Well, you keep arguing that teachers have little to do with the quality of teaching in the classroom.
Nope. I never said that. As far as the quality of teaching in the classroom, the PARENTS have an equal share in the preparation. If they do not discipline their little monsters and if the school district does not do something about the little bastards who disrupt class on a daily basis (AND I'VE SEEN THIS QUITE A BIT), the greatest teachers in the world cannot do their jobs.
When we already are getting a terrible product for top end prices, why would we pay them more when they have so little to do with it?
Oh, it's FAR from top end prices, if you track the history of teacher pay and what it used to be able to buy. Long before the welfare state began taking such a bite out of federal, state and local budgets, teachers often could buy and pay for homes in a relatively short period of time.
What I'm saying is, if a teacher is required to take on more and more tasks then a corresponding raise in pay should accompany that increase in tasks. (Yes, the teaching profession is FAR more than just standing in front of the class, lecturing, giving tests and grading papers.) The school gets more money when it crams more students into the classroom. The teacher (who is the ONLY person who has to work harder because of that) is also the ONLY person who does not get extra money for more brats in the classroom.
According to you, if we spend more money, it should be on better textbooks.
What I'm about to say will probably piss off a few conservatives here. (What else is new? I pretty much piss off everybody here for one reason or another.) In my experience, each school is almost a separate country when it comes to the style in which it presents the education. The books differ, school to school. In the same county in Florida (where the news has attempted to say our new governor has gotten rid of Common Core) I still see some Common Core textbooks here and there. Comparing them to other books, I don't see that much of a difference, (except for the Chinese Fire Drill known as Common Core Math.)
There are different reasons to spend money at different schools. Some high schools have gym equipment that is falling apart. Some middle schools (and three weeks ago I subbed at one) don't have enough rooms for the massive influx of students coming in. These schools likewise do not have enough teachers.
I'm NOT saying that you need to give all teachers a raise and somehow EVERY kid in school will be so well educated that he/she will get a scholarship from Harvard. All I'm saying is, if you demand more from a teacher, PAY FOR IT, same as you would any other commodity.
And don't say that isn't what you said, it is. You really need a more consistent story than teachers aren't responsible for anything bad happening, but start by paying them more. That makes no sense.
Oh, I NEVER said teachers aren't responsible for anything bad happen. I NEVER put out such an absolute statement. There are some teachers (and I've seen them) who are incompetent, like in any other line of work. There are some teachers who let fights get started and not stop them. I subbed for one teacher who was suspended for punching another student. So NO, I've never claimed that ALL teachers are perfect. And I'm not right now suggesting a blanket raise for all teachers just to be throwing money at the problem. (Which Congress does on a daily basis, anyway.)
I'm not even suggesting pay teachers more so they can afford more stuff, better houses, better cars, vacations. I don't subscribe to that entitlement bullshit, and you know it.
What I'm saying is, if you ask more of a teacher then PAY FOR IT.
If the person in the classroom with the kids isn't the problem, then they aren't the solution either.
The teacher in the classroom does not have 100 percent control over those animals. The teacher didn't raise them. The teacher only gets 25-35 young skulls full of mush in front of her/him. The teacher has a task to fulfill. If a few of those animals get rowdy and disrupt the class because their parents are [Unwelcome language removed] idiots who don't know how to raise kids, and if the school district will not allow that teacher to properly punish and discipline those brats, you're going to have the results you have. The teacher has no say in it. And if a few bad apples prevent the rest of the class from getting the public school education that property owners are paying, that's not the teacher's fault.
And I find that totally dubious as well. How can a good teacher not teach even with a mediocre text book? My areas are business/finance and IT. I could totally teach people a ton even using a mediocre textbook. I'd use it for what it's worth and give them additional reading/research and papers based on other sources.
Most of the teachers I sub for, (those who I'm able to talk to) have zero complaints about the textbooks. They are able to create lesson plans based on the books and on what the state and federal government requires. The textbooks aren't the problem.
And I don't know WHY you keep changing the subject and putting words in my mouth. I NEVER said all teachers deserve a raise and will automatically start producing geniuses from their classrooms.
ALL I said was, if you add more and more tasks to a teacher's agenda, PAY FOR IT, just like a fcking McDonalds would do with its dumbest burger flippers. That's ALL I'm saying. PAY for what you get.