New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Former federal prosecutor Francey Hakes accused Bragg of weaponizing the law politically, and acting like a "king," in order to indict the former pres

MaryAnne

Governor
I'm not concderned with the number. The point is the ASC invalidated the count, as being fraudulent, from mismatched signatures, and kept the apppeal alive, by sending it back to the lower court, showing that they arent going to just sit back and let some Democrat election supervisor ramrod fraudulent ballots through, without being called out on it.

Now admit that they did invalidate those results.... links in post # 164.
You are not concerned about the number, then get this, “ Trump, First Ex POTUS, ever indicted!” How about that?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Case should be tossed on Statute of Limitations grounds.
2) Ludicrous witness - 3) hush money campaign activity is a joke. 4) prosecutorial misconduct 5) add your own :D
Hush money ! Sounds more like blackmail.

Trump's mug shot will put him back in the White House - most popular T-shirt in America.
How can you know what the statute of limitations is without knowing the charges?

Taking money from the campaign and using it for personal expenses is illegal. Filing false paperwork with the FEC is also a crime.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
They did. If they had validated the results, they would not have sent it back down to the lower courts. That is how supreme courts invalidate things. Duh!

2 links not enough ? need 10 ? 20 ? :rolleyes:
Had they invalidated the results, as you claim, there would be no reason for further consideration by the lower court.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
There it is >> the proof that you never read the evidences I posted. You flunked this easy QUIZ with a flat ZERO, and you know nothing about all the fraud evidences that I posted, which you laughably claim to have refuted.

Note: you must READ, before you can REFUTE.
So you did not memorize the name of the judge in PA who read the evidence and threw Trump's case out.

I did not memorize the names of individuals you included in your posts. Instead I focused on what they said and provided facts that flushed those claims down the shitter.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
I saw nothing about anyone named Brann in this thread.

There are 7 first names in the Post #160 list. Melissa is not one of them.
"In this thread"? I posted more than once about judges who tossed Trump lawsuits. You replied that the judges never considered the evidence. I provided a link and a quote from Brann to the evidence the Trump lawyers cited in filing the case.

Melissa was one who testified as to election fraud she "witnessed".
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
There is another case they have, too. A Playgirl who had an affair with him.

The thing is, this is only one of numerous cases against Trump. Interfering in an election, keeping and hiding secret documents

Trump will never be elected again. Joe Biden beat him by 7 million votes and over 300 electoral votes.
I thought it was 8 million
 

protectionist

Governor
So you did not memorize the name of the judge in PA who read the evidence and threw Trump's case out.

I did not memorize the names of individuals you included in your posts. Instead I focused on what they said and provided facts that flushed those claims down the shitter.
No, you said not a word about what
1. Alexandra
2. Zachary
3. Jesse
4. Robert
5. Steven
6. Phill
7. Russell
all said. Not one word. You don't know what they said, or what their connections were to 2020 election fraud, and you are a QUIZ ZERO here, just like all the others, except you pretend to know, wheras they just go quiet.
 

protectionist

Governor
Had they invalidated the results, as you claim, there would be no reason for further consideration by the lower court.
Their invalidation of the results, IS THE REASON for further consideration by the lower court. Had the resukts been validated, they would not have been REJECTED, and sent back.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
No, you said not a word about what
1. Alexandra
2. Zachary
3. Jesse
4. Robert
5. Steven
6. Phill
7. Russell
all said. Not one word. You don't know what they said, or what their connections were to 2020 election fraud, and you are a QUIZ ZERO here, just like all the others, except you pretend to know, wheras they just go quiet.
Because I did not memorize the names in your posted links...
 

protectionist

Governor
Because I did not memorize the names in your posted links...
You dont HAVE TO "memorize". All you have to do is go to the posts and READ them, but you never did that. You could go there right now, and come back with the answers within the hour. Like all the other leftists you're afraid to go to those posts, fearing/knowing that they will burst your fraud denial bubbles.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You dont HAVE TO "memorize". All you have to do is go to the posts and READ them, but you never did that. You could go there right now, and come back with the answers within the hour. Like all the other leftists you're afraid to go to those posts, fearing/knowing that they will burst your fraud denial bubbles.
What thread are you saying went unchallenged?

I focused on the accusations...not the people's names.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You dont HAVE TO "memorize". All you have to do is go to the posts and READ them, but you never did that. You could go there right now, and come back with the answers within the hour. Like all the other leftists you're afraid to go to those posts, fearing/knowing that they will burst your fraud denial bubbles.
I noticed that you could not identify the names that were mentioned in my replies to you related to judges comments about Trump lawsuits, nor could you remember the name of a woman who had testified to republicans about voter fraud.

Link to the thread that you think I didn't read your "evidence" in.



 
Last edited:

protectionist

Governor
What thread are you saying went unchallenged?

I focused on the accusations...not the people's names.
But if you had read the posts, loaded with 2020 fraud evidences, you would know the names of the people cited in these posts. You never even looked at them, and than go around claiming you did, and that there isnt any evidence, when it would take you a WEEK to read all of it (including the links & sublinks)

What thread! I've only posted them a dozens times or more.
See Posts 383....384....386.....387.......388


Accusations ? OK we can do that. What were the accusations of Derrick Van Orden, William Feehan, Dr. William Briggs, Dr. Eric Coomer, Russ Ramsland, Harri Hursti, ?
Or will this just bring about more DODGES ?
 
Last edited:

protectionist

Governor
I noticed that you could not identify the names that were mentioned in my replies to you related to judges comments about Trump lawsuits, nor could you remember the name of a woman who had testified to republicans about voter fraud.

Link to the thread that you think I didn't read your "evidence" in.



HA! look who's talking about "could not identify the names that were mentioned" - Sheeeesh! :rolleyes:
 
Top