A poster wants a rule change

[PNWest]

So you think you're Special
ain't that special
You don't run nothing but your fingers
and now crying others did what you do!

You mad @Dawg?

You don't like me pointing out the "separate but equal" treatment of conservatives and libbies here?

 

[Dawg]

I don't really Care. Do you? HAHAHAHAHAHA

View attachment 69696

So stop crying

 

[PhilFish]

You mad @Dawg?

You don't like me pointing out the "separate but equal" treatment of conservatives and libbies here?

We've been through this before. The moderators have put out more conservatives than Libby's by far.. fact.

There's another dud of yours blown to hell

 

[Dawg]

You mad @Dawg?

You don't like me pointing out the "separate but equal" treatment of conservatives and libbies here?

Check my bans against yours while here crying like a grade schooler

 

[PhilFish]

Check my bans against yours while here crying like a grade schooler

His ban thing was blown to hell hours ago. He hasn't been banned since 2019. Fact.

 

[PNWest]

His ban thing was blown to hell hours ago. He hasn't been banned since 2019. Fact.

And well I shouldn't be. I am the most bipartisan and impartial poster on PJ. As my old buddy @Neo In The Matrix used to say I am the paragon of civility. It is not my fault that the truths I speak brings out the worst in some of our slower thinkers. It is my critics who should be banned, not I.

 

[PhilFish]

And well I shouldn't be. I am the most bipartisan and impartial poster on PJ. As my old buddy @Neo In The Matrix used to say I am the paragon of civility. It is not my fault that the truths I speak brings out the worst in some of our slower thinkers. It is my critics who should be banned, not I.

You're one of the dumbest and most inconsequential posters that have ever arrived here in these parts...

 

[PNWest]

We've been through this before. The moderators have put out more conservatives than Libby's by far.. fact.

There's another dud of yours blown to hell

And that is exactly as it should be. Liberals tend to express themselves in a far more civil manner than conservatives. It is almost always the slow thinkers that express their frustrations with their betters by their childish and rule breaking outbursts. The standard for being banned however is, in my opinion a two tiered system where it takes a really serious violation for a con to get banned whereas a liberal can get a 3 day ban for a statement directed at a conservative like "you cannot possibly be that stupid".

 

[PNWest]

You're one of the dumbest and most inconsequential posters that have ever arrived here in these parts...

You see - there you go again with the childish name calling. Proving my point.

 

[PhilFish]

And that is exactly as it should be. Liberals tend to express themselves in a far more civil manner than conservatives. It is almost always the slow thinkers that express their frustrations with their betters by their childish and rule breaking outbursts. The standard for being banned however is, in my opinion a two tiered system where it takes a really serious violation for a con to get banned whereas a liberal can get a 3 day ban for a statement directed at a conservative like "you cannot possibly be that stupid".

No it doesn't work that way. Nobody's gotten a 3-day ban for a statement like you cannot possibly be that stupid. You can pretend all you want but such a thing has never occurred.

You're desperate to keep that topic afloat, but unfortunately for you there's a record.

Liberals are very much like conservatives in the sense that they both engage in childish rule breaking outbursts. It is pervasive and repetitive. Luckily for us BD and I are as good as we are.

 

[PhilFish]

You see - there you go again with the childish name calling. Proving my point.

Well if you want to talk about childish why don't you go back to the point in this thread where you came in with your entirely made up story about Shadow banning

I mean you could try it again and we can have a little wager where I respond with your actual log... And then every poster here can see what a wee and enfeebled poster you in fact are... Having to resort over and over again to made up issues to give the appearance of some disparate treatment...

 

[PNWest]

Well if you want to talk about childish why don't you go back to the point in this thread where you came in with your entirely made up story about Shadow banning

I mean you could try it again and we can have a little wager where I respond with your actual log... And then every poster here can see what a wee and enfeebled poster you in fact are... Having to resort over and over again to made up issues to give the appearance of some disparate treatment...

Nah - I was asked to refrain from wagering after kicking out a couple of conservative posters for 30 days in a wager over who was going to be President at the end of the days on 1/20/2021. And as always I have kept my promise.

But if I were to offer a wager I would wager that you are WRONG about the bans I have received. You made the claim that I have not been banned since 2019 as you posted earlier in this thread:

His ban thing was blown to hell hours ago. He hasn't been banned since 2019. Fact.

The truth is that you have been far more willing to ban me than you admit. The record proves this:

Post #39 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-3#post-2692091

Post #45 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-3#post-2692091

#86 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-5#post-2765104

#110 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-6#post-2840351

#155 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-8#post-2938233

#167 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-9#post-3000116

Fact. Seems like it is not me that is the enfeebled one now.

 

[PhilFish]

Nah - I was asked to refrain from wagering after kicking out a couple of conservative posters for 30 days in a wager over who was going to be President at the end of the days on 1/20/2021. And as always I have kept my promise.

