Where did Soros say "Lesser European peoples"?
Not surprising at all that this has come to light...
- Thread starter Raoul_Luke
- Start date
And yet you are not averse to making shit up. He never said that Eastern European citizens were lesser human beings, as you put in quotes.
The interpretation of what Soros wrote was conveniently taken out of context. Try reading the whole paper Soros wrote.
George Soros | Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO
He is talking about the Nato of 1993 being willing to fight in the non-Nato countries in the face of Russian violence as we have seen in Georgia, Chechnya and now Ukraine.
Last edited:
So what you have here is that Soros set up an NGO in Ukraine to help establish a democracy in Ukraine as he saw the USSR collapsing. You and Headline USA imply some nefarious intent and so substance to back it up.
Where it comes to Soros, all that is needed is to interpret his actions in a way that would lead the reader to think there is proof of something. There isn't.
Headline USA?
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Headline USA far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, and a false claim.
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Headline USA - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
LOL! I quoted them, well, quoting Soros. Are you disputing the veracity of the Soros "position paper?" Because if not, suggesting that the source of an accurate report on it is reason enough to reject it is, well, the move of an authoritarian supporting hack.So what you have here is that Soros set up an NGO in Ukraine to help establish a democracy in Ukraine as he saw the USSR collapsing. You and Headline USA imply some nefarious intent and so substance to back it up.
Where it comes to Soros, all that is needed is to interpret his actions in a way that would lead the reader to think there is proof of something. There isn't.
Headline USA?
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Detailed Report
- Overall, we rate Headline USA far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, and a false claim.
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Headline USA - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
I reject their interpretation of what was said.
RickWA
Snagglesooth
LOL. Lies straight away. How awful for you (but it is your template).
My many critiques of Trump typically cite is horrible misogyny, unrivaled nepotism, serial lack of discipline and self-indulgence, and so forth. You lisping leftists, however, focus on his being fat, his hairdoo, and the varied charges of treason and such.
As for Soros…”nationalism”? Seriously? My, how acquitting that is of your DNC lifetime achievement status.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
It was certainly implied.
So you put in quotes. That made it a lie.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
...the combination of manpower from Eastern Europe with the technical capabilities of NATO would greatly enhance the military potential of the Partnership because it would reduce the risk of body bags for NATO countries, which is the main constraint on their willingness to act.
What part of that is "misinterpreted?" His sentiment is not subtle.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Your interpretation of his words isn't either. He is clearly talking about countries contributing force to defend non-nato countries. He is talking about a "Partnership for Peace" in Eastern Europe. Should Polish troops defend Poland or should it be US and UK troops prior to Poland entering Nato?
The NYPost claims Politifact is funded by Soros. It isn't. It was founded by the Tampa Bay Times and was purchased by the Poynter Institute. It is funded by online advertising, content partnerships and grants. I can't find any grants from Soros or any attempt by Soros to control what they have to say.
They have been characterized as having a Left-Center Bias, but report accurately.
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Politifact Left-Center Biased based on fact checks that tend to be more favorable for the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting and a credible fact-checker that is not without bias.
Politifact - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
mediabiasfactcheck.com
This page lists donors and grants.
Who Pays For PolitiFact? | PolitiFact
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.
Your source doesn't seem to have a fact to show to back them up. The claim that Soros installed DAs is bullshit. Did an organization he supports also contribute to political campaigns? Yup. Did that amount to buying votes? Nope.
I noticed you've never criticized right wing donors like the Koch brothers or Sheldon Adelson.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
...it would reduce the risk of body bags for NATO countries, which is the main constraint on their willingness to act.
LOL!
Willingness to act in defense of other countries, as in Ukraine at present?
You are truly scraping the bottom of the barrel for something to whine about.
Jack4freedom
Governor
A one sided hit piece on Soros with a super hyperbolic title by one of Rupert Murdoch’s hatchet men printed in the biggest right wing scandal rag NY Post is certainly not surprising or credible Dawg. Nobody ever heard of Soros until he helped fund Media Matters. At that time Fox News biggest headliner Billo Reilly started a media blitz against Soros which has been going on for well over a decade. Media Matters did a great job of exposing O’Reilly, Fox News and the right wing Murdoch media empire as a total bullshit mill.
Ever since then, Murdoch has hired a large team of talented fiction writers who blame, evil rich Jew Soros for all the ills of the world. Murdoch’s Hitleresque world view is well known among educated people throughout the world. Being educated, any time I see a Soros hit piece like MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN THE WORLD, (Come on) I seriously consider the scource and if it comes from a Murdoch entity, I assume it’s probably total bullshit.
It's good for debate and it's known Soros hates America
Oh well
Wingers sure love to make shit up about Soros. At least you've given up on shit like Soros being an SS officer when he was 14 or that he helped round up Jews in Hungary.
"It's known". At your house maybe. I've seen nothing that would indicate a hatred for the US. Sure as hell looks like he doesn't think much of Putin. Is that what bothers you?
Alinvegas
FJB
He's their second coming...
