Breaking, now pence is found to have had classified docs. Let the histrionic shrieking begin anew!!!!

[Sickofleft]

How does anyone justify anything by using Adam Schiff a verified lying POS talking about "Russian Disinformation"...... someone who is still lying and denying the whole thing.

Funny thing. Here is what I found that Schiff had to say in October 2020. Odd that he would comment about a laptop story that had been suppressed by the media...eh?

Schiff in a Friday interview with CNN said the “smear” campaign against Biden and his ties to Ukraine originated as part of a Russian disinformation plot more than a year ago, but he did not explicitly link the Kremlin efforts to the Post story.

Ratcliffe, Schiff battle over Biden emails, politicized intelligence

Director of National Intelligence (DNI) John Ratcliffe and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) are publicly battling over the emails allegedly recovered from a laptop belon…

thehill.com

He did not mention the laptop. Let me know if you find anything else to back up McCarthy's crap.

There are several media appearances where Schiff claimed that he had seen ample evidence of "Russian Collusion", there was NO such evidence. There was his famous "Memo" which was complete and utter bullshit.....

We also have a former Sec. of State who stated that he knows for a fact that Schiff leaked classified information to the press. A

Nobody has done as much damage to the country since Joe McCarthy as Adam Schiff has done. Not only should he (thankfully has been) drummed off any and all committees, he should not even be in Congress.

 

[Sickofleft]

Your answers have been debunked, you keep posting the Senate Report as if nothing has been learned since. You have been shown the information that Brennan suppressed the Russian efforts to help Clinton and when you don't have shit (as usual) you ask for it again.

The Russians did NOT hack the DNC. The only thing silly is you still defending a lie you have been told.

The point is not that "they tried" the point is your corrupt party made up entire story around it in order to undermine a duly elected POTUS.

Right, Flynn and Page added "motivation to the investigation" right it's all their fault that a FISA court was lied to repeatedly, that a FBI interview report was re-written in order to destroy a political opponents life......... it was not the insurance policy the FBI put in place..... it was all Flynn's and Pages fault for not being members of the Regime......

Fascist much?

Lie more below.

You ignore the answers I provide to your bullshit. Once again...

Where is your supporting evidence that Brennan said anything like there were just as many fake media accounts supporting Clinton? You keep posting that, but have never proven it.

The is no evidence that the Russian media crap changed any votes. That isn't relevant. The point is they tried.

Nobody said Page claiming to be a Kremlin advisor or going to Russia to speak with the Russian deputy prime minister was a crime. It added motivation for the investigation.

Nobody said Flynn getting paid to have dinner with Putin was a crime. It was reason to question Russia's interest in helping Trump win.
Your denial of the hack of the DNC is silly.

This is from page 170, section B: of the Senate intelligence committee. Both republicans and democrats.
The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin directed the hack-and-leak campaign targeting the DNC, DCCC, and the Clinton Campaign. Moscow's intent was to damage the Clinton Campaign and tarnish what it expected might be a Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican
nominee, and generally undermine the U.S. democratic process. The Committee's findings are based on a variety of information, including raw intelligence reporting.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

 

[middleview]

Your answers have been debunked, you keep posting the Senate Report as if nothing has been learned since. You have been shown the information that Brennan suppressed the Russian efforts to help Clinton and when you don't have shit (as usual) you ask for it again.

The Russians did NOT hack the DNC. The only thing silly is you still defending a lie you have been told.

The point is not that "they tried" the point is your corrupt party made up entire story around it in order to undermine a duly elected POTUS.

Right, Flynn and Page added "motivation to the investigation" right it's all their fault that a FISA court was lied to repeatedly, that a FBI interview report was re-written in order to destroy a political opponents life......... it was not the insurance policy the FBI put in place..... it was all Flynn's and Pages fault for not being members of the Regime......

Fascist much?

Lie more below.

And again...posting a bunch of crap without a single link to back you up.

 

[middleview]

How does anyone justify anything by using Adam Schiff a verified lying POS talking about "Russian Disinformation"...... someone who is still lying and denying the whole thing.



There are several media appearances where Schiff claimed that he had seen ample evidence of "Russian Collusion", there was NO such evidence. There was his famous "Memo" which was complete and utter bullshit.....

We also have a former Sec. of State who stated that he knows for a fact that Schiff leaked classified information to the press. A

Nobody has done as much damage to the country since Joe McCarthy as Adam Schiff has done. Not only should he (thankfully has been) drummed off any and all committees, he should not even be in Congress.

No links? Again. Why do you bother?

 

[Jack4freedom]

I disagree with your assessment.