But if I were to offer a wager I would wager that you are WRONG about the bans I have received. You made the claim that I have not been banned since 2019 as you posted earlier in this thread:



The truth is that you have been far more willing to ban me than you admit. The record proves this:

Post #39 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-3#post-2692091

Post #45 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-3#post-2692091

#86 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-5#post-2765104

#110 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-6#post-2840351

#155 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-8#post-2938233

#167 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-9#post-3000116

Fact. Seems like it is not me that is the enfeebled one now.

 

[PhilFish]

Nah - I was asked to refrain from wagering after kicking out a couple of conservative posters for 30 days in a wager over who was going to be President at the end of the days on 1/20/2021. And as always I have kept my promise.

But if I were to offer a wager I would wager that you are WRONG about the bans I have received. You made the claim that I have not been banned since 2019 as you posted earlier in this thread:



The truth is that you have been far more willing to ban me than you admit. The record proves this:

Post #39 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-3#post-2692091

Post #45 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-3#post-2692091

#86 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-5#post-2765104

#110 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-6#post-2840351

#155 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-8#post-2938233

#167 here - https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/the-penalty-box-users-who-have-been-temp-banned-for-repeated-violations.126439/page-9#post-3000116

Fact. Seems like it is not me that is the enfeebled one now.

You may want to read them. Seems your issue with is mostly with someone other than me

 

[PNWest]

View attachment 69699

????

I've posted the actual links from the Penalty Box thread that EVERYONE can see which proves that you were mistaken in claiming that I have not been banned since 2019. I have no idea what the information you posted is or where it came from. I'm not a moderator here so I don't have access to these log files. But I proved my point by showing links to the public record here. Is the Penalty Box thread incorrect? Regular posters do not have access to this thread.

 

[PhilFish]

????

I've posted the actual links from the Penalty Box thread that EVERYONE can see which proves that you were mistaken in claiming that I have not been banned since 2019. I have no idea what the information you posted is or where it came from. I'm not a moderator here so I don't have access to these log files. But I proved my point by showing links to the public record here. Is the Penalty Box thread incorrect? Regular posters do not have access to this thread.

In the post immediately above you said that I have been more than willing to ban you...

I'm going to get you post references the majority of which belong to someone else

 

[PNWest]

You may want to read them. Seems your issue with is mostly with someone other than me

I don't have an issue with you. I have an issue with a misstatement you made. You claimed that I had not been banned since 2019. That was not true. I proved it. You did in fact ban me for my very humorous, if a bit off color insinuation about Trump's little boy.

 

[PhilFish]

I don't have an issue with you. I have an issue with a misstatement you made. You claimed that I had not been banned since 2019. That was not true. I proved it. You did in fact ban me for my very humorous, if a bit off color insinuation about Trump's little boy.

Yes. Thank you. It was not true.

You in fact completely dispelled the 'shadow ban' claim.

There have in fact been many, not just by me but mostly by others..for your poor behavior.

You proved it...yup...no shadow ban..but àctually lots of bans.
I have no issue with you either, other than where lies are propagated. Thanks for doing it...(dispelling it) for me.



#ropeadope.

Good day.

 

[PhilFish]

I don't have an issue with you. I have an issue with a misstatement you made. You claimed that I had not been banned since 2019. That was not true. I proved it. You did in fact ban me for my very humorous, if a bit off color insinuation about Trump's little boy.

PS..we don't do molestation insinuations here..hence that ban. Got a real molestation accusation..feel free (watch ..like some child you will..)to discuss.
Meanwhile, that last was when....October 21? Wow....further dispelling these voluminous shadow bans

Boy you really did your team in huh? 7 months no ban for you you say? Yes..thanks for that

 

[PNWest]

Yes. Thank you. It was not true.

You in fact completely dispelled the 'shadow ban' claim.

There have in fact been many, not just by me but mostly by others..for your poor behavior.

You proved it...yup...no shadow ban..but àctually lots of bans.
I have no issue with you either, other than where lies are propagated. Thanks for doing it...(dispelling it) for me.



#ropeadope.

Good day.

Nope I proved your shadow bans - You banned a poster over the last weekend and it never was posted until that fact got around AFTER that poster returned.

Even in the post you finally made about it you admitted that fact when you did post it saying - "Retro... [user name ommited] was banned a couple days back for telling a mod to gfy. " A clear admission that the post was not put up until much later, ie. it was a shadow ban. Who knows how many others there have been? You can claim that you just forgot to make the post but it was still a shadow ban. You made two claims in this thread already:

1) That I, the greatest poster here had not been banned since 2019. Clearly that has been proven false. You've admitted this.

2) That there are no shadow bans. That is proven false also using your own words and the timing of that post.

Call it what you will. It was a shadow ban in my book whether it was deliberate or not.

Have a good day to you too.