Zam is basing his entire argument on the opinion of a CNN reporter that covers the Pentagon, State Dept, and sometimes the WH. Notice this "reporter" does not cover the DOJ.So why is it you misquote me?
I wrote this:
Did you read it? Did you read the senate intel report? Both had facts related to things like the number of social media posts intending to help Trump Vs Clinton...as well as info on the Russian hack of the DNC. Were there opinions? Yes. Were crimes documented? Yes. Any indictments? Yes.
Durham? Not so much.
You interpreted that as this:
So you've read both reports in their entirety, and your conclusion one is fact-filled, while the other is merely an opinion piece.
It's like the very partisan polls Zam likes to post. Not his opinions, just the slanted polls.