New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Execs did nothing wrong..but CNN headlines it anyway..you know for Optics

CNN obviously had an issue with the fact that they did nothing wrong....so I guess they top lined it last night on their web site in block letters cause they did not want to give the impression that nothing untoward was occurring. Yeah that's it :rolleyes:
There are more stories that the news covers besides crimes. Just because they didn't do anything wrong doesn't mean the information is disposable.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
There are more stories that the news covers besides crimes. Just because they didn't do anything wrong doesn't mean the information is disposable.
Of course. I just thought it interesting that they would headline moderna execs 'dumping' stocks...that were set to trigger at a threshold outside if their control and perfectly legal and above board activity..

They could have headlined it with. " moderna executives execute perfectly legal stock transactions". But they didn't.
 

Days

Commentator
Of course. I just thought it interesting that they would headline moderna execs 'dumping' stocks...that were set to trigger at a threshold outside if their control and perfectly legal and above board activity..

They could have headlined it with. " moderna executives execute perfectly legal stock transactions". But they didn't.
It is interesting, because it is more evidence of CNN propaganda replacing/running CNN news. Elon Musk, of all people, says we have become a fascist state. Well, the free press becoming the propaganda arm of the political parties has a lot to do with that.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
It is interesting, because it is more evidence of CNN propaganda replacing/running CNN news. Elon Musk, of all people, says we have become a fascist state. Well, the free press becoming the propaganda arm of the political parties has a lot to do with that.
Yes. There was absolutely nothing illegal in the transactions. It is simply a case of wanting to make executive look bad. Despite they're having done nothing wrong
 

Days

Commentator
Yes. There was absolutely nothing illegal in the transactions. It is simply a case of wanting to make executive look bad. Despite they're having done nothing wrong
agreed.

so did you see my Eureka moment in this thread? Is anything happening with this commentator idea? I'm painfully aware that I'm going around posting with this "Commentator" description, which, for the moment, might as well read "king of the world" because I am not either of those two.
 
Of course. I just thought it interesting that they would headline moderna execs 'dumping' stocks...that were set to trigger at a threshold outside if their control and perfectly legal and above board activity..

They could have headlined it with. " moderna executives execute perfectly legal stock transactions". But they didn't.
Nit-picking word choice. "Dumping" accurately describes their action.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
agreed.

so did you see my Eureka moment in this thread? Is anything happening with this commentator idea? I'm painfully aware that I'm going around posting with this "Commentator" description, which, for the moment, might as well read "king of the world" because I am not either of those two.
What do you want your subtitle to read?

I saw it. I don't know if or how what you posit can be achieved. The others are away and I am preoccupied with stuff in the real world.. popping in and out on breaks .
 

RickWA

Senator
wrong... "dumping" is the exact opposite of what happened.
Not “wrong”...but rather intentionally and purposefully misleading and propagandizing - by design - with every possible syllable. This garbage is borne of neither ignorance nor error. It’s calculated. Always.
 

Days

Commentator
Not “wrong”...but rather intentionally and purposefully misleading and propagandizing - by design - with every possible syllable. This garbage is borne of neither ignorance nor error. It’s calculated. Always.
IOW, it is the same propaganda that CNN was pushing... in this case, the DNC propaganda.

agreed
 
Although the fortuitous timing of the transactions may raise eyebrows, Charles Whitehead, professor at Cornell Law School, said the stock sales did not appear to raise any legal red flags.

"On its face, there is nothing wrong with these trades," Whitehead said. "It's what a 10b5-1 plan is intended for, assuming the requirements are met."
These plans regulate when and how many shares company insiders, including directors and executives, are allowed to sell. The transactions are typically executed automatically, without the insiders taking any action.


____________________________

WITCHES! BURN THEM...BURN THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow, look at quote that came directly from the article. Looks like it says none of the actions were illegal right there smack dab in the middle of the article.
 
Nope, none are correct for this particular situation, and that has already been explained and expounded upon throughout the thread.
This thread is mostly just reading too much into word choice. If you don't like it then write it better. But not you, someone who understands the value of brevity.
 
Top