New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Ayn Rand, the good little girl and naive altruist

Inquisitor

Council Member
Contrary to popular myth and belief, Ayn Rand was nothing but a fool, a good little girl, a naïve altruist, and everything of the sort.

Ayn Rand, essentially believed that other people were entitled to respect the "rights" of others, whether it was called "capitalism" or anything else.

When in actuality, it is not in the self-interest, evolutionarily or otherwise to respect anyone's imaginary and non-existent "rights", imaginary "freedoms", or anything of the sort - but far rather in the interest of others to crush, dominate, steal, plunder, annihilate their enemies by force and fear, whether by gun, by knife, by legislation.

History, of course has shown that dominating others, owning them as slaves, stealing whatever the hell they want to, for any reason, assuming that such individuals are too weak or evolutionarily defective to defend themselves or what they imagine to be their own property, instead weakly and cowardly appealing to invented, socially constructed, imaginary "rights" or asking big daddy government, whether law enforcement, whether legislators, to defend their childish little rights, no more existant or provable than any "god" or "flying spaghetti" monster or whatever.

Altrusm, of course isn't merely "actively doing good", but is also refraining from doing "evil" which would definitely be otherwise in someone's or some group's self-interest to do very much that; by naively trying to enforce her archaic morality and version of altruism on people, asking them to pretend that others have so-called "rights" and selflessly refrain from violating said things, she was attempting to put a curb on evolution and mankind's natural nature and incentive to destroy his enemies, crush them, dominate them via force and fear, simply because he can, and because it's "fun", if for no other reason than that.

Much as it's naturally in the evolutionary self-interest of one to cheat the welfare system, or in a corporation to lobby the government to levy taxes on it's rivals; and of course, in practice only those too weak or effiminate to actively defend their rights via gun or knife point, most, in practice being far too weak to do anything of the sort, who have to worry about it anyway.

Might, makes right, Ayn Rand, like other naïve weaklings, altruists, and good little boys and girls deverse to die, be raped, plundered, evicerated by the force of evolution's might, as punishment for her own altrustiic and naïve morality, and attempt to so "selflessly" force it on others, or force them to accept it, against their own more violent nature and self-interest.
 
Contrary to popular myth and belief, Ayn Rand was nothing but a fool, a good little girl, a naïve altruist, and everything of the sort.

Ayn Rand, essentially believed that other people were entitled to respect the "rights" of others, whether it was called "capitalism" or anything else.

When in actuality, it is not in the self-interest, evolutionarily or otherwise to respect anyone's imaginary and non-existent "rights", imaginary "freedoms", or anything of the sort - but far rather in the interest of others to crush, dominate, steal, plunder, annihilate their enemies by force and fear, whether by gun, by knife, by legislation.

History, of course has shown that dominating others, owning them as slaves, stealing whatever the hell they want to, for any reason, assuming that such individuals are too weak or evolutionarily defective to defend themselves or what they imagine to be their own property, instead weakly and cowardly appealing to invented, socially constructed, imaginary "rights" or asking big daddy government, whether law enforcement, whether legislators, to defend their childish little rights, no more existant or provable than any "god" or "flying spaghetti" monster or whatever.

Altrusm, of course isn't merely "actively doing good", but is also refraining from doing "evil" which would definitely be otherwise in someone's or some group's self-interest to do very much that; by naively trying to enforce her archaic morality and version of altruism on people, asking them to pretend that others have so-called "rights" and selflessly refrain from violating said things, she was attempting to put a curb on evolution and mankind's natural nature and incentive to destroy his enemies, crush them, dominate them via force and fear, simply because he can, and because it's "fun", if for no other reason than that.

Much as it's naturally in the evolutionary self-interest of one to cheat the welfare system, or in a corporation to lobby the government to levy taxes on it's rivals; and of course, in practice only those too weak or effiminate to actively defend their rights via gun or knife point, most, in practice being far too weak to do anything of the sort, who have to worry about it anyway.

Might, makes right, Ayn Rand, like other naïve weaklings, altruists, and good little boys and girls deverse to die, be raped, plundered, evicerated by the force of evolution's might, as punishment for her own altrustiic and naïve morality, and attempt to so "selflessly" force it on others, or force them to accept it, against their own more violent nature and self-interest.
MINI-ME'S MEGALOMANIA


What you stand for would cause chaos and mutually assured destruction. When Rome was made strong by the citizens' sense of duty, its population reached 1,000,000. During the anarchy and every-man-for-himself Dark Ages, its population died down to 20,000.
 
Top