Any event, yes you are correct there were a number of accounts favoring Clinton, some were anti-trump, many were for trump. Each warranting investigation no? If not why not, are we into investigating Russian meddling, or are we only into investigating Russian meddling from one aspect only?To my recollection the Congressional report showed a very small number of accounts posting any kind of pro-Clinton or anti-Trump messages compare to a very large number that looked to help Trump.
Mueller did not find that there was no conspiracy. He found there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute.
In Durham's report he focused on his opinions. Mueller focused on facts.
And no, Mueller actually made a specific or explicit pronouncement in that he did not find that Trump nor anyone in his campaign actively conspired with russia.
Then he added his opinion which was that it does not exonerate trump. Exoneration would have come in the form of a trial with a verdict, yes or no? Or are trials now currently conducted only on the basis of opinion?