my bad....that wasnt you jumping on the get a life routine with the 'he watching his boy on video' routine?
eh, he posted that's what he does
he damn sure never leaves the safe room with video

would you enjoy a job where the daddy, states away, watched your every move via video while working for the son_______
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
eh, he posted that's what he does
he damn sure never leaves the safe room with video

would you enjoy a job where the daddy, states away, watched your every move via video while working for the son_______
Still not able to post on topic. Can't seem to tell the truth, Either
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
No, "me" says the data doesn't support your "fact" in that there is largely no difference in infection levels between areas that masked and those that didn't. And LOL, way to move the goalposts - the mandatory masking was sold on the basis of covid being AN AIRBORNE VIRUS. We could get it simply by breathing the air exhaled by the infected, or so we were told. Now its "larger particulate matter and droplets?" We can protect ourselves from that by simple hand washing, like we have done with every contagious disease since the 1800s. And, in case you haven't noticed, China, which has hands down the strictest forced masking and quarantining regime ever employed, currently has a (conservatively estimated) quarter billion cases. Your "facts" are bullshit.
Simply untrue. Mask mandates verifiably reduced infection levels.
The Effectiveness Of Government Masking Mandates On COVID-19 County-Level Case Incidence Across The United States, 2020 | Health Affairs

China has had 1.9 million all-time Covid cases.
COVID-19 Data Explorer - Our World in Data
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
I don't dispute any of them, other than the claim that there wasn't prolific use of "ballot harvesting."


There's Reuters "debunking" it...by pointing out that it is perfectly legal (when done properly). Indeed, but how do they know it was "done properly?" They, like you, cite "lack of evidence of ballot fraud." But how do they know everyone involved followed all of the letters of every law? They don't, but, like you, that doesn't stop them from claiming they do.
So even though you have no evidence at all of widespread ballot harvesting, you continue to post not only that there was, but that it illegally or corruptly changed the results of the election.
1. If ballot harvesting took place, the only person who may have violated election law is the person collecting ballots. The voter still cast a legal vote.
2. D'Souza failed to show any evidence of ballot harvesting. In fact, he lied. Cell phone GPS is not as accurate as he claimed, as proven by links I provided to researchers who were tasked with testing various phones in 2019.

Let us know when you actually have some evidence.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
So even though you have no evidence at all of widespread ballot harvesting, you continue to post not only that there was, but that it illegally or corruptly changed the results of the election.
1. If ballot harvesting took place, the only person who may have violated election law is the person collecting ballots. The voter still cast a legal vote.
2. D'Souza failed to show any evidence of ballot harvesting. In fact, he lied. Cell phone GPS is not as accurate as he claimed, as proven by links I provided to researchers who were tasked with testing various phones in 2019.

Let us know when you actually have some evidence.
I have the outcome of the election, whereby suddenly in the middle of election night, representatives from the heavily democratic precincts show up with bushel baskets of "absentee ballots" that put unpopular democrats into office.

1. Yeah, so what? Do we really want our politicians elected by people who really don't give a sh*t if they voted?
2. Again, so what? He still showed these people were repeatedly visiting the vicinity of the drop boxes. Does it prove they were putting votes into the drop boxes? No, but it does make you wonder what they were doing.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
From your link:

On average, the daily case incidence per 100,000 people in masked counties compared with unmasked counties declined by 25 percent at four weeks, 35 percent at six weeks, and 18 percent across six weeks postintervention.

Did the pandemic only last six weeks? Of course, that is absurd. These mask mandates were typically implemented just before summer, when cases naturally wane. So they stop before the fall data would demonstrate explosive case growth while these mandates were still in effect. You have data, you just don't have good data.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
waaaait a minute.... i get it.. you are so f'ed in the head...you think the mere mention of the letters CDC is an affirmation of a position in the absolute. lol. i get it now.


sooo cute. your bar is waaaaay lower than i thought.
And yet still so far above yours...
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
oh my bad....that wasnt you jumping on the get a life routine with the 'he watching his boy on video' routine?
Exactly, it wasn't anything of "get a life"
and neither of us have "161,002" post is why I questioned the #
Mine are higher due to I don't post anywhere but in PJ and I'm not here 24/7 w/lower post counts.............hummmmmmmmmm

MV is suppose to be grown and surely doesn't need defending?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
I have the outcome of the election, whereby suddenly in the middle of election night, representatives from the heavily democratic precincts show up with bushel baskets of "absentee ballots" that put unpopular democrats into office.

1. Yeah, so what? Do we really want our politicians elected by people who really don't give a sh*t if they voted?
2. Again, so what? He still showed these people were repeatedly visiting the vicinity of the drop boxes. Does it prove they were putting votes into the drop boxes? No, but it does make you wonder what they were doing.
The outcome of the election is determined by the final count of ballots...not after only the in person votes have been tallied. In most states the absentee ballots are not counted until all in person votes have been counted. You know that. It has been pointed out to you on number of threads.

You allege that people who really don't give a shit have elected someone. Of course, you have no evidence of that, but continue to post it.

What D'souza showed was that some people were within 30 feet of a ballot box on a number of occasions. He did not show they had ballots or that they put ballots in the drop boxes. He said GPS data was accurate to within inches. He lied. He claimed the "mules" were being paid by some unnamed non-profit. He has failed to name the non-profit. He claimed to have video of the same people visiting multiple drop boxes, but his movie doesn't show that. I can only presume that he was lying.

Why didn't he name one single mule? Why didn't he name the non-profit?

No, it doesn't make me wonder at all. Our nearest drop box is at the entrance to the Rec center where I go every day to work out. Do you see my point?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Exactly, it wasn't anything of "get a life"
and neither of us have "161,002" post is why I questioned the #
Mine are higher due to I don't post anywhere but in PJ and I'm not here 24/7 w/lower post counts.............hummmmmmmmmm

MV is suppose to be grown and surely doesn't need defending?
I especially don't need a defense from you. I think he is actually pointing out what a troll you are.
 
Top