EatTheRich
President
Mmm. No.I mean they use "adjustments" to make the data say what they want to hear. It's called "goal seeking" statistical modeling.
Mmm. No.I mean they use "adjustments" to make the data say what they want to hear. It's called "goal seeking" statistical modeling.
In an effort to present their asylum claims as by law they were supposed to be able to do.Ah, you lied. They weren't trying to claim asylum, they were making a mass run at the border.
I knew your accusation was BS the moment I read it.
You are assuming that the only reason people aren’t charged is because they “get away with it” ... not because they aren’t guilty.So as long as they can get away with it it's not illegal?
LOL you're such a stereotypical lefty
Law means nothing to you.
Because the rulers’ class war on working people is bipartisan.So why were Cages built before 2017?
Das Kapital isn't a history book...The history books do say that. I highly recommend reading one some day.
Show me one serious history book on the Third Reich that doesn’t describe Hitler as the agent of capital.Das Kapital isn't a history book...
More lies.In an effort to present their asylum claims as by law they were supposed to be able to do.
Name one that says he was a champion of free markets.Show me one serious history book on the Third Reich that doesn’t describe Hitler as the agent of capital.
First explain what you mean by “free markets” ... the state of general competition that was typical of capitalism in its youthful, progressive period, or the state-organized rule of monopolies that that earlier state organically gave rise to and has been the invariable situation of every advanced capitalist country for over 100 years?Name one that says he was a champion of free markets.
The former, of course - the latter is a form of (soft) socialism. And it was not "organic" - it was imposed by leftists trying to "fix" their perceived flaws in free market capitalism.First explain what you mean by “free markets” ... the state of general competition that was typical of capitalism in its youthful, progressive period, or the state-organized rule of monopolies that that earlier state organically gave rise to and has been the invariable situation of every advanced capitalist country for over 100 years?
At the instigation of capitalists who needed those leftist corrections to prevent their profit system from collapsing, via the state whose direction they primarily controlled.The former, of course - the latter is a form of (soft) socialism. And it was not "organic" - it was imposed by leftists trying to "fix" their perceived flaws in free market capitalism.
No, at the insistence of communists who demand(ed) more equal outcomes, which then caused "capitalism" to "collapse."At the instigation of capitalists who needed those leftist corrections to prevent their profit system from collapsing, via the state whose direction they primarily controlled.
What you call “free market” capitalism was an early phase of capitalism, when it was dominated by manufacturing and industrial capital. What we have now is a more advanced phase of capital, dominated by the finance capital fortunes that the earlier capitalism created.
The impetus for state intervention came from finance capital, not communists. The goals were to make possible the imperialist wars modern capitalist economies depend on, to ensure the coordination of industries financial cartels needed to profit, and to give enough concessions to the working class and middle classes to prevent communist revolution.No, at the insistence of communists who demand(ed) more equal outcomes, which then caused "capitalism" to "collapse."
The wars may have been a catalyst but it's not a coincidence that both World Wars were started by "progressive" Presidents. And the goal was to "coerce" capitalism to act in ways that the progressives who implemented the state interventions desired - and certainly not to maintain free markets. That's Marxism from start to finish...The impetus for state intervention came from finance capital, not communists. The goals were to make possible the imperialist wars modern capitalist economies depend on, to ensure the coordination of industries financial cartels needed to profit, and to give enough concessions to the working class and middle classes to prevent communist revolution.
So Czar Nicholas was a Marxist?The wars may have been a catalyst but it's not a coincidence that both World Wars were started by "progressive" Presidents. And the goal was to "coerce" capitalism to act in ways that the progressives who implemented the state interventions desired - and certainly not to maintain free markets. That's Marxism from start to finish...
Czar Nicholas was a President?So Czar Nicholas was a Marxist?
No, he was a leader who started a world war that the U.S. got involved in years later. Moving the goalposts?Czar Nicholas was a President?
I clearly referred to progressive Presidents (Wilson & FDR). You are the one trying to move the goalpost here.No, he was a leader who started a world war that the U.S. got involved in years later. Moving the goalposts?
So you falsely claimed they started world wars that were started by, respectively, Czar Nicholas and Hitler. Hmm.I clearly referred to progressive Presidents (Wilson & FDR). You are the one trying to move the goalpost here.