Spamature
President
The subjects of this thread.
There is 1 him and 1 her.
What Was Wrong With Kim Potter Shooting Daunte Wright ?
- Thread starter protectionist
- Start date
There is 1 him and 1 her.
Spamature
President
I am only talking about the cop and the victim.
EatTheRich
President
5 murders.
protectionist
Governor
He fought with a cop, and tried to grab his gun. Felony in every state in America.
protectionist
Governor
But other names have ALSO been mentioned in the thread (ex Michael Slager and Walter Scott. Don't be lazy.
protectionist
Governor
He was not a "victim". He was a criminal, who created his own demise. Justifiable homicide.
Spamature
President
Spamature
President
There was an offender and that offender's victim, and a trial.
A trail at which the offender was convicted of killing the victim.
protectionist
Governor
But they have been discussed, so unless you specify which ones you're talking about, no one has any way of knowing. We don't read minds.
protectionist
Governor
Potter committed no offense. She carried out normal and perfectly reasonable self-defense, which your liberal teachers were too clueless to ever teach you, which is why you are just as clueless now, as they were.
Wright victimized himself, but he was also vicitimized by the liberal schools that neglected to teach him police confrontation behavior.
Spamature
President
I am supposed to discuss stuff I haven't read anything about and know nothing about ?
You must think I am a right winger.
Spamature
President
protectionist
Governor
Yeah. When you post in a thread you should have read the thread - especially when it not very long.
protectionist
Governor
I understand, that to you, and other liberals having "killed someone" is not necessarily a bad thing.
Liberals have no sense of self-defense, or the concept of justifiable homicide.
If someone was about to hack you to pieces with a machete, you would just stand there and let them do it ? Or you would shoot them?
Spamature
President
This thread is 150 post long.
Unless you posted it to me in a reply, don't expect that I have read it.
I would not expect you to have read every post made to everyone else in other threads, either.
Killing someone is always a bad thing.
Killing that person at that time because of her own negligence
is a very bad thing.
Here is the problem with your argument that you have overlooked.
She meant to taser him, not kill him.
Even she didn't think he was the danger you claim he was, and even she did not think lethal force was necessary or justifiable.
Which is why she intended to use a taser instead of using her gun.
Even Kim Potter herself proves you are wrong.
protectionist
Governor
1. 150 posts is not long. Long posts are those that number over 1,000.
2. Wow! > what a clear cut revelation of liberal ignorance, stupidity, and lunacy. This just goes to show how far out in the fringe liberal thinking actually is.
EARTH TO LIBERALS: not only is killing someone not always a bad thing, in many cases, it is an exceptionally GOOD thing. Literally millions of examples exist.
UPDATED: Civilian shoots, kills man attacking deputy in Florida (leoaffairs.com)
CCW Permit Holder Shoots Accused Robber, Carjacker (ammoland.com)
It is also a good thing for a murderer to be executed. This death penalty eliminates the risk of that killer creating more murder victims, by him/her killing again. Strange how liberals can't comprehend this simple reality.
3. Potter did not intend to use a taser, she carried out normal/proper police procedure by shooting a suspect resisting arrest, hands disappearing from view, and representing a lethal threat, killing was ordinary self-defense, of which cops are cleared from all charges, all the time. I've repeatedly posted a list of named examples. HO HUM.
Last edited:
Spamature
President
Expert: Kim Potter was not justified in using deadly force
A use-of-force expert has testified that former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter was not justified in using deadly force when she fatally shot Daunte Wright
Potter, who resigned from the Brooklyn Center police force two days after she shot and killed Wright, has said she meant to pull her Taser instead of her gun
Seriously, you are now trying to call her a liar too ?
Look, there is nothing left to say here.
You've been proven wrong even by Kim Potter herself.
protectionist
Governor
No I haven't. In fact, the light sentence she got PROVES ME RIGHT. She downplayed the shooting, to reduce the charge. It worked.Expert: Kim Potter was not justified in using deadly force
A use-of-force expert has testified that former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter was not justified in using deadly force when she fatally shot Daunte Wrightabcnews.go.com
Potter, who resigned from the Brooklyn Center police force two days after she shot and killed Wright, has said she meant to pull her Taser instead of her gun
Seriously, you are now trying to call her a liar too ?
Look, there is nothing left to say here.
You've been proven wrong even by Kim Potter herself.
If she wasn't working in a blue city (where no cop should ever be), she would have said nothing about a taser, and would not even been charged (like Jeronimo Yanez and Betty Shelby)
Spamature
President
So you're calling her a liar who cheated the justice system with her lies.
No wonder you wingers support her.
You do love and worship your lying cheats.
Deplorable !
protectionist
Governor
Too HEAVILY involved in the Ukraine/Russia issue now, to deal with this anymore.
