But yet he lost New Hampshire turnout votes BY 140,000 votesTrumps primary votes are three times what oboobas were, the dems will never impeach again
MAGA - 49 STATE LANDSLIDE !
But yet he lost New Hampshire turnout votes BY 140,000 votesTrumps primary votes are three times what oboobas were, the dems will never impeach again
Of course you missed it. He lynched two American citizens in the Middle East. No arrest, no trial, no conviction, no sentencing. Straight to execution. Continuing the Democrats' long tradition of lynchings.Obama lynched people - you have a link for that - I missed it !
LOL..... so many crimes yet no proof and no justifiable case for impeachment.They won’t impeach him, even though he obviously deserves it. Everybody now knows that the GOP senators will turn a blind eye to all Trump crimes and outrages, no matter how egregious.
Only in republican math is it a landslide when the winner gets 3 million fewer votes and only manages to squeak by with less than 1% of the vote in three states.Impeachment Part II: The Sequel!
My advice, kick it off before the election. Let's turn that 45 state landslide into a 48 state landslide!
Also, who keeps telling these retards we live in a democracy? Can someone please draw a crayon picture illustrating the fact that this is a Constitutional Republic, so these midgets can understand?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrat-wont-rule-out-new-impeachment-over-roger-stone-case
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell, in an interview Wednesday, would not rule out a new impeachment effort against President Trump over his alleged interference in the criminal case of his former associate Roger Stone.
Federal prosecutors on Monday had recommended a sentence of between 87 and 108 months in prison for Stone’s conviction on seven counts of obstruction, witness tampering and making false statements to Congress on charges that stemmed from former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.
But in a stunning reversal, as Fox News first reported, leadership at the Justice Department overruled the prosecutors on the case, scaling back the proposed sentence for Stone, which immediately led Democrats to accuse Trump of interfering in the process by tweeting about his displeasure with the DOJ. Trump denies it, and the case lately has been complicated further by questions over possible juror bias.
During an interview with CNN on Wednesday, Swalwell, D-Calif., was asked whether Democrats would look to launch a new impeachment inquiry on the new controversy.
“You know, we’re not going to take our options off the table,” Swalwell, a member of the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, told CNN. “We don’t wake up in the morning wanting to impeach him.”
He added: “We want to work with him on prescription drugs, background checks, and infrastructure, but we’re not going to let him just torch this democracy because he thinks that he’s been let off once and we’re not going to do something about it.”
And as much as the “Christian” right loves him, is there any Commandment he hasn’t violated?I don't think he has committed adultery.............what.........4 times...........oh sorry !
In Trumplandia, losing by 3 million votes is a “landslide win.”Only in republican math is it a landslide when the winner gets 3 million fewer votes and only manages to squeak by with less than 1% of the vote in three states.
Don't think he has murdered anyone...And as much as the “Christian” right loves him, is there any Commandment he hasn’t violated?
;-)
Pay no attention to the fact that one was the commander of a military force at war with the US and surrendered his citizenship when he joined Al Qaeda.Of course you missed it. He lynched two American citizens in the Middle East. No arrest, no trial, no conviction, no sentencing. Straight to execution. Continuing the Democrats' long tradition of lynchings.
We are all well aware of your oft stated desire to see the coastal progressives determine the nation's entire policy agenda, which illustrates the entire sum of the differences between your ideology and Ocasio-Cotez' - exactly none! There's that (laughable) "middle" view of yours coming across loud and clear...Only in republican math is it a landslide when the winner gets 3 million fewer votes and only manages to squeak by with less than 1% of the vote in three states.
They won’t impeach him, even though he obviously deserves it. Everybody now knows that the GOP senators will turn a blind eye to all Trump crimes and outrages, no matter how egregious.
Really? So there were no republican votes in either California or New York? All 66 million votes for Clinton were in those two states?We are all well aware of your oft stated desire to see the coastal progressives determine the nation's entire policy agenda, which illustrates the entire sum of the differences between your ideology and Ocasio-Cotez' - exactly none! There's that (laughable) "middle" view of yours coming across loud and clear...
And you'd suddenly switch to support of the EC while I would still be arguing that it be kept. Same shit, different day...Really? So there were no republican votes in either California or New York? All 66 million votes for Clinton were in those two states?
Nice of you to regurgitate the RNC talking points, but we know how the right wingers would have reacted if Hillary had won the EC and lost the popular vote. Trump called the Electoral college a disaster....until he won by EC math and lost the popular vote.
Explain why Trump would prefer a popular vote? I've been against the EC for years. Probably since I worked in the Perot campaign i 1992.And you'd suddenly switch to support of the EC while I would still be arguing that it be kept. Same shit, different day...
Because he is stupid? This is precisely why your posting here mocks itself - Trump's agenda is the closest thing to Perot's since, well, Perot. Yet you "worked for Perot" and oppose Trump with ever fiber of your body. It's absurd!Explain why Trump would prefer a popular vote? I've been against the EC for years. Probably since I worked in the Perot campaign i 1992.
Not that we know of, although he does have this strange fantasy of shooting someone on 5th Avenue.Don't think he has murdered anyone...
4 times? Shucks, he probably exceeded that number during his first honeymoon.I don't think he has committed adultery.............what.........4 times...........oh sorry !
Trump stands for nothing. He's an opportunist and an arrogant, idiotic, self serving, egotistical megalomaniac at that. Perot was a conservative. He'd have fought for rational revenue and spending programs....and said so. He did not campaign on tax cuts that were in no way linked to financial reality.Because he is stupid? This is precisely why your posting here mocks itself - Trump's agenda is the closest thing to Perot's since, well, Perot. Yet you "worked for Perot" and oppose Trump with ever fiber of your body. It's absurd!
Agreed. Four is just the number of times he got caught.4 times? Shucks, he probably exceeded that number during his first honeymoon.
;-)
That was then, this is now. Running on tax increases is a death sentence for any pol's campaign. Trump has taken on the bad trade deals that Perot railed against, and has largely rebuilt the (blue collar) manufacturing sector. It looks to me like he intends to make the deficit job one in a second term. I wouldn't be surprised to see him accept (sane) revenue proposals to go along with spending cuts. Again, his agenda appears to dovetail nicely with what you so often claim you care most about.Trump stands for nothing. He's an opportunist and an arrogant, idiotic, self serving, egotistical megalomaniac at that. Perot was a conservative. He'd have fought for rational revenue and spending programs....and said so. He did not campaign on tax cuts that were in no way linked to financial reality.
He understood the concept of project management. You don not launch a nationwide campaign to implement health care without doing a pilot to find the good and bad of a proposal before spending billions. While Perot may have been tactless and shown temper to his subordinates...he also listened to those who disagree with him...Trump does not.
I worked at EDS (Perot's company) for a couple of years. I had lunch with him and two others one day. Not much to go on, but the evidence of Trump's behavior is all over the news. Perot would not have twisted the DOJ into knots to go after people who criticized him.
Which president had the kind of turnover in staff that Trump has? He is completely unable to form a team to advise him. Clearly he wants yes men and that is disaster.That was then, this is now. Running on tax increases is a death sentence for any pol's campaign. Trump has taken on the bad trade deals that Perot railed against, and has largely rebuilt the (blue collar) manufacturing sector. It looks to me like he intends to make the deficit job one in a second term. I wouldn't be surprised to see him accept (sane) revenue proposals to go along with spending cuts. Again, his agenda appears to dovetail nicely with what you so often claim you care most about.
I get it - you don't like him as a person. Neither do I. But I felt the same way about Clinton but voted for him because I believed in his agenda. Trump looks to me like an even better version of "Bubba."