LinkIsn't it ironic that Clinton's eating habits was all the rage of the right wing back in the day?
So you made of the bullshit of Clinton's eating habits, no surprise and you laugh like mv at your lie
LinkIsn't it ironic that Clinton's eating habits was all the rage of the right wing back in the day?
Are you serious?Link
There is no damn work to do, I don't remember anyone posting of wtf Clinton's ate so I knew you were blowing smokeAre you serious?
I'm tired of doing the work for you right wingers. If you want to prove me wrong, then do it.
The irony is thick.There is no damn work to do, I don't remember anyone posting of wtf Clinton's ate so I knew you were blowing smoke
When was that posted here in PJ_______________The irony is thick.
![]()
'Big Mac' Bill Clinton now a vegan
Back when he was president, Clinton was known to enjoy pretty much any kind of food, but its obvious that the president is considerably thinner these days.www.washingtonexaminer.com
Do you even know which decade we're living in?When was that posted here in PJ_______________
Which member posted that bullshit_________________
Damn right and no one posted that shit here in PJDo you know which decade we're living in?
That's because the Fray is long gone and PJ wasn't around then.Damn right and no one posted that shit here in PJ
Do you know what fray you're posting in?
It was? Hillary or Bill? I don’t recall having any concerns of such.Isn't it ironic that Clinton's eating habits was all the rage of the right wing back in the day?
I don’t recall it either.There is no damn work to do, I don't remember anyone posting of wtf Clinton's ate so I knew you were blowing smoke
It's all leftist haveI don’t recall it either.
PJ is a fray and there are no post I've witnessed of what the hell Clinton ateThat's because the Fray is long gone and PJ wasn't around then.
Are you ok, Dawg?
Appears you had the JackDo you even know which decade we're living in?
You need to put that bottle of Jack Daniels down for the night. lol
You are posting in reply to this:There is no damn work to do, I don't remember anyone posting of wtf Clinton's ate so I knew you were blowing smoke
If it had actually been covered (rather than the "Russian information operation" propaganda) in the "mainstream media?" You betcha!So how many votes did the FBI get?
Even with no evidence of a crime on the laptop...you still think that story on Twitter would have let Trump win...unreal.
What crime is evident from the laptop? It has been investigated by a prosecutor appointed by Trump since December 2019....and the only thing even close to a crime is the application to buy a hand gun. Is the "Big Guy" email from 2017 evidence that Biden had sold government policy for Hunter's customers? Nope. He was not VP in 2017 and wasn't given any shares in the new company.If it had actually been covered (rather than the "Russian information operation" propaganda) in the "mainstream media?" You betcha!
There's pictures of Joe with Hunter's business associates, evidence of meetings with Hunter's foreign "business" partners, emails between Joe and Hunter discussing his "business" dealings - all of which show Joe to be a bald faced liar for claiming he had no knowledge of Hunter's "business" affairs. Then there's just the abject sleaziness of Hunter (apples don't fall that far from the tree) in thousands of graphic photos. Only a propagandist hack would suggest there was nothing there that would have affected anyone's votes. We know for a fact it would have because polls have shown a fairly high percentage of people claiming to have voted for Joe saying that if they had been aware of what was on there they likely would have voted differently.What crime is evident from the laptop? It has been investigated by a prosecutor appointed by Trump since December 2019....and the only thing even close to a crime is the application to buy a hand gun. Is the "Big Guy" email from 2017 evidence that Biden had sold government policy for Hunter's customers? Nope. He was not VP in 2017 and wasn't given any shares in the new company.
What else you got? The story was everywhere in the news. Yes, it had all the appearances of Russian propaganda....releasing it days before the election made it suspicious. Refusing to let any other media look at the copy of the laptop hard drive made it worse. Clearly the idea was to give Biden zero time to respond.
If Giulaini had made the drive public and handed out copies to a number of media outlets back in August it would have lessened the look of an October surprise.
As it was...everyone knew they could read the NYPost article. Covering the fact that there was an article and it's allegations was part of the story...so was the letter from 50 former intel officials. You think that CNN should have put out a copy of the NYPost article and not the letter?
1. There is a picture of Joe and Hunter with one of Hunter's business associates playing golf. BFD.There's pictures of Joe with Hunter's business associates, evidence of meetings with Hunter's foreign "business" partners, emails between Joe and Hunter discussing his "business" dealings - all of which show Joe to be a bald faced liar for claiming he had no knowledge of Hunter's "business" affairs. Then there's just the abject sleaziness of Hunter (apples don't fall that far from the tree) in thousands of graphic photos. Only a propagandist hack would suggest there was nothing there that would have affected anyone's votes. We know for a fact it would have because polls have shown a fairly high percentage of people claiming to have voted for Joe saying that if they had been aware of what was on there they likely would have voted differently.
I think the actual mainstream press should have given it the coverage it deserved. As for the letter from "50 former intel oficials" we now know that it was organized at the behest of the Biden campaign FOR THE PURPOSE OF GIVING JOE REBUTTAL TALKING POINTS FOR WHEN IT CAME UP IN THE DEBATE!!! That right there is election interference by the permanent bureaucracy aied at defeating Trump
But to you there's "nothing to see here, move along." LOL!
Again you have chosen to lie about all of this to defend the corrupt shit bags you love so much. Plenty of evidence of crimes on the laptop, now even more evidence of those very crimes.So how many votes did the FBI get?
Even with no evidence of a crime on the laptop...you still think that story on Twitter would have let Trump win...unreal.
Apparently they were paid roughly 10 million to get the prosecutor fired in the Ukraine (don't think for a second that Trump getting indicted is not designed to distract from this).There's pictures of Joe with Hunter's business associates, evidence of meetings with Hunter's foreign "business" partners, emails between Joe and Hunter discussing his "business" dealings - all of which show Joe to be a bald faced liar for claiming he had no knowledge of Hunter's "business" affairs. Then there's just the abject sleaziness of Hunter (apples don't fall that far from the tree) in thousands of graphic photos. Only a propagandist hack would suggest there was nothing there that would have affected anyone's votes. We know for a fact it would have because polls have shown a fairly high percentage of people claiming to have voted for Joe saying that if they had been aware of what was on there they likely would have voted differently.
I think the actual mainstream press should have given it the coverage it deserved. As for the letter from "50 former intel oficials" we now know that it was organized at the behest of the Biden campaign FOR THE PURPOSE OF GIVING JOE REBUTTAL TALKING POINTS FOR WHEN IT CAME UP IN THE DEBATE!!! That right there is election interference by the permanent bureaucracy aied at defeating Trump
But to you there's "nothing to see here, move along." LOL!