1. As if conservative policy hadn’t done far more to atomize minority families.
2. As if progressive capitalist political tendencies and the formally race-neutral (which I thought meant they couldn’t cause racial disparities, according to you) policies they propose aren’t necessary to the maintenance of the racist system.
3. As if explaining one of many mechanisms by which race privilege is perpetuated causes that race privilege to cease being a feature of our society.
To be consistent with your position here requires you to say that in 1919 when Madam Walker (who was Black) was fabulously wealthy, the Elaine massacre (one of dozens of racial massacres that year in the country) killed 240 Blacks, the Ku Klux Klan was at its heyday, and “separate but equal” was the law of the land, there was no reasonable grounds for inferring structural racism. In 1860, when William Ellison (who was Black) owned a large plantation with 68 Black slaves, the most likely determinant of success was effort. Minorities could succeed. But then, as now, the “success” of a few requires the oppression of the many … as is true even in the case of the privileged race.