Waste of time dealing with lying leftistYes, you did. It is right there for all to see. Such silliness.
Waste of time dealing with lying leftistYes, you did. It is right there for all to see. Such silliness.
You're not good at what punctuation means.Yes, you did. It is right there for all to see. Such silliness.
Awww sweetie, stop with your silliness. By the way, care to address the actual concept of the thread. You know, the fact the NPR was not honest…..and the article they ran with has been disputed by those who were actually involved. Tsk…tsk…tskYou're not good at what punctuation means.
I asked a question. That's why I asked you if you know what a '?' was.
I'm smiling at the topic presented as 'breaking news' in the world we live in.Awww sweetie, stop with your silliness. By the way, care to address the actual concept of the thread. You know, the fact the NPR was not honest…..and the article they ran with has been disputed by those who were actually involved. Tsk…tsk…tsk
Personally, I think when a news source presents those who put their trust in them to present facts and instead they put out falsehoods, it should indeed be discussed. Wouldn’t you agree?I'm smiling at the topic presented as 'breaking news' in the world we live in.
...and at you.
Yes, I agree.Personally, I think when a news source presents those who put their trust in them to present facts and instead they put out falsehoods, it should indeed be discussed. Wouldn’t you agree?
Absolutely. By all means, feel free to start your own thread with examples and I will engage in that thread. Now, with that being said, how about YOU address THIS particular thread instead of desperately trying to change the subject of the thread we are in right now. How about it, you in?Yes, I agree.
Do you also agree that the same should be shown when fox news presents hyped falsehoods?
Hello?Absolutely. By all means, feel free to start your own thread with examples and I will engage in that thread. Now, with that being said, how about YOU address THIS particular thread instead of desperately trying to change the subject of the thread we are in right now. How about it, you in?
Do you think I should start a thread as a counterpoint when I can do it in this thread?Absolutely. By all means, feel free to start your own thread with examples and I will engage in that thread. Now, with that being said, how about YOU address THIS particular thread instead of desperately trying to change the subject of the thread we are in right now. How about it, you in?
It’s a “denial” of something that wasn’t even said:Hello?
I addressed this thread after I read this by the OP...
"Now lefty before you wet your pants, this story is false. NPR which we pay for is a lefty talking point machine and nothing more and should be disbanded or at least lose all public funding."
How about it, you in?
I think perhaps starting your own thread, instead of engaging in your feeble attempt to high jack THIS thread might be in your best interest. But, you keep being you.Do you think I should start a thread as a counterpoint when I can do it in this thread?
Oh well, the right wing thinks they have a sound argument but when the facts are shown- they don't.It’s a “denial” of something that wasn’t even said:
“Totenberg's reporting, which has not been confirmed by POLITICO, does not allege a direct ask of Gorsuch by Sotomayor that he wear a mask. And the justices' statement makes no reference to any masking request by Roberts….
A spokesperson for NPR said the outlet stood behind its reporting.”
Gorsuch, Sotomayor deny beef over masks on the bench
“Reporting that Justice Sotomayor asked Justice Gorsuch to wear a mask surprised us,” a statement attributed jointly to the justices said. “It is false.”www.politico.com
Nah…..you have worked diligently at avoiding the actual dishonesty that NPR has displayed. It is ok, its not a surprise. It is how you roll….Hello?
I addressed this thread after I read this by the OP...
"Now lefty before you wet your pants, this story is false. NPR which we pay for is a lefty talking point machine and nothing more and should be disbanded or at least lose all public funding."
How about it, you in?
If you ignore my post above refuting your drivel, maybe it will go away.Nah…..you have worked diligently at avoiding the actual dishonesty that NPR has displayed. It is ok, its not a surprise. It is how you roll….
See? This is what it's like living in the right wing world.Nah…..you have worked diligently at avoiding the actual dishonesty that NPR has displayed. It is ok, its not a surprise. It is how you roll….
WTF are you rambling on about now? Dear lord…..NPR got nailed.If you ignore my post above refuting your drivel, maybe it will go away.
No?
;-)
Where did you acknowledge any wrongdoing by NPR?See? This is what it's like living in the right wing world.
A liberal will acknowledge wrongdoing but a right winger will fight the truth tooth and nail.
...and we continue to live with their narcissism.
I didn't. I'm highlighting the GOP of the 21st century neofascism.Where did you acknowledge any wrongdoing by NPR?
Nah….your ignoring the FACTS presented to you. NPR mislead those who put trust in them. Your silliness is noted.I didn't. I'm highlighting the GOP of the 21st century neofascism.
You talk as if NPR has masses listening to them compared to the lies fax newz spew daily.Nah….your ignoring the FACTS presented to you. NPR mislead those who put trust in them. Your silliness is noted.