New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

America Makes Aircraft Carriers, China Makes Money

AIL

Jet fuel that's a good one.
China makes big progress in various scientific fields America can only bully other counters not to buy Chinese products because America can not compete and is and is at big disadvantage .


America Makes Aircraft Carriers, China Makes Money


By Fred Reed

May 12, 2021 "Information Clearing House" - - "UNZ" - First, America increasingly relies on strong-arm tactics instead of competence. For example, in the de facto 5G competition, Washington cannot offer Europe a better product at a better price, so it forbids European countries to buy from China. The US cannot compete with China in manufacturing, so it resorts to a trade war. The US cannot make the crucial EUV lithography equipment to make advanced semiconductors, as neither can China, but it can forbid ASML, the Dutch company, from selling to China. Similarly, the US cannot compete with Russia in the price of natural gas to Europe, so by means of sanctions it seeks to keep Europe from buying from Russia. This is not reassuring.

Second, the Chinese are a commercial people, agile, fast to market, cutthroat, known for this throughout Asia. America is a bureaucratized military empire, torpid by comparison. America has legacy control over a few important technologies, most notably the crucial semiconductor field and the international financial system. Washington is using these to try to cripple China’s advance.

A consequence has been a realization by the Chinese that America is not a competitor but an enemy, and a subsequent explosion of investment and R&D aimed at reducing dependence on American technology. There is the well-known 1.4 trillion-dollar five-year plan to this end. One now encounters a flood of stories about advances in tech “to which China has intellectual-property rights” or similar wording.

They seem deadly serious about this. Given that Biden couldn’t tell a transistor from an ox cart, I wonder whether he realizes that every time the US pushes China to become independent in x, American firms lose the Chinese market for X, and later get to compete with Chinese X in the international market. Anyway, give Trump his due. He lit this fuse.

A few snippets

Prototype of China’s 385 mph maglev train
Prototype of China’s 385 mph maglev train
The above beast, developed entirely in China, is the first to use high-temperature superconducting magnets to keep the train floating just above the rails. HTSC magnets are a Big Deal because they can achieve superconductivity using liquid nitrogen as coolant instead of liquid helium for classic superconductivity, this costing, say the Chinese, a fiftieth of the price of using helium. The use of HTSC is very, very slick. The train will extensively use carbon-fiber materials to keep weight down, suggesting that the Chinese cannot distinguish between a train and an airplane.


More Chinese technology

 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
China makes big progress in various scientific fields America can only bully other counters not to buy Chinese products because America can not compete and is and is at big disadvantage .


America Makes Aircraft Carriers, China Makes Money


By Fred Reed

May 12, 2021 "Information Clearing House" - - "UNZ" - First, America increasingly relies on strong-arm tactics instead of competence. For example, in the de facto 5G competition, Washington cannot offer Europe a better product at a better price, so it forbids European countries to buy from China. The US cannot compete with China in manufacturing, so it resorts to a trade war. The US cannot make the crucial EUV lithography equipment to make advanced semiconductors, as neither can China, but it can forbid ASML, the Dutch company, from selling to China. Similarly, the US cannot compete with Russia in the price of natural gas to Europe, so by means of sanctions it seeks to keep Europe from buying from Russia. This is not reassuring.

Second, the Chinese are a commercial people, agile, fast to market, cutthroat, known for this throughout Asia. America is a bureaucratized military empire, torpid by comparison. America has legacy control over a few important technologies, most notably the crucial semiconductor field and the international financial system. Washington is using these to try to cripple China’s advance.

A consequence has been a realization by the Chinese that America is not a competitor but an enemy, and a subsequent explosion of investment and R&D aimed at reducing dependence on American technology. There is the well-known 1.4 trillion-dollar five-year plan to this end. One now encounters a flood of stories about advances in tech “to which China has intellectual-property rights” or similar wording.

They seem deadly serious about this. Given that Biden couldn’t tell a transistor from an ox cart, I wonder whether he realizes that every time the US pushes China to become independent in x, American firms lose the Chinese market for X, and later get to compete with Chinese X in the international market. Anyway, give Trump his due. He lit this fuse.

