New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Woke?

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
There was going to be a surge eventually. By keeping transmission down places with mask mandates postponed the surge, spread it out over more time, and lowered the peak.
So masks work for a while and then stop working? LOL!
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. There is nothing showing Joe Biden did anything corrupt or criminal...
2. Why commit a crime to cover up nothing at all?
1. Sure there is - they were "obviously" selling influence.
2. Why create a false impression that it was "Russian disinformation" if it was "nothing at all?"
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member

middleview

President
Supporting Member
1. Sure there is - they were "obviously" selling influence.
2. Why create a false impression that it was "Russian disinformation" if it was "nothing at all?"
1. Be specific...what evidence ya got?
2. Because it looked and smelled like it...so what crimes are documented on the laptop?
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. Be specific...what evidence ya got?
2. Because it looked and smelled like it...so what crimes are documented on the laptop?
Hunter, a drug and sex addicted f*ck up being paid millions for...what, exactly?
We need a special prosecutor to look into it - where there is smoke there is fire.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Hunter, a drug and sex addicted f*ck up being paid millions for...what, exactly?
We need a special prosecutor to look into it - where there is smoke there is fire.
So you think because Hunter was being paid by Burisma there should be an investigation?

Should there also be an investigation into the Trump family? What was Donald doing to earn $3 million per year from Turkey?

 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Hunter, a drug and sex addicted f*ck up being paid millions for...what, exactly?
We need a special prosecutor to look into it - where there is smoke there is fire.
Be specific...what evidence ya got?

Your answer is "I don't have any, but just because he made money it should be investigated"....

So anyone making money from foreign companies or nations should be investigated, just in case there is a crime involved? Manafort, Flynn, Don Jr., Donald?
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
So you think because Hunter was being paid by Burisma there should be an investigation?

Should there also be an investigation into the Trump family? What was Donald doing to earn $3 million per year from Turkey?

No I think there should be an investigation because he was being paid millions despite having zero qualifications.

Put his name on a building.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Be specific...what evidence ya got?

Your answer is "I don't have any, but just because he made money it should be investigated"....

So anyone making money from foreign companies or nations should be investigated, just in case there is a crime involved? Manafort, Flynn, Don Jr., Donald?
No, people related to powerful politicians being paid tens of millions despite having absolutely zero qualifications, skills or knowledge should be investigated...duh!
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
No I think there should be an investigation because he was being paid millions despite having zero qualifications.

Put his name on a building.
What qualifications do the Trump kids have? What was Ivanka doing at the G20? Why did she get fast track on copyrights in China?

Flynn, Manafort, Giuliani....shesh...talk about a bucket of worms....you want to investigate anyone getting paid despite zero qualifications?
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
What qualifications do the Trump kids have? What was Ivanka doing at the G20? Why did she get fast track on copyrights in China?

Flynn, Manafort, Giuliani....shesh...talk about a bucket of worms....you want to investigate anyone getting paid despite zero qualifications?
Unlike you, I think they should BOTH be investigated. Yeah, any "obvious" influence peddling situation should be investigated. Not sure why you are defending official corruption here...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Unlike you, I think they should BOTH be investigated. Yeah, any "obvious" influence peddling situation should be investigated. Not sure why you are defending official corruption here...
I'm asking for evidence of a crime. You have none. Opening up investigations on the idea that maybe there is wrong doing is simply bizarre. You objected to the Jan 6 hearings, when the crimes were obvious and finding the organizers and funders was the motivation.

You say there is evidence of official corruption. No there isn't,
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
I'm asking for evidence of a crime. You have none. Opening up investigations on the idea that maybe there is wrong doing is simply bizarre. You objected to the Jan 6 hearings, when the crimes were obvious and finding the organizers and funders was the motivation.

You say there is evidence of official corruption. No there isn't,
Did they find those "organizers and funders?" There is the appearance of impropriety - I think every time there is it should be investigated. You think only Republicans should be investigated (obviously).
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
LOL! Where did I say or even suggest that? There you go again, chasing those straw men...

Sure there is - the FBI/Intelligence Community running Biden interference over Hunter's laptop is criminal behavior that should justify a revote. I'd be willing to take the results of that as the last word, how about you?

I don't see "overturn" in there anywhere, do you? Gosh, how do you keep your army of straw men fed?
What crime do you think is in evidence related to either the contents of the laptop or the actions of the FBI?

I'm willing to accept the results of the 2020 election in the absence of any evidence of significant fraud or interference.

The laptop isn't enough. Taibbi said he found no evidence that the FBI told Twitter to censor the laptop story. The NYPost implies evidence of corruption, but it isn't in their story....all they have is that one of the 5 partners suggested setting aside 10% of Bohai Harvest for Joe Biden....which didn't happen. The proof is the articles of incorporation. Add to that Joe was a private citizen in 2017 and could have joined the company...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Did they find those "organizers and funders?" There is the appearance of impropriety - I think every time there is it should be investigated. You think only Republicans should be investigated (obviously).
Yes they did. That is why they sent a referral to the DOJ to charge Trump.
His campaign paid millions out to the organizers of the rally. They contacted Proud Boys, OathKeepers, Three Percenters to come and in some cases paid for their transportation.

I think the evidence of a crime should be investigated. What crime is evident in anything Hunter or Joe did related to Joe's job as VP or in the Senate?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Did they find those "organizers and funders?" There is the appearance of impropriety - I think every time there is it should be investigated. You think only Republicans should be investigated (obviously).
Contact your congressman...see if you can schedule an investigation into this...


Even though you say you think impropriety should be investigated....you never seem to call for investigations into republicans.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
LOL! Where did I say or even suggest that? There you go again, chasing those straw men...

Sure there is - the FBI/Intelligence Community running Biden interference over Hunter's laptop is criminal behavior that should justify a revote. I'd be willing to take the results of that as the last word, how about you?

I don't see "overturn" in there anywhere, do you? Gosh, how do you keep your army of straw men fed?
Pence said he did not have the constitutional authority to reject electors. You then posted this.

Pence is a complete hack, so I'd discount anything he had to say, even if he wasn't in a position to potentally benefit from burying Trump.
 

write on

Senator
Pence said he did not have the constitutional authority to reject electors. You then posted this.

Pence is a complete hack, so I'd discount anything he had to say, even if he wasn't in a position to potentally benefit from burying Trump.
o_O

We're in a alternate universe.


;)
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
The White House that approved the memo, including Eastman, Clark, and Trump.
When you read the memo and then think about what the plan would be if Pence didn't toss electors from the battleground states....and think about Trump watching Fox News coverage of the riot for 3 hours and not sending help...

The plan was obviously to disrupt the count of electors, one way or another.
 
Top