New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Comer/Jordan Investigation Turns Into a Farcical Circus

protectionist

Governor
Sadly for everyone, that is just the tip of a very large ice berg when it comes to how corrupt the Democrat Party is, and the Administrative State that runs our Government.
Absolutely.With 2016, we're talking about crimes committed by at least a DOZEN different people. But we have to start somewhere, and no better place to start with than Hillary Clinton.
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
Absolutely.With 2016, we're talking about crimes committed by at least a DOZEN different people. But we have to start somewhere, and no better place to start with than Hillary Clinton.
Heck yeah champ. You guys should start right there and dig like the dickens with all your might. Maybe by 2035 you’se guys might actually come up with an indictment. She is a very bad person. If you are lucky enough to get another Trumpy type President he may even be able to appoint Durham as AG. I really admire your pluck and grit. You go girls!!!
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
Democrats think they can wipe away a mountain of crimes, just by saying so. :rolleyes:
Drat, those Democrats are really fiendish and cunning. But they are no match for you protectionist or your little sidekick Sicky. Between the two of you, I am sure you will crack this caper lickety splits. Please keep us all posted regarding your investigation. Cheers
 

bdtex

Administrator
Staff member
Another great response from our resident right wing expert on all things political. You should start an informative podcast or better yet, become a TV analyst like Tucker or Sean.
They can't help it. They've got nothing just like Comer/Jordan. It was a farce from the beginning.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Democrats think they can wipe away a mountain of crimes, just by saying so. :rolleyes:
Sadly....Republicans dismiss the crimes Trump has committed by blaming judges, prosecutors, the FBI...and think they can distract from his numerous lawsuits in court, his two impeachment, his pending indictments..by inventing crimes to throw at Biden
 

protectionist

Governor
Heck yeah champ. You guys should start right there and dig like the dickens with all your might. Maybe by 2035 you’se guys might actually come up with an indictment. She is a very bad person. If you are lucky enough to get another Trumpy type President he may even be able to appoint Durham as AG. I really admire your pluck and grit. You go girls!!!
So what's YOUR assessment of all the disgusting crimes noted in Post # 118. You think they're OK ?
 

protectionist

Governor
Drat, those Democrats are really fiendish and cunning. But they are no match for you protectionist or your little sidekick Sicky. Between the two of you, I am sure you will crack this caper lickety splits. Please keep us all posted regarding your investigation. Cheers
We're not investigating anything. There have already been 2 long and thorough investigations (Mueller & Durham), and they both concluded the Democrats fiendishly colluded with Russians, and then tried to pin their wrongdoings on Trump.
 

protectionist

Governor
Sadly....Republicans dismiss the crimes Trump has committed by blaming judges, prosecutors, the FBI...and think they can distract from his numerous lawsuits in court, his two impeachment, his pending indictments..by inventing crimes to throw at Biden
Lawsuits ? Anybody can file a lawsuit. Doesnt mean anybody did anything wrong.
Two impeachments / HA HA HA. By whom ? A bunch of scatterbrained Democrats yelling "orange man bad"
Pending indictment ? More political theater designed to deril Trum['s 2024 candidacy.

Maybe these TDSers don't think tht the GOP has other good candidates, and if Trump doesnt run, any one of those other candidates could trounce whoever the Democrats manage to come up with to replace lost cause Biden. They're wrong. GOP has a great bench, unlike the Democrats, who don't.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
We're not investigating anything. There have already been 2 long and thorough investigations (Mueller & Durham), and they both concluded the Democrats fiendishly colluded with Russians, and then tried to pin their wrongdoings on Trump.
Durham gave you his opinion...but convictions...1, for deleting a line from an email.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Lawsuits ? Anybody can file a lawsuit. Doesnt mean anybody did anything wrong.
Two impeachments / HA HA HA. By whom ? A bunch of scatterbrained Democrats yelling "orange man bad"
Pending indictment ? More political theater designed to deril Trum['s 2024 candidacy.

