New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

FBI Director Wray yields to Trump’s lawlessness

Jack4freedom

Governor
They told him it was a transition meeting pertaining to his job when their stated goal was to find a way to prosecute him.
Imagine that. Law enforcement officers using sleazy tactics in order to make a case against someone.....I’m shocked, I tell you...just shocked!!!
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
They told him it was a transition meeting pertaining to his job when their stated goal was to find a way to prosecute him.
I know this might come as a real shock to you, but whenever a law enforcement agency suspects someone is guilty of any crime they ALWAYS attempt to interrogate him before he hires an attorney under the guise of having a friendly conversation. Watch Dateline or Columbo some day. It’s standard procedure
 

EatTheRich

President
I know this might come as a real shock to you, but whenever a law enforcement agency suspects someone is guilty of any crime they ALWAYS attempt to interrogate him before he hires an attorney under the guise of having a friendly conversation. Watch Dateline or Columbo some day. It’s standard procedure
Hopefully this review results in a good hard look at that tactic.
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
I know this might come as a real shock to you, but whenever a law enforcement agency suspects someone is guilty of any crime they ALWAYS attempt to interrogate him before he hires an attorney under the guise of having a friendly conversation. Watch Dateline or Columbo some day. It’s standard procedure
Hopefully this review results in a good hard look at that tactic.
Usually defense attorneys will challenge these tactics and the Judge will rule on whether they are legal in pretrial motions. It is however very unusual for an AG to make that case.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
I know this might come as a real shock to you, but whenever a law enforcement agency suspects someone is guilty of any crime they ALWAYS attempt to interrogate him before he hires an attorney under the guise of having a friendly conversation. Watch Dateline or Columbo some day. It’s standard procedure
We aren't talking some parnut, fruitman, tom, dick, or harry. We are talking the National Security Adviser of the United States. It's a coup attempt.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
I know this might come as a real shock to you, but whenever a law enforcement agency suspects someone is guilty of any crime they ALWAYS attempt to interrogate him before he hires an attorney under the guise of having a friendly conversation. Watch Dateline or Columbo some day. It’s standard procedure
Even if the "suspect" is an incoming National Security Adviser and they have no reason to suspect he committed a crime?
 

Mick

The Right is always right
They had reason to believe that he was a threat to national security.
The Washington's FBI field office said they had no case against Flynn on January 4, 2017. Because you state something doesn't make it true. Facts matter. Left wing psychosis does not.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
It was hoped that Wray was the last holdout in the Trump administration willing to enforce the rule of law.

Nope. Trump has now pressured Wray into joining the Trump lawlessness - the ridiculous claim that Flynn didn’t violate the law, but his investigators did.

The Banana Republic of Trumplandia...

We are all still trying to figure out what "rule of law" Trump and Wray are unwilling to "enforce" by probing left wing misconduct among Obama's cronies. Three pages in and we still haven't gotten an answer from you, bug.

Maybe that's because actually probing Obama crony misconduct IS the following the "rule of law". How dare the criminal cabal be forced to account!

:D
 
Last edited:

Jack4freedom

Governor
The Washington's FBI field office said they had no case against Flynn on January 4, 2017. Because you state something doesn't make it true. Facts matter. Left wing psychosis does not.
There is a difference between not having a case against someone and not suspecting he is a threat to national security. They had no case against Al Capone until they got ahold of his books by using some pretty sleazy tactics including spying on him and all of his associates then breaking into his house and his safe. Then, they made a case against him. That’s how LE works.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
It was hoped that Wray was the last holdout in the Trump administration willing to enforce the rule of law.

Nope. Trump has now pressured Wray into joining the Trump lawlessness - the ridiculous claim that Flynn didn’t violate the law, but his investigators did.

The Banana Republic of Trumplandia...

Wray is probably trying to stay out of prison, where he belongs.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
There is a difference between not having a case against someone and not suspecting he is a threat to national security. They had no case against Al Capone until they got ahold of his books