New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Jan 6th BS Finally exposed

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
To actually address your question, I don't believe Trump did lose the 2020 election at least not a free and fair one.

I beleive and there is a "shit ton of evidence" to suggest that the FBI directly interferred in that election, I don't believe the elections in PA, WI, GA or AZ (who just stole another one) were legit.

And NO I won't shut the f-ck about it.
Sweet
Well...he surely did.

And he'll lose the next one. Then you can rebel and shit ...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
No, it doesn't. Got a video of him smashing something etc., great we can all stop talking about this but ya don't.....

sooo good luck.
He stood near the guys smashing that window and then took advantage of them unlocking the door to enter the building...that made him complicit in the violent entry.

As long as you want to pretend that Tucker has proven something, I will continue to point out that he hasn't.
 

BlueHeel

Council Member
Get bent. You're stupid fantasies mean absolutely zero. That Shaman whatever the hell his name is is on camera all over the goddamn place prancing around the capitol building, to which he was not invited. He was in the company of a bunch of violent anarchists, and his intention was to disrupt and menace the people working there in. Who gives a shit what you think. There's no self-righteous indignation here, there's just a simple regurgitating of facts, facts to which the very man you're discussing confessed to and now serves time for. So why don't you shut up about it. Because the very man that you're arguing in favor of has told you, by way of his confession, that he's guilty.
Sicko can't shut up about it because his tv (Tucker) is telling him what he should believe! And he swallowed his tv instructions (from Tucker) hook, line, and sinker!
Tucker reeled Sicko in, which was his job! The tv won!
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Sicko can't shut up about it because his tv (Tucker) is telling him what he should believe! And he swallowed his tv instructions (from Tucker) hook, line, and sinker!
Tucker reeled Sicko in, which was his job! The tv won!
simple minds get sucked in every time..
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
To actually address your question, I don't believe Trump did lose the 2020 election at least not a free and fair one.

I beleive and there is a "shit ton of evidence" to suggest that the FBI directly interferred in that election, I don't believe the elections in PA, WI, GA or AZ (who just stole another one) were legit.

And NO I won't shut the f-ck about it.
1. Your evidence is that the FBI was advising Twitter about potential Russian disinfo using fake accounts. They did that in 2016, so being on the lookout for it in 2020 simply made sense.
2. You argue that when an FBI guy met with Baker they must have discussed the laptop...but have no evidence of that.
3. What you show is that the FBI warned about the potential for disinformation and fake accounts and that naturally resulted in Twitter thinking the laptop met that description of Russian disinfo. You think that amounts to interference that changed the election...and your evidence is an opt in online survey by Brent Bozell....
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
To actually address your question, I don't believe Trump did lose the 2020 election at least not a free and fair one.

I beleive and there is a "shit ton of evidence" to suggest that the FBI directly interferred in that election, I don't believe the elections in PA, WI, GA or AZ (who just stole another one) were legit.

And NO I won't shut the f-ck about it.
It’s obviously pointless trying to discuss facts with this one. He’s a true fan of the Trump/Fox gaslighting.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
It’s obviously pointless trying to discuss facts with this one. He’s a true fan of the Trump/Fox gaslighting.
Since he had transitioned from spouting the crap from D'Souza and Gabelman to the laptop and Twitter bullshit, I thought we were making progress. Now I think he was hoping that we'd forget that he'd been crushed in every thread claiming there was any sort of fact in the stuff pushed by Lindell, Powell, Giuliani, Lott or D'Souza.

He ignores the findings of judges in the court cases brought by Trump lawyers as the result of corrupt judges...and refuses to read the judges opinions in those cases. He simply slanders Barr, Krebs and others who actually worked for Trump, but told Trump he lost,,,cuz they aren't loyal republicans.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Since he had transitioned from spouting the crap from D'Souza and Gabelman to the laptop and Twitter bullshit, I thought we were making progress. Now I think he was hoping that we'd forget that he'd been crushed in every thread claiming there was any sort of fact in the stuff pushed by Lindell, Powell, Giuliani, Lott or D'Souza.