A few snippets

Prototype of China’s 385 mph maglev train
Prototype of China’s 385 mph maglev train
The above beast, developed entirely in China, is the first to use high-temperature superconducting magnets to keep the train floating just above the rails. HTSC magnets are a Big Deal because they can achieve superconductivity using liquid nitrogen as coolant instead of liquid helium for classic superconductivity, this costing, say the Chinese, a fiftieth of the price of using helium. The use of HTSC is very, very slick. The train will extensively use carbon-fiber materials to keep weight down, suggesting that the Chinese cannot distinguish between a train and an airplane.


More Chinese technology

The Chinese economy serves the Chinese military. They have an aircraft carrier and are struggling to get to where they can compete in that technology. So who has true aircraft carriers? The British, the French, the Russians, India and China...

The US has 10 in service and several under construction. Each normally carries 50 combat aircraft.

The Chinese have two. Each unable to launch a fully loaded and fueled aircraft because it has no catapult system. They hope to build one in the coming years.

The Russians have one that is so unreliable it is accompanied wherever it goes by a tug. They can put 22 combat aircraft on it, but they can't seem to keep the toilets working. They also have a plan to add another carrier to their fleet.

The Brits have two under construction. They will each carry 36 combat planes.

France has one carrier and one under construction. The operational ship has 26 combat planes.

India has two carriers...one is the oldest afloat. The old one carries 9 planes and the newer one 36 planes.

Spain has two that can each carry 10 Harrier jets.

All others classified as carriers are for helicopters only.

The lesson learned by Britain during the Falklands war was that trying to project power around the world requires the use of carrier born air wings.

The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait could have been prevented if GHW Bush had put two aircraft carriers off the coast and supported Kuwait.
 

AIL

Jet fuel that's a good one.
The Chinese economy serves the Chinese military. They have an aircraft carrier and are struggling to get to where they can compete in that technology. So who has true aircraft carriers? The British, the French, the Russians, India and China...

The US has 10 in service and several under construction. Each normally carries 50 combat aircraft.

The Chinese have two. Each unable to launch a fully loaded and fueled aircraft because it has no catapult system. They hope to build one in the coming years.

The Russians have one that is so unreliable it is accompanied wherever it goes by a tug. They can put 22 combat aircraft on it, but they can't seem to keep the toilets working. They also have a plan to add another carrier to their fleet.

The Brits have two under construction. They will each carry 36 combat planes.

France has one carrier and one under construction. The operational ship has 26 combat planes.

India has two carriers...one is the oldest afloat. The old one carries 9 planes and the newer one 36 planes.

Spain has two that can each carry 10 Harrier jets.

All others classified as carriers are for helicopters only.

The lesson learned by Britain during the Falklands war was that trying to project power around the world requires the use of carrier born air wings.

The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait could have been prevented if GHW Bush had put two aircraft carriers off the coast and supported Kuwait.
Afghanistan and Iraq wars could have been prevented it did not matter that Bin laden was in Afghanistan .. The Taliban said shows us the evidence that bin laden was involved with 9/11 and we will hand over bin laden for trail but bush said no

decision was done on sept 20 2001

General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned -Seven Countries In Five Years (2007)



 

AIL

Jet fuel that's a good one.
The Chinese economy serves the Chinese military. They have an aircraft carrier and are struggling to get to where they can compete in that technology. So who has true aircraft carriers? The British, the French, the Russians, India and China...

The US has 10 in service and several under construction. Each normally carries 50 combat aircraft.

The Chinese have two. Each unable to launch a fully loaded and fueled aircraft because it has no catapult system. They hope to build one in the coming years.

The Russians have one that is so unreliable it is accompanied wherever it goes by a tug. They can put 22 combat aircraft on it, but they can't seem to keep the toilets working. They also have a plan to add another carrier to their fleet.

The Brits have two under construction. They will each carry 36 combat planes.

France has one carrier and one under construction. The operational ship has 26 combat planes.

India has two carriers...one is the oldest afloat. The old one carries 9 planes and the newer one 36 planes.

Spain has two that can each carry 10 Harrier jets.

All others classified as carriers are for helicopters only.

The lesson learned by Britain during the Falklands war was that trying to project power around the world requires the use of carrier born air wings.

