New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Boys and Girls: Affirmative action was racial discrimination!

reason10

Governor
I'll be as nice about this as I can be. And I'll use numbered talking points, to make responses easier.

1. When the Republicans won the Civil War and outlawed slavery, newly freed blacks were working, spending their money and at times opening businesses. To prevent the market competition from black owned businesses, the RACIST DEMOCRATS created Jim Crow Laws.

2. Affirmative Action for college admissions was DISCRIMINATION against whites and Asians, mostly because RACIST DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS considered blacks to be too stupid and incompetent to be able to get into college based on their test scores, so they needed a RACIST method like Affirmative Action. It's also known as the JIM CROW laws of the 20th Century.

3. The United States Supreme Court recently overturned JIM CROW AFFIRMATIVE ACTION because it violated both the 5th and 14th Amendments, concerning equal protection. Gee! Deciding something constitutional? Imagine! The Supreme Court actually having the NERVE to decide on the constitutionality of racism!

4. The ORIGINAL BUSING (a somewhat knee jerk reaction to the policies of RACIST Democrats like George Wallace, Lester Maddox, Robert KKK Byrd) was a RACIST institution. It's WHOLE purpose was to somehow put inferior black kids in the same classrooms as the superior white race kids, in the hopes of maybe superior WHITE mentality would rub off. I was in Jr. High at the time this forced integration happened and the people who were the MOST pissed off were the black students and their parents. Their children were BUSSED from their neighborhood schools across town. Back then Joe referred to this practice as creating a RACIAL JUNGLE. Personally, I was 14 and didn't care. I made friends with the black kids just fine.

5. Today, thanks to these heroes

1689000731032.png
1689000780792.png
1689000814532.png
1689000857798.png
1689000900984.png
1689000944381.png

DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE HAS BEEN OUTLAWED.

Some of the REALLY uneducated posters here tried to equate this with the return of segregation. As Ron White once said, "you can't fix stupid."

But this ruling basically says that admissions into college should be based not on the color of one's skin but rather the content of his/her test scores.

Gee! I wonder WHICH Republican hero mentioned something similar to that?
1689001161350.png

So if you believe that black students CANNOT get into college based solely on their test scores and need a RACIST law to get them admission, you are saying that black students are TOO STUPID AND INFERIOR.

Most of America doesn't believe that.
 

Attachments

protectionist

Governor
ALERT! Affirmative Action is still alive and well, and discriminating against whites all over the place. The racist, leftist scum who are doing it, keep it hidden, but somewhere all the lines, victims are going to need to step foward and challenge the AA culprits, and file lawsuits, and hit hard.. Only then will it stop.
 

protectionist

Governor
I'll be as nice about this as I can be. And I'll use numbered talking points, to make responses easier.

1. When the Republicans won the Civil War and outlawed slavery, newly freed blacks were working, spending their money and at times opening businesses. To prevent the market competition from black owned businesses, the RACIST DEMOCRATS created Jim Crow Laws.

2. Affirmative Action for college admissions was DISCRIMINATION against whites and Asians, mostly because RACIST DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS considered blacks to be too stupid and incompetent to be able to get into college based on their test scores, so they needed a RACIST method like Affirmative Action. It's also known as the JIM CROW laws of the 20th Century.

3. The United States Supreme Court recently overturned JIM CROW AFFIRMATIVE ACTION because it violated both the 5th and 14th Amendments, concerning equal protection. Gee! Deciding something constitutional? Imagine! The Supreme Court actually having the NERVE to decide on the constitutionality of racism!

4. The ORIGINAL BUSING (a somewhat knee jerk reaction to the policies of RACIST Democrats like George Wallace, Lester Maddox, Robert KKK Byrd) was a RACIST institution. It's WHOLE purpose was to somehow put inferior black kids in the same classrooms as the superior white race kids, in the hopes of maybe superior WHITE mentality would rub off. I was in Jr. High at the time this forced integration happened and the people who were the MOST pissed off were the black students and their parents. Their children were BUSSED from their neighborhood schools across town. Back then Joe referred to this practice as creating a RACIAL JUNGLE. Personally, I was 14 and didn't care. I made friends with the black kids just fine.

5. Today, thanks to these heroes

View attachment 75568
View attachment 75569
View attachment 75571
View attachment 75572
View attachment 75573
View attachment 75574

DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE HAS BEEN OUTLAWED.

Some of the REALLY uneducated posters here tried to equate this with the return of segregation. As Ron White once said, "you can't fix stupid."

But this ruling basically says that admissions into college should be based not on the color of one's skin but rather the content of his/her test scores.

Gee! I wonder WHICH Republican hero mentioned something similar to that?
View attachment 75575

So if you believe that black students CANNOT get into college based solely on their test scores and need a RACIST law to get them admission, you are saying that black students are TOO STUPID AND INFERIOR.

Most of America doesn't believe that.
I thought the SCOTUS only outlawed AA in college admissions (leaving discriminators free to use AA in other ways) I hope I'm wrong.
 

reason10

Governor
I thought the SCOTUS only outlawed AA in college admissions (leaving discriminators free to use AA in other ways) I hope I'm wrong.
The precedent is powerful. If any other entity tries to violate the Civil Rights Act, then attorneys only need to point to what the Supreme Court ruled on.
 

protectionist

Governor
The precedent is powerful. If any other entity tries to violate the Civil Rights Act, then attorneys only need to point to what the Supreme Court ruled on.
True, but AA discrimination victim need to act, as the Aa dosriminators will cntinue ti discriminate until they are forced to stop. As yet, I haven't heard of a single case of AA in job hiring, job promotions, college financial aid, business loans, etc being challenged.
 
Top