1. Yes they are. The SC ruled the may wear their hijab in the workplace, etc. Free to express.1. Muslims are religious.
2. A right to lead people in public worship as part of their official duties would be a right superior to those held by everyone else.
The Coach in question is of the Muslim faith1. Muslims are religious.
2. A right to lead people in public worship as part of their official duties would be a right superior to those held by everyone else.
Evidently, we can be whatever we say we are (gay/trannie) other than ChristianLet's tackle this ire from a different angle.
Are religious expressions equal to
Gender and sexual preference expressions?
To Muslim expressions by way of garb and prayer..etc...?
Yes you say?
Where?
Answer: everywhere.
That is exactly what that coach was fired for doing after being reprimanded repeatedly.1. Yes they are. The SC ruled the may wear their hijab in the workplace, etc. Free to express.
2.which is not happening. Good luck.
No, he’s a Christian. And Christians have the same right as anyone else. Not the right to force their religion on others.The Coach in question is of the Muslim faith
So, those that say they are gay or tranny have rights, but, not those that say they are Christians, hummmmmmmmmm
Again, Coach is of Muslim FaithNo, he’s a Christian. And Christians have the same right as anyone else. Not the right to force their religion on others.
He was Christian according to the filing in the case. And he had captive audiences who were required to witness his leadership of religious rites.Again, Coach is of Muslim Faith
He wasn't Forcing his religion on anyone
no more than you Force your gay life on anyone
Muslims glue gay [Unwelcome language removed] shut
aaand as it turns out.. they were in the wrong. boop.That is exactly what that coach was fired for doing after being reprimanded repeatedly.
Wrong by the standards of an extremist court rewriting the Constitution to favor Christianity at the expense of those who aren’t Christian.aaand as it turns out.. they were in the wrong. boop.
That's the making of a theocracy while ripping the Constitution apart.Wrong by the standards of an extremist court rewriting the Constitution to favor Christianity at the expense of those who aren’t Christian.
nope. not at all. the constitution is explicit. no need to rewrite.Wrong by the standards of an extremist court rewriting the Constitution to favor Christianity at the expense of those who aren’t Christian.
Yes.Let's tackle this ire from a different angle.
Are religious expressions equal to
Gender and sexual preference expressions?
To Muslim expressions by way of garb and prayer..etc...?
Yes you say?
Where?
Answer: everywhere.
yes that is corect.Yes.
Of course, it’s equally true that the establishment clause forbids the government and government workers on the payroll from seeking to establish religion.
Alright then. At last we agree.yes that is corect.
That is what the SC is doing.Yes.
Of course, it’s equally true that the establishment clause forbids the government and government workers on the payroll from seeking to establish religion.
no.Alright then. At last we agree.
The football coach violated the establishment clause by seeking to promote Christianity through prayer, right?
Ironic.no.
the football coach is free to pray. this is America. He did not promote or establish religion.
yes.Ironic.
Remember Kaepernick?