Mr. Friscus
Governor
Mainstream media publications that gave wall-to-wall coverage of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 have not given any coverage on the woman who came forward last week and accused Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden of sexual in the early 90s.
Being that both Biden and Kavanaugh are either declared or shoe-in nominees for major positions in government (Biden moreso than Kavanaugh), I'd imagine both would be big stories.
Let's look at individual media sources within the first 6 days of which allegations were made public.
WASHINGTON POST
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
NEW YORK TIMES
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 90+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
MSNBC
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
CNN
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
....
Well... that's a stark difference.
And better yet, here's how Reade's claims are, by definition, far more credible than Blasey-Ford's:
1. Ford couldn't remember when or where it happened, Reade claimed exactly when and where.
2. Ford's family didn't back up her testimony, Reade's brother said she told him about it when it happened.
3. Ford has no proof she even met Kavanaugh, Reade used to work for Biden when he was a Senator.
Yet... oddly, it's the CONSERVATIVE who is focused on with infinitely flimsier charges, while the DEMOCRAT is ignored with far more substantial charges.
Odd how that always goes in one direction. It's as if... nahhhh.. there's no media bias! Silly Mr. Friscus! LOL
Being that both Biden and Kavanaugh are either declared or shoe-in nominees for major positions in government (Biden moreso than Kavanaugh), I'd imagine both would be big stories.
Let's look at individual media sources within the first 6 days of which allegations were made public.
WASHINGTON POST
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
NEW YORK TIMES
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 90+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
MSNBC
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
CNN
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0
....
Well... that's a stark difference.
And better yet, here's how Reade's claims are, by definition, far more credible than Blasey-Ford's:
1. Ford couldn't remember when or where it happened, Reade claimed exactly when and where.
2. Ford's family didn't back up her testimony, Reade's brother said she told him about it when it happened.
3. Ford has no proof she even met Kavanaugh, Reade used to work for Biden when he was a Senator.
Yet... oddly, it's the CONSERVATIVE who is focused on with infinitely flimsier charges, while the DEMOCRAT is ignored with far more substantial charges.
Odd how that always goes in one direction. It's as if... nahhhh.. there's no media bias! Silly Mr. Friscus! LOL