New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

C.R.T.

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
What other explanation for significantly unequal outcomes, distributed on racial lines, is there? Is it just that one race is superior to another?

Anyway, the unequal opportunity was not inferred from the unequal outcomes ... it was demonstrated ... remember?
Almost 100% of it can be explained by the difference in two-parent households, which, of course, was no different between the races back before the "great society" legislation passed. So all you are "demonstrating" is that the left's "war on poverty" destroyed the african american community's family structure. You own that!
 
It is anti-white, in that it teaches that America is a nation of white privilege. FALSE. America is a nation of BLACK privilege, as in Affirmative Action, and Joe Biden's new American Rescue Plan. CRT states that all white people are racist, and racism is inherent in "whiteness"

It also teaches kids that America is a racist nation, and teache kids ti hate America, Ti hate police, and to fully accept LGBT.

Ask the thousands of parents who found it on their kids' computers, and are raging at school boards over it. Internet is loaded with videos of them.


 
When I first heard about the mass protests against CRT, I thought it was just conservatives. Now I know it is a coalition of Republicans, Independents, and Democrats, all united in the effort to stop what all see as racist and destructive craziness.

Everyone should remember one thing, That when you open the door to racism against one race, racism against any or all races are going to come flying in through that open door.

 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
It is anti-white, in that it teaches that America is a nation of white privilege. FALSE. America is a nation of BLACK privilege, as in Affirmative Action, and Joe Biden's new American Rescue Plan. CRT states that all white people are racist, and racism is inherent in "whiteness"

It also teaches kids that America is a racist nation, and teache kids ti hate America, Ti hate police, and to fully accept LGBT.

Ask the thousands of parents who found it on their kids' computers, and are raging at school boards over it. Internet is loaded with videos of them.


Almost 100% of it can be explained by the difference in two-parent households, which, of course, was no different between the races back before the "great society" legislation passed. So all you are "demonstrating" is that the left's "war on poverty" destroyed the african american community's family structure. You own that!
Even if the Great Society was the cause of the breakdown of the family, rather than emergency relief for those whose moribund, primitively social structure wa down under the pressure of capitalist creative destruction, the disparate racial effect would still need to be explained, not taken for granted. The reason formally race-neutral policies can as you recognize have disparate racial effects is that this society already treats people of different races unequally. At any rate, the war on poverty greatly reduced the racial gap in wealth and opportunity, which is no doubt why an alarmed bipartisan elite chose to effectively destroy it under Carter/Reagan lest it work too well and undermine the system of white supremacy fundamental to capitalism.
 

EatTheRich

President
It is anti-white, in that it teaches that America is a nation of white privilege. FALSE. America is a nation of BLACK privilege, as in Affirmative Action, and Joe Biden's new American Rescue Plan. CRT states that all white people are racist, and racism is inherent in "whiteness"

It also teaches kids that America is a racist nation, and teache kids ti hate America, Ti
It is anti-white, in that it teaches that America is a nation of white privilege. FALSE. America is a nation of BLACK privilege, as in Affirmative Action, and Joe Biden's new American Rescue Plan. CRT states that all white people are racist, and racism is inherent in "whiteness"

It also teaches kids that America is a racist nation, and teache kids ti hate America, Ti hate police, and to fully accept LGBT.

Ask the thousands of parents who found it on their kids' computers, and are raging at school boards over it. Internet is loaded with videos of them.


hate police, and to fully accept LGBT.

Ask the thousands of parents who found it on their kids' computers, and are raging at school boards over it. Internet is loaded with videos of them.


Whites are better off by every objective measure, from wealth to income to housing to education. If white supremacy is a 100 lb. weight tipping the scales of Justice off balance, affirmative action is a 10 lb. counterweight on the other side.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Almost 100% of it can be explained by the difference in two-parent households, which, of course, was no different between the races back before the "great society" legislation passed. So all you are "demonstrating" is that the left's "war on poverty" destroyed the african american community's family structure. You own that!
Segregation brought it also to the white families, make babies, don't get married and let Medicaid pay for the babies
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Whites are better off by every objective measure, from wealth to income to housing to education. If white supremacy is a 100 lb. weight tipping the scales of Justice off balance, affirmative action is a 10 lb. counterweight on the other side.
Government segregation was to bring blacks up and all it accomplished was to bring whites down to same level

Segregation is a bigger failure than War on Drugs
 

EatTheRich

President
Bullshit

You weren't even alive when that game first played, I was

Cops were not needed in halls of education before that

Now must be
Segregation goes back long before you were born. Perhaps it is desegregation you oppose so vehemently?
 
Name one who would be proud that the South fought to keep blacks enslaved.
This is a typical ignorant comment commonly heard from Democrats. Most people in the south did not fight to keep blacks enslaved. Very few southerners had slaves. Many, if not most, lived miles away from where slavery was, had no TV, radio, computers, and few newspapers, if they even knew how to read.

Most of them knew nothing of slavery, never saw a black person, and didn't even know that black people existed. They fought for 1reason only. Because their towns, homes, farms, were being attacked. They were being shot at, bridges and railroads being blown up, churches burned down. What would you do to the people attacking you ? Say thank you ?

In fighting off this invasion of their lands, they rallied around the Confederate flag, and fought side by side with Confederate troops. Most southern fighters were civilians.
 

EatTheRich

President
This is a typical ignorant comment commonly heard from Democrats. Most people in the south did not fight to keep blacks enslaved. Very few southerners had slaves. Many, if not most, lived miles away from where slavery was, had no TV, radio, computers, and few newspapers, if they even knew how to read.

f t

In fighting off this invasion of their lands, they rallied around the Confederate flag, and fought side by side with Confederate troops. Most southern fighters were civilians.
A large majority who fought for the Confederacy fought for one reason: because they were drafted. The political aim of those drafting them was to force slavery on unwilling territory and preserve the slaveowners’ domination of American politics, hence the American resistance to their violence. Draft resistance and guerrilla resistance to the Confederacy were widespread in the South and concentrated (prior to large-scale entry into the war on the U.S. side by Black Southerners) in the areas with few large plantations.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
A large majority who fought for the Confederacy fought for one reason: because they were drafted. The political aim of those drafting them was to force slavery on unwilling territory and preserve the slaveowners’ domination of American politics, hence the American resistance to their violence. Draft resistance and guerrilla resistance to the Confederacy were widespread in the South and concentrated (prior to large-scale entry into the war on the U.S. side by Black Southerners) in the areas with few large plantations.
Yep those DEMOCRATS wasn't going to give up their Slaves
Especially the Black DEMOCRAT Slave Owners
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Even if the Great Society was the cause of the breakdown of the family, rather than emergency relief for those whose moribund, primitively social structure wa down under the pressure of capitalist creative destruction, the disparate racial effect would still need to be explained, not taken for granted. The reason formally race-neutral policies can as you recognize have disparate racial effects is that this society already treats people of different races unequally. At any rate, the war on poverty greatly reduced the racial gap in wealth and opportunity, which is no doubt why an alarmed bipartisan elite chose to effectively destroy it under Carter/Reagan lest it work too well and undermine the system of white supremacy fundamental to capitalism.
So it's perfectly okay that you liberal whites ruined the African American culture because you meant well? That is unbelievably ridiculous (even for you).
 
Top