The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait could have been prevented if GHW Bush had put two aircraft carriers off the coast and supported Kuwait.
with todays intelligent missiles they can fire a missile from one side of the world and hit a ait craft carrier on the other side of the world your aircraft carriers are sitting ducks
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
with todays intelligent missiles they can fire a missile from one side of the world and hit a ait craft carrier on the other side of the world your aircraft carriers are sitting ducks
were you in the navy? I was. Have you been on a carrier? I have. Ever seen a phalanx in operation?

In fact, you don't know shit.
 
Last edited:

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
were you in the navy? I was. Have you been on a carrier? I have. Ever seen a phalanx in operation?

In fact, you don't know shit.
What carrier were you on_____________________?

You're an amazing lil' male, lived Everywhere, been Everywhere, know all Lib politicians, work full time while in PJ 24/7 but first time you've posted of being on a "Carrier"................
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
What carrier were you on_____________________?

You're an amazing lil' male, lived Everywhere, been Everywhere, know all Lib politicians, work full time while in PJ 24/7 but first time you've posted of being on a "Carrier"................
Why do you constantly lie? I never posted I met all lib politicians. Never posted I've lived everywhere.

Again, why do you tell lies so often.
 

TheTrueRepublican

Council Member
Yet we make fun of someone for bartending in order to pay for college. Yet we call college liberal indoctrination centers. Yet we call intellectual white collar jobs weak while a “real man” works with their hands mining coal. Yet we make fun of teachers whenever they go on strike. Yet we blame teachers when we can’t raise our kids right.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
What carrier were you on_____________________?

You're an amazing lil' male, lived Everywhere, been Everywhere, know all Lib politicians, work full time while in PJ 24/7 but first time you've posted of being on a "Carrier"................
cvn 65...nice visit. Fire fighting class. I was on an AFS.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Afghanistan and Iraq wars could have been prevented it did not matter that Bin laden was in Afghanistan .. The Taliban said shows us the evidence that bin laden was involved with 9/11 and we will hand over bin laden for trail but bush said no

decision was done on sept 20 2001

General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned -Seven Countries In Five Years (2007)



The Taliban never offered to turn Bin Laden over to the US.
 

AIL

Jet fuel that's a good one.
The Taliban never offered to turn Bin Laden over to the US.
You are the typical dumb Yankee think you knm0ow it all but in reality you know [Unwelcome language removed] all.


Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
9.30pm update: * Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt
* Second week of airstrikes starts
* Taliban urges US to halt bombing



President George Bush rejected as "non-negotiable" an offer by the Taliban to discuss turning over Osama bin Laden if the United States ended the bombing in Afghanistan.
Returning to the White House after a weekend at Camp David, the president said the bombing would not stop, unless the ruling Taliban "turn [bin Laden] over, turn his cohorts over, turn any hostages they hold over." He added, "There's no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he's guilty". In Jalalabad, deputy prime minister Haji Abdul Kabir - the third most powerful figure in the ruling Taliban regime - told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence that Bin Laden was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US, but added: "we would be ready to hand him over to a third country".


this is one source there are other sources that say the same thing where is the evidence that Bin Laden was involved with 9/11 . There was non evidence because 9/11 was an inside job .
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You are the typical dumb Yankee think you knm0ow it all but in reality you know [Unwelcome language removed] all.


Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
9.30pm update: * Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt
* Second week of airstrikes starts
* Taliban urges US to halt bombing



President George Bush rejected as "non-negotiable" an offer by the Taliban to discuss turning over Osama bin Laden if the United States ended the bombing in Afghanistan.
Returning to the White House after a weekend at Camp David, the president said the bombing would not stop, unless the ruling Taliban "turn [bin Laden] over, turn his cohorts over, turn any hostages they hold over." He added, "There's no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he's guilty". In Jalalabad, deputy prime minister Haji Abdul Kabir - the third most powerful figure in the ruling Taliban regime - told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence that Bin Laden was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US, but added: "we would be ready to hand him over to a third country".


this is one source there are other sources that say the same thing where is the evidence that Bin Laden was involved with 9/11 . There was non evidence because 9/11 was an inside job .
To a third country..not the US. Thanks for playing...
 
Top