New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Democrats=Do As We Demand Or You Will Be Censured

Spamature

President
And they weren’t selectively rescinding a process. Surely you don’t care to appear illiterate AND swishy…right?
Yes.

And they would tell you that she put this selective portion of the process above the constitutional rights she had promised them she would support.

The Republicans who were censored and rebuked were punished because they put the Constitution and the oath they took when being empaneled above loyalty to Trump.
 

RickWA

Senator
Yes.

And they would tell you that she put this selective portion of the process above the constitutional rights she had promised them she would support.

The Republicans who were censored and rebuked were punished because they put the Constitution and the oath they took when being empaneled above loyalty to Trump.
Kook politicians seek to situationally change process and rules every few years depending upon the stupid flavor-of-the-day policy they seek to enact. Stupid citizens look on and cheer it like brain dead chimps.

But what is operative here is the selectivity of process rule-by-legislation sought. What sort of retard support that?

Why… the leftist kind…
 

Spamature

President
Kook politicians seek to situationally change process and rules every few years depending upon the stupid flavor-of-the-day policy they seek to enact. Stupid citizens look on and cheer it like brain dead chimps.

But what is operative here is the selectivity of process rule-by-legislation sought. What sort of retard support that?

Why… the leftist kind…
First of all if the kook winger judges on the SCOTUS hadn't ruled to get rid of the voting rights act none of this would be necessary. Now if you think voting rights is a kooky issue then your estimation of what makes up a retard is a bit off the mark. How is trying to restore voting rights, one of the hallmark achievements in rights in this country, a flavor of the month issue ?

Here is John Lewis after getting his head beat in for that same "stupid flavor-of-the-day policy".



THE STORY OF BLOODY SUNDAY, MARCH 7, 1965 - YouTube1,280 × 720

1965's 'Bloody Sunday' in Selma, Alabama1,067 × 600
 

RickWA

Senator
First of all if the kook winger judges on the SCOTUS hadn't ruled to get rid of the voting rights act none of this would be necessary. Now if you think voting rights is a kooky issue then your estimation of what makes up a retard is a bit off the mark. How is trying to restore voting rights, one of the hallmark achievements in rights in this country, a flavor of the month issue ?

Here is John Lewis after getting his head beat in for that same "stupid flavor-of-the-day policy".



THE STORY OF BLOODY SUNDAY, MARCH 7, 1965 - YouTube1,280 × 720

1965's 'Bloody Sunday' in Selma, Alabama1,067 × 600
Trot out the crackpot leftist historical photos. Huzzah.

No. No good citizen approves his legislature changing rules back and forth to selectively enable agenda. That’s not just retardation…it’s THIRD WORLD retardation. It’s unacceptable.

…no matter how many times clowns call the idiocy of making temporary covid election measures permanent “voting rights acts”.

So pitiably dumb that it barely merits response.
 

Spamature

President
Trot out the crackpot leftist historical photos. Huzzah.

No. No good citizen approves his legislature changing rules back and forth to selectively enable agenda. That’s not just retardation…it’s THIRD WORLD retardation. It’s unacceptable.

…no matter how many times clowns call the idiocy of making temporary covid election measures permanent “voting rights acts”.

So pitiably dumb that it barely merits response.
Why shouldn't the provisions of the voting rights act be restored ?
We've seen as soon as they were relinquished by the court conservative states have not stopped with legislative rules changing as predicted.

Also, your state made those same measures permanent before covid.
What did the good citizens do, stop voting rather than participate in the third world retardation that is mail-in voting ?

Like you've ever had a real response.
 

RickWA

Senator
Why shouldn't the provisions of the voting rights act be restored ?
We've seen as soon as they were relinquished by the court conservative states have not stopped with legislative rules changing as predicted.

Also, your state made those same measures permanent before covid.
What did the good citizens do, stop voting rather than participate in the third world retardation that is mail-in voting ?

Like you've ever had a real response.
Was I somehow unclear about toggling congressional rule buttons of and on by fiat?
“Hey guys…it’s Tuesday…hop in one leg and revoke a rule!” “Hey, gang…it’s Wednesday…nevermind Tuesday’s rule…let’s go back…”


I’m sorry, but there’s no defense for this. And - YES - moron GOPers would do/have done the same ridiculous sort of thing. I don’t care what the desired legislation is, this is asinine.
 

EatTheRich

President
Uhhhh… because it wasn’t over a refusal to selectively rescind process on a singular specific issue ala banana republic?

Anyhoo, why is it NEVER “whataboutism” when lisping, limpwristed marxist leftists post this stuff? Nevermind. Back to your spritzer.
In one case, it was voting not to faithfully defend our republic against attack by its enemies. In another case, it was voting not to intervene to protect the constitutional right to equal racial opportunity to vote.
 

Spamature

President
Was I somehow unclear about toggling congressional rule buttons of and on by fiat?
“Hey guys…it’s Tuesday…hop in one leg and revoke a rule!” “Hey, gang…it’s Wednesday…nevermind Tuesday’s rule…let’s go back…”


I’m sorry, but there’s no defense for this. And - YES - moron GOPers would do/have done the same ridiculous sort of thing. I don’t care what the desired legislation is, this is asinine.
Because that is how rules are instated, by the fiat of the majority.

She voted against going back to a speaking filibuster. Which was the original intent. It was supposed to be a speech that did not have a time limitation, not a tool to prevent any and all legislation from passing without a 60 vote majority.

Yet, you and she still have a problem with even doing that
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
At great, sometimes deadly, peril.
Link to blacks killed while voting________________________GO

Who kills 10,000 blacks yearly_____________yes it's other Blacks

it's clear there's little use in making an OP w/out topic being Trump and the leftist jerked and derailed the hell out of Sinema OP all the left has is WHATABOUTISM
 

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Link to blacks killed while voting________________________GO

Who kills 10,000 blacks yearly_____________yes it's other Blacks

it's clear there's little use in making an OP w/out topic being Trump and the leftist jerked and derailed the hell out of Sinema OP all the left has is WHATABOUTISM
so now thread derail of your own thread attempt #3 - so blacks killing blacks is related to Sinema now? special, very special
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
so now thread derail of your own thread attempt #3 - so blacks killing blacks is related to Sinema now? special, very special
Why not, leftist had already fvcking derailed the topic way back when MV derailed Sinema with Trump and for your information un-sensible, ETR entered subject of blacks in peril of death while voting...............if it really bothers you get out of the thread or STFU.

Or will you whine again and ask for rules changes?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
so it is not about Biden and immigration - imagine that............
Biden, you want to derail with Putin's puppet Biden, ok..........

 

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Why not, leftist had already fvcking derailed the topic way back when MV derailed Sinema with Trump and for your information un-sensible, ETR entered subject of blacks in peril of death while voting...............if it really bothers you get out of the thread or STFU.

Or will you whine again and ask for rules changes?
yes rule changes for the "special posters " - I am 100% in favor so STFU
 

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Biden, you want to derail with Putin's puppet Biden, ok..........

SO THAT ONE WENT RIGHT OVER YOUR HEAD I SEE - lmao !
 
Republicans suck, but we don’t need to drag them into EVERY bloody discussion of that other foul party, right? I mean, does that really need to happen in every dang thread?
The discussion I guess is about rimming during a pandemic as far as I can tell. In my 55 years of following US politics I have never seen a group from either party practicing rimming as over 75% of today’s GOP leadership and rank and file seem to be when it comes to Donald’s anus. And yes, I do find it quite sickening.
 
Top