EatTheRich
President
The scheme described wouldn’t allow for adding ballots for the reasons described above.By adding democrat ballots in the cities. Who said anything about "replacing" ballots?
The scheme described wouldn’t allow for adding ballots for the reasons described above.By adding democrat ballots in the cities. Who said anything about "replacing" ballots?
Yes.You think that's impossible?
That sounds like "blah blah blah blah, blah blah, I win."The scheme described wouldn’t allow for adding ballots for the reasons described above.
It sounds like “your kitchen-sink approach to inventing hypothetical voter-fraud scenarios, without any evidence they actually occurred, runs into plausibility issues when the details of this or that allegation are considered.”That sounds like "blah blah blah blah, blah blah, I win."
If you are so convinced there is no problems in the 2020 vote count, you should agree our demand to do a deep examination of how ballots were distributed, stored and counted in the big cities. You are acting precisely like someone who has something to hide.It sounds like “your kitchen-sink approach to inventing hypothetical voter-fraud scenarios, without any evidence they actually occurred, runs into plausibility issues when the details of this or that allegation are considered.”
I have no problem with such an examination. But this is already perhaps the most scrutinized election in history, and the details you talk about have been investigated thoroughly … by the media, by state officials in every state, by Trump’s DOJ, and by the courts. Often the fishing expeditions have become pretexts for giving partisan actors, often apparent Russian agents, access to private information about voters and access to systems the security of which they have compromised.If you are so convinced there is no problems in the 2020 vote count, you should agree our demand to do a deep examination of how ballots were distributed, stored and counted in the big cities. You are acting precisely like someone who has something to hide.
Who pays for this fishing expedition we, the taxpayers already paid for audits in our states.If you are so convinced there is no problems in the 2020 vote count, you should agree our demand to do a deep examination of how ballots were distributed, stored and counted in the big cities. You are acting precisely like someone who has something to hide.
You ignore that you've already had an answer why.That sounds like "blah blah blah blah, blah blah, I win."
Your guys are dumb. Can't spell Dumb without the (D).primary elections are run by the parties....and these guys got caught.
LOL! Where were your posts complaining about Biden spending trillions on unneeded covid "mitigations" or tens of billions supporting the (endless) war in Ukraine? Or his proposals to "forgive" student loans? Look at it as just another round of "stimulus."Who pays for this fishing expedition we, the taxpayers already paid for audits in our states.
Nobody looked at the specifics I listed and you know it.I have no problem with such an examination. But this is already perhaps the most scrutinized election in history, and the details you talk about have been investigated thoroughly … by the media, by state officials in every state, by Trump’s DOJ, and by the courts. Often the fishing expeditions have become pretexts for giving partisan actors, often apparent Russian agents, access to private information about voters and access to systems the security of which they have compromised.
No. So far it has been a welfare deal for pro-Trump republicans.LOL! Where were your posts complaining about Biden spending trillions on unneeded covid "mitigations" or tens of billions supporting the (endless) war in Ukraine? Or his proposals to "forgive" student loans? Look at it as just another round of "stimulus."
I completely agree with you but too much time has elapsed from when the election and voter fraud was perpetrated. They've gone back and covered their tracks, undoubtedly. We need to fix the voting going forward and gain the power to impeach Biden, Kamala, and Garland.Nobody looked at the specifics I listed and you know it.
I agree 100% - water under the bridge. Here in PA we are considering a new election rule that you can become a poll watcher in any PA county, rather than only the one in which you live. That is a good first step.I completely agree with you but too much time has elapsed from when the election and voter fraud was perpetrated. They've gone back and covered their tracks, undoubtedly. We need to fix the voting going forward and gain the power to impeach Biden, Kamala, and Garland.
None of that will happen if we can't substantially win the culture war with the younger generations. But some of us have ceded that ground a long time ago. ;0)
So we have to agree to ALL of the left's wasteful spending we do not agree with, but can't propose ANY that you don't agree with? F*ck that...No. So far it has been a welfare deal for pro-Trump republicans.
You can propose all you like.So we have to agree to ALL of the left's wasteful spending we do not agree with, but can't propose ANY that you don't agree with? F*ck that...
That's a great rule. Really takes a swipe at collusion.I agree 100% - water under the bridge. Here in PA we are considering a new election rule that you can become a poll watcher in any PA county, rather than only the one in which you live. That is a good first step.
Any post of your posts that I saw that pretended to have evidence...I did show to be false. If I missed one please provide a link.Nobody looked at the specifics I listed and you know it.
So now you think there was collusion between poll watchers and people stealing the election?That's a great rule. Really takes a swipe at collusion.
As far as I know, I have responded to any post of yours which actually contained any specifics related to election fraud. Please provide a link to the thread that you think went unchallenged.Nobody looked at the specifics I listed and you know it.