As I pointed out, unless they put their motives down on paper, there was zero possibility of indicting any of the bureaucrats for a crime. So, while there was a lack of evidence of a crime, the evidence is overwhelming that they acted shamefully. But according to you, it's "medals for everyone." Because you are a hack.
Just as I said about the conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign. Unless you get someone on the inside of the conspiracy to flip...proving it is impossible.
Now...your side argues that there should not have been an investigation into the Russian interference in the election. Crossfire should not have happened at all. The FBI should have just said...well, we have no solid evidence of collusion, so let's just drop it.
Now we have no evidence of a crime or a conspiracy within the FBI to create some anti-Trump investigation, but Trump went ahead with appointing Durham to create one.
You admit a lack of evidence of a crime, but insist they acted shamefully. Based on what evidence?
We knew of a crime in hacking the DNC. We saw DNC Email being delivered to Wikileaks and published. There was good reason to investigate the crime and anyone who stood to gain. Given the large number of contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign folks...it absolutely made sense to suspect the Trump campaign.
You call me a hack because you have little to go on to dispute the facts. You think, somehow discrediting other posters helps your argument. It doesn't. In my opinion, your slavish devotion to the MAGA cause indicates who the hack is.