New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Comparing Media Coverage Of Brett Kavanaugh and Joe Biden re: Sexual Assault Claims

Mr. Friscus

Governor
Mainstream media publications that gave wall-to-wall coverage of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 have not given any coverage on the woman who came forward last week and accused Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden of sexual in the early 90s.

Being that both Biden and Kavanaugh are either declared or shoe-in nominees for major positions in government (Biden moreso than Kavanaugh), I'd imagine both would be big stories.

Let's look at individual media sources within the first 6 days of which allegations were made public.

WASHINGTON POST
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

NEW YORK TIMES
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 90+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

MSNBC
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

CNN
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0


....

Well... that's a stark difference.

And better yet, here's how Reade's claims are, by definition, far more credible than Blasey-Ford's:
1. Ford couldn't remember when or where it happened, Reade claimed exactly when and where.
2. Ford's family didn't back up her testimony, Reade's brother said she told him about it when it happened.
3. Ford has no proof she even met Kavanaugh, Reade used to work for Biden when he was a Senator.

Yet... oddly, it's the CONSERVATIVE who is focused on with infinitely flimsier charges, while the DEMOCRAT is ignored with far more substantial charges.

Odd how that always goes in one direction. It's as if... nahhhh.. there's no media bias! Silly Mr. Friscus! LOL
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
Mainstream media publications that gave wall-to-wall coverage of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 have not given any coverage on the woman who came forward last week and accused Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden of sexual in the early 90s.

Being that both Biden and Kavanaugh are either declared or shoe-in nominees for major positions in government (Biden moreso than Kavanaugh), I'd imagine both would be big stories.

Let's look at individual media sources within the first 6 days of which allegations were made public.

WASHINGTON POST
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

NEW YORK TIMES
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 90+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

MSNBC
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

CNN
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0



....

Well... that's a stark difference.

And better yet, here's how Reade's claims are, by definition, far more credible than Blasey-Ford's:
1. Ford couldn't remember when or where it happened, Reade claimed exactly when and where.
2. Ford's family didn't back up her testimony, Reade's brother said she told him about it when it happened.
3. Ford has no proof she even met Kavanaugh, Reade used to work for Biden when he was a Senator.

Yet... oddly, it's the CONSERVATIVE who is focused on with infinitely flimsier charges, while the DEMOCRAT is ignored with far more substantial charges.

Odd how that always goes in one direction. It's as if... nahhhh.. there's no media bias! Silly Mr. Friscus! LOL
Are you ok with 100% coverage of the dozens of women who have accused Trump of sexual assault also?
 

Days

Commentator
I don't see any media coverage of Biden, period. It's as if the guy is invisible. For that matter, the entire primary process fell out of the news also. I couldn't tell you what is happening with the primaries, or whether they are even happening at all.
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
Mainstream media publications that gave wall-to-wall coverage of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 have not given any coverage on the woman who came forward last week and accused Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden of sexual in the early 90s.

Being that both Biden and Kavanaugh are either declared or shoe-in nominees for major positions in government (Biden moreso than Kavanaugh), I'd imagine both would be big stories.

Let's look at individual media sources within the first 6 days of which allegations were made public.

WASHINGTON POST
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

NEW YORK TIMES
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 90+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

MSNBC
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

CNN
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0


....

Well... that's a stark difference.

And better yet, here's how Reade's claims are, by definition, far more credible than Blasey-Ford's:
1. Ford couldn't remember when or where it happened, Reade claimed exactly when and where.
2. Ford's family didn't back up her testimony, Reade's brother said she told him about it when it happened.
3. Ford has no proof she even met Kavanaugh, Reade used to work for Biden when he was a Senator.

Yet... oddly, it's the CONSERVATIVE who is focused on with infinitely flimsier charges, while the DEMOCRAT is ignored with far more substantial charges.

Odd how that always goes in one direction. It's as if... nahhhh.. there's no media bias! Silly Mr. Friscus! LOL
I read Katie Halper‘s interview with Tara Reade. Ms. Reade seems quite credible in my opinion. I do not doubt that the incident occurred, nor do I doubt that it was commonplace for big shots like Biden to just think he could “grab women by the pussy, they let you” when you are a big shot like a Senator, a movie executive, a billionaire reality TV star or a huge TV star like Bill Cosby.

That type of attitude and those types of incidents have no doubt been prevalent since the time of Judy Garland and well before that in much harsher ways in the old days pertaining to young beautiful women and rich and/or powerful old men.

If Biden was running against someone other than Trump who is the absolute poster boy for pussy grabbing, it could be a real issue in the upcoming election however in this instance it will only serve to turn this election into a tit for tat grab off going back 30-40 years and no doubt bring Trump’s alleged raping, beating and ripping the hair of his first wife at the end of their marriage. That incident was documented before Trump paid big money to have it concealed.

I am sure that Biden will deny any and all allegations regarding Reade and Flores as will Trump deny any and all allegations regarding his ex wife and the dozens of other women who have accused him of rape or sexual assault. If either the Trump campaign or the Biden Campaign want to make this an issue, they do it at their own peril.

Cheers
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
Mainstream media publications that gave wall-to-wall coverage of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 have not given any coverage on the woman who came forward last week and accused Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden of sexual in the early 90s.

Being that both Biden and Kavanaugh are either declared or shoe-in nominees for major positions in government (Biden moreso than Kavanaugh), I'd imagine both would be big stories.

Let's look at individual media sources within the first 6 days of which allegations were made public.

WASHINGTON POST
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

NEW YORK TIMES
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 90+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

MSNBC
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0

CNN
Christine Blasey Ford's Charges on Kavanaugh: 100+
Tara Reade's Charges on Biden: 0


....

Well... that's a stark difference.

And better yet, here's how Reade's claims are, by definition, far more credible than Blasey-Ford's:
1. Ford couldn't remember when or where it happened, Reade claimed exactly when and where.
2. Ford's family didn't back up her testimony, Reade's brother said she told him about it when it happened.
3. Ford has no proof she even met Kavanaugh, Reade used to work for Biden when he was a Senator.

Yet... oddly, it's the CONSERVATIVE who is focused on with infinitely flimsier charges, while the DEMOCRAT is ignored with far more substantial charges.

Odd how that always goes in one direction. It's as if... nahhhh.. there's no media bias! Silly Mr. Friscus! LOL
Biden assaulted young girls on camera, senile shits do that
 
Top