Maybe these TDSers don't think tht the GOP has other good candidates, and if Trump doesnt run, any one of those other candidates could trounce whoever the Democrats manage to come up with to replace lost cause Biden. They're wrong. GOP has a great bench, unlike the Democrats, who don't.
Tax fraud? Trump Inc lost that one. Defamation? Trump lost that one. $5 mil to his victim.
He just got fined $1 mil for the frivolous lawsuit he filed against Hillary. He's now on trial for 34 counts of fraud. He's about to be indicted for the stolen documents found at Mag-A-Lardo.


And then we have the Jan 6 riot...

Good luck skooter.
 
Last edited:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
First of all the Durham report offers LOTS of evidence of crimes (US Code 18, Section 793 for starters), and even if it didn't, it shows misbehavior which no people in any country should accept or tolerate fom their political "leaders".

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information.

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;

That would be Donald Trump. He even admitted that he was entitled to take the top secret documents and keep them.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Democrats think they can wipe away a mountain of crimes, just by saying so. :rolleyes:
You did a c*p of a bunch of bullshit accusations without a single link to prove it.

1. Did she use an illegal email server? No. Did she share classified documents? No. Did some people send email to her that was marked classified? Yes.
2. Did she lie about the server? No.
3. Did she support a member of the Muslim brotherhood for president of Egypt? Who was that? Got a link proving this?
4. Hillary defended an accused child rapist. She was appointed by the judge. She asked to be removed and the request was denied. The accused was found guilty and went to jail. She laughed at how inept the prosecution was.

Clinton: Of course he claimed he didn’t. All this stuff. He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs. [laughs]

Clinton's 1975 Rape Case - FactCheck.org

5. Hillary did not deny a request for additional security. She had no say in the deployment of military force. She did order reinforcements to be sent from Tripoli. One of them was killed by mortar fire at the CIA annex.

6. Al Qaeda did not attack the consulate. A Libyan militia did that. Ansar al-Sharia was responsible. There were 6 republican investigations and did not find that anyone in the administration acted improperly.
2012 Benghazi attack - Wikipedia

7. She was joking about a drone attack on Assange. Was Trump serious about attacking Mexico to kill drug gangs? How about using a nuclear weapon on a hurricane?

8. Clinton approved sending weapons to jihadist groups? Got a link to that?

9. Hillary got a heads up on a pending investigation into her email? Wow...I'm sure that was illegal...what law? Would Hillary have broken the law or did the person giving her the heads up commit a crime?

10. The investigation into the Clinton Foundation went on for years. It only ended in the final days of the Trump administration. It found nothing at all.

11. Half of people Hillary met with made donations to the Clinton foundation? Bullshit.
The foundation was doing a lot of charity work around the world. Neither Hillary nor Bill were paid by the foundation.

12. The FBI is now actively investigating the Clinton Foundation? Nope.
Trump Justice Department kept Clinton Foundation case open until last days of presidency: report | The Hill

13. Really? The foundation required $100k to meet with Bill? Got a link to prove this?

14. Hillary proposed "abandoning" the 2nd amendment? Fer chrissakes....do you know anything at all about changes to the constitution? The supreme court cannot rewrite the constitution.

15. When did Hillary "praise" open borders. What law would that be a violation of, in any case?

16. So when did Hillary suggest expanding the number of Syrian refugees? Do you hate Muslims? Was Hillary in office in 2016? What law would she have broken by suggesting that, even if she did?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Absolutely.With 2016, we're talking about crimes committed by at least a DOZEN different people. But we have to start somewhere, and no better place to start with than Hillary Clinton.
Name the dozen people who committed crimes. Flynn, Manafort, Carter Page, Kilimnick, Roger Stone, Rick Gates, Cohen, Papadopoulos and about 12 Russian military officers who were part of the hack of the DNC...

Mueller Investigation: All of the Guilty Pleas, Indictments | Time
 
Top