Each post is in GoogleAnd I'm sure that there are literally tens of people reading these posts.
Each post is in GoogleAnd I'm sure that there are literally tens of people reading these posts.
every postI think Trump will be part of a lot of conversations as long as you're posting.
It's all good.
re-read that!So you just want to tell us people don't like Joe Biden?
“Trump” is not the DNC alternative to Biden, so - as always - your bogus excuse falls flat on sheer underachievement alone.There is a broader context, like "who do they want to run instead?"
It’s not “about 2024”. It is specifically about folks not wanting Biden in 2024. Stay on topic.Of course Trump is relevant in a conversation about 2024...quit whining.
What made the topic limited to DNC alternatives? It wasn't a poll limited to democrats.“Trump” is not the DNC alternative to Biden, so - as always - your bogus excuse falls flat on sheer underachievement alone.
Just stay on topic.
The thing about democracy is popularity is always relative.“Trump” is not the DNC alternative to Biden, so - as always - your bogus excuse falls flat on sheer underachievement alone.
Just stay on topic.
Right, it's was a poll of Americans, not just democrats.What made the topic limited to DNC alternatives? It wasn't a poll limited to democrats.
Why do you need to CHANGE THE SUBJECT to “alternatives to Joe Biden” rather than discussion of the fact that 7/10 Americans don’t want Biden to run again? What is it that compels you to dilute and detract from the subject? Is there payment involved? Do you hold some official station or job scope that requires this? Can Joe Biden EVER be discussed without direct Trumpjacking?What made the topic limited to DNC alternatives? It wasn't a poll limited to democrats.
So it's the poll equivalent of Yi Jianlian.Why do you need to CHANGE THE SUBJECT to “alternatives to Joe Biden” rather than discussion of the fact that 7/10 Americans don’t want Biden to run again? What is it that compels you to dilute and detract from the subject? Is there payment involved? Do you hold some official station or job scope that requires this? Can Joe Biden EVER be discussed without direct Trumpjacking?
The subject has nothing at all to do with potential 2024 candidates, potential 2024 alternatives to Biden, or “Trump”. Yet over and over again you remain insistent that you simply MUST write about “Trump” here and elsewhere.
Sheldon Whitehouse, Andrew Yang, Corey Booker, Tim Ryan, …….Ben Sasse, Lis Cheney, John Kasich, …….Any decent Republican without the stench of Trump on him or her.Who? Kamala? AOC?
That’s it? 70% want the eligible incumbent GONE…and that’s what you come up with? Ok.So it's the poll equivalent of Yi Jianlian.
Yi was a tremendous player against empty chairs. But when faced with actual competition he didn't hold up.
Some Democrats aren't thrilled by the idea of Joe representing their party in 2024:This is why I hope he runs again. Even Kamala. Her turn you know. ha ha
Who? Kamala? AOC?
I'm with Jack some, thinking Cheney would be best.Sheldon Whitehouse, Andrew Yang, Corey Booker, Tim Ryan, …….Ben Sasse, Lis Cheney, John Kasich, …….Any decent Republican without the stench of Trump on him or her.
Yang, Booker, and Ryan already lost to Biden.Sheldon Whitehouse, Andrew Yang, Corey Booker, Tim Ryan, …….Ben Sasse, Lis Cheney, John Kasich, …….Any decent Republican without the stench of Trump on him or her.
The poll is not how the system works.That’s it? 70% want the eligible incumbent GONE…and that’s what you come up with? Ok.
Perhaps not. Though a sack of doorknobs would be better.The poll is not how the system works.
They might not want him to run again, but they can't agree on anyone better.
We know Biden can beat Trump, so that's worth a few extra doorknobs.Perhaps not. Though a sack of doorknobs would be better.
Ok. A sack and a half.We know Biden can beat Trump, so that's worth a few extra doorknobs.
So what…..Different timesYang, Booker, and Ryan already lost to Biden.
Kasich already lost to Trump.