He ignores the findings of judges in the court cases brought by Trump lawyers as the result of corrupt judges...and refuses to read the judges opinions in those cases. He simply slanders Barr, Krebs and others who actually worked for Trump, but told Trump he lost,,,cuz they aren't loyal republicans.
There is no progress to be made with a diehard Trump cultist. They are completely uninterested in facts and reality. They absorb pro-Trump lies and propaganda as normal people absorb oxygen. As this thread proves once again.
 
Sweet
Well...he surely did.

And he'll lose the next one. Then you can rebel and shit ...
He will "lose" all of them and should NOT be the nominee....

Didn't vote for him in 2016, voted for him in 2020 because of how corrupt the Democrat party is.

I don't like the guy, I never have, you don't have to like him to hate what they did to him.

Then you can rebel and shit
Thank you for the permission it means a lot :rolleyes:

If by some miracle a Republican is elected to the White House in 2024 you can fully expect Washington to be burnt to the ground.
 
Since he had transitioned from spouting the crap from D'Souza and Gabelman to the laptop and Twitter bullshit, I thought we were making progress. Now I think he was hoping that we'd forget that he'd been crushed in every thread claiming there was any sort of fact in the stuff pushed by Lindell, Powell, Giuliani, Lott or D'Souza.

He ignores the findings of judges in the court cases brought by Trump lawyers as the result of corrupt judges...and refuses to read the judges opinions in those cases. He simply slanders Barr, Krebs and others who actually worked for Trump, but told Trump he lost,,,cuz they aren't loyal republicans.
The suppression of the Hunter Laptop story is a FACT and it is now documented.
 
Since he had transitioned from spouting the crap from D'Souza and Gabelman to the laptop and Twitter bullshit, I thought we were making progress. Now I think he was hoping that we'd forget that he'd been crushed in every thread claiming there was any sort of fact in the stuff pushed by Lindell, Powell, Giuliani, Lott or D'Souza.

He ignores the findings of judges in the court cases brought by Trump lawyers as the result of corrupt judges...and refuses to read the judges opinions in those cases. He simply slanders Barr, Krebs and others who actually worked for Trump, but told Trump he lost,,,cuz they aren't loyal republicans.
By the way, I have never written about Powell or lindell, every time the election being stolen comes up that is you, knee jerk reaction to start shouting about the "My Pillow Guy" as if you have a point. Ya don't....

Please show me where I 'Slandered" Bill Barr or Krebs.

I have mentioned D'Souza only to point out how f-cking ridiculous it is that you (and you alone :rolleyes:) debunked all the data they collected with "foot traffic"..... thank god for you.....OK.....will never think about that again.... brillaint....

Soooo lie more below.....make your boy Liz proud.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
He will "lose" all of them and should NOT be the nominee....

Didn't vote for him in 2016, voted for him in 2020 because of how corrupt the Democrat party is.

I don't like the guy, I never have, you don't have to like him to hate what they did to him.

Then you can rebel and shit
Thank you for the permission it means a lot :rolleyes:

If by some miracle a Republican is elected to the White House in 2024 you can fully expect Washington to be burnt to the ground.
Um...things are so messed up..it will burn regardless of circumstances

That's the era he, the podunks, and the degeneracy on the left and right have ushered in
 
1. Your evidence is that the FBI was advising Twitter about potential Russian disinfo using fake accounts. They did that in 2016, so being on the lookout for it in 2020 simply made sense.
2. You argue that when an FBI guy met with Baker they must have discussed the laptop...but have no evidence of that.
3. What you show is that the FBI warned about the potential for disinformation and fake accounts and that naturally resulted in Twitter thinking the laptop met that description of Russian disinfo. You think that amounts to interference that changed the election...and your evidence is an opt in online survey by Brent Bozell....
You need new talking points.

We have learned a lot since 2016, like Brennan suppressing evidence that the Russians did just as much to promote Clinton and more importantly we learned that the "Russian Bots" never amounted to anything. Of course groups like Hamilton 68 used "russian bots" as an excuse to shut down people they did not like. Hamilton 68 of course now has been utterly disgraced and rightly so.

As for your nonsense and repeated denials on the lap top: It would only make sense to someone who denies the fact that they knew a story about Hunter Biden was coming. A story the FBI knew along with DHS and the other intelligence agencies was NOT a Russian Hack and Leak operation.