It was a phony dossier, ginned up on a phony premise, by a sore loser and her minions.

I don't give it any weight - If you wish to take it as Gospel, that's fine by me. I won't be joining you.

I'm not running or hiding, but I have grown weary of beating a dead horse. I have no desire to alter your opinion on this subject in anyway, and I also am not going to cave to what you choose to believe. It just doesn't matter, and there are far more important and relevant topics to discuss.

Nice spin move. I did not say one thing about Steele or any dossier. Read the post you responded to.

 

[Jack4freedom]

No links? Again. Why do you bother?

She hears this stuff on Hannity almost every day.

 

[Zam-Zam]

Nice spin move. I did not say one thing about Steele or any dossier. Read the post you responded to.

My comment was on the Steel dossier. If you wish to discuss something else not related, fine by me.

I'm rather bored with all the Trump stuff - I really don't care what becomes of him one way or another. For those who are obsessed with him, I imagine that is a difficult concept to comprehend.

My opinion on this should not be important to you. Your opinion on this, or anyone else's, is not important to me. If you wish to double-down and insist, you can do that, but it still won't matter.

It's all good.

 

[Alinvegas]

Really? Murder is the same as taking documents.
First...you just offered that both of us killed someone. So what would denial have to do with anything. Both would have to be investigated.

Second...Documents were taken from the White House and VP office and residence. Biden says he did not take them, but someone clearly selected documents and put them in a box, ignoring the fact that government documents are not the property of the Ex-president or Ex-VP. Added to that there were classified documents in the mix.

One of us admits to having removed those documents. The other says he knew nothing of the documents being removed.

Are you beginning to understand the difference? All three would have to be investigated.

OK my twist. You know good a well I wasn't trying to make a comparison between murder and taking documents. however since you want to make excuses for only the left, you can't defend what biden did...

 

[Alinvegas]

so you want to throw Pence in prison now too then ? your logic at work

Another twister...

 

[middleview]

OK my twist. You know good a well I wasn't trying to make a comparison between murder and taking documents. however since you want to make excuses for only the left, you can't defend what biden did...

Can you defend either Trump or Pence?
I have not excused any of the three. I have posted we need to await the outcome of investigations.

 

[Alinvegas]

Can you defend either Trump or Pence?
I have not excused any of the three. I have posted we need to await the outcome of investigations.

You are the one that is trying to tell us that what Trump did is worse that what Biden did because Biden turned himself in. I call bullshit. Biden did not turn himself in and has hidden some of these docs for more than 15 years.

 

[middleview]

You are the one that is trying to tell us that what Trump did is worse that what Biden did because Biden turned himself in. I call bullshit. Biden did not turn himself in and has hidden some of these docs for more than 15 years.

What Trump did was attempt to keep documents that were clearly not his to keep. He even lied about having them.

Biden's lawyer contacted NARA and returned the documents they found without the need for a search warrant or supoena.

Intent matters. While you claim Biden hid documents for 15 years, I call bullshit. There is a difference between hiding them and not knowing they were there.

Intent matters and will be investigated by the DOJ. What matters is identifying who selected documents to be packed up to be taken. I'll wait to find out.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

You are the one that is trying to tell us that what Trump did is worse that what Biden did because Biden turned himself in. I call bullshit. Biden did not turn himself in and has hidden some of these docs for more than 15 years.

The latest idiocy from the right wing echo chamber - Biden “hid” documents even if he wasn’t aware of them.

;-)

 

[Alinvegas]

What Trump did was attempt to keep documents that were clearly not his to keep. He even lied about having them.

Biden's lawyer contacted NARA and returned the documents they found without the need for a search warrant or supoena.

Intent matters. While you claim Biden hid documents for 15 years, I call bullshit. There is a difference between hiding them and not knowing they were there.

Intent matters and will be investigated by the DOJ. What matters is identifying who selected documents to be packed up to be taken. I'll wait to find out.

The law says intent doesn't matter.

 

[PhilFish]

The law says intent doesn't matter.

Pence indicates his intent was to give them back to be secured. Boop. There it is

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

The law says intent doesn't matter.

Completely false. The right wing echo chamber sure is doing a job on its droids.

 

[middleview]

The law says intent doesn't matter.

What law?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

What law?

The “law” the right wing echo chamber tells them about. They have clearly never read the actual law.

 

[middleview]

The “law” the right wing echo chamber tells them about. They have clearly never read the actual law.

Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

 

[Sickofleft]

When he gets his ass kicked, the strategy is to once again ask for links (he will ignore them) and he will re-post all his bullshit slightly re-worded.

The lying has no end for the self righteous virtue signaling morons.

No links? Again. Why do you bother?