Of course we know they lied, leaned on Twitter and Facebook to shut the story down, your denials are not going to change that.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You need new talking points.

We have learned a lot since 2016, like Brennan suppressing evidence that the Russians did just as much to promote Clinton and more importantly we learned that the "Russian Bots" never amounted to anything. Of course groups like Hamilton 68 used "russian bots" as an excuse to shut down people they did not like. Hamilton 68 of course now has been utterly disgraced and rightly so.

As for your nonsense and repeated denials on the lap top: It would only make sense to someone who denies the fact that they knew a story about Hunter Biden was coming. A story the FBI knew along with DHS and the other intelligence agencies was NOT a Russian Hack and Leak operation.

Of course we know they lied, leaned on Twitter and Facebook to shut the story down, your denials are not going to change that.
I posted a link to testimony about how many accounts the Russians created and how many were posting in favor of Trump and how many in favor of Clinton. The numbers weren't close. I have repeatedly asked you to provide a link to back up your accusation that there were just as many for Clinton...and you've failed to find that info.

Who the hell is Hamilton 68 and what power did they have? Did they call a mob to DC to keep Trump from staying in power? Did you know it was shut down in 2018?


You need some facts.

Nobody has claimed the Russian interference in 2016 changed a vote. That doesn't mean they did not break the law in the attempt.

You continue to argue that the FBI kept the laptop story from being spread around. That is a lie. I read it on the NYPost website. It was all over the place for anyone who cared to read it. There is not a single bit of evidence of corruption by Joe Biden and the investigation is being run by a republican appointed by Trump.

The FBI didn't say the laptop was a hack and leak from Russia. That was Twitter interpreting warnings about the potential as applying to the laptop. Twitter banned the story for 24 hours....that means people on Twitter could quote it, link to it, talk about it...
and it doesn't matter that the NYPost account was blocked. Did the Twitter files mention the FBI telling Twitter to block NYPost? No.

Once again...quote the NYPost article where it shows Joe did something that would have changed votes.
 
I posted a link to testimony about how many accounts the Russians created and how many were posting in favor of Trump and how many in favor of Clinton. The numbers weren't close. I have repeatedly asked you to provide a link to back up your accusation that there were just as many for Clinton...and you've failed to find that info.

Who the hell is Hamilton 68 and what power did they have? Did they call a mob to DC to keep Trump from staying in power? Did you know it was shut down in 2018?


You need some facts.

Nobody has claimed the Russian interference in 2016 changed a vote. That doesn't mean they did not break the law in the attempt.

You continue to argue that the FBI kept the laptop story from being spread around. That is a lie. I read it on the NYPost website. It was all over the place for anyone who cared to read it. There is not a single bit of evidence of corruption by Joe Biden and the investigation is being run by a republican appointed by Trump.

The FBI didn't say the laptop was a hack and leak from Russia. That was Twitter interpreting warnings about the potential as applying to the laptop. Twitter banned the story for 24 hours....that means people on Twitter could quote it, link to it, talk about it...
and it doesn't matter that the NYPost account was blocked. Did the Twitter files mention the FBI telling Twitter to block NYPost? No.

Once again...quote the NYPost article where it shows Joe did something that would have changed votes.
You have been give the link and ignored it repeatedly.


You continue to lie about what happened with FBI and Twitter, you claim to have read the Twitter Files, if you have actually read them you have ignored the content provided which is based on the communications of Twitter and the Federal Gov't.

The FBI killed the investigation into the Laptop, they leaned on Social Media companies to do the same, the whole time knowing it was NOT a Russian Hack and Leak operation. At the FBI's direction certain number of users could not link to the NY Post story, could not share the link even in DM's, and of course we know the NY Post was banned for a full two weeks. Our Federal Gov't also did this for anthing they did not like concerning COVID 19 from vaccines to where the virus came from.

As for the Russian bots, your link/information is outdated. There was not shit to those Russian bots and the claim that YOUR party ran with after 2016 and the MSM ran with REPEATEDLY was that Putin put Trump in office, an absolute lie your party is still defending.

Your party is hopelessly corrupt as is much of our Gov't and your defense of that corruption is appalling.
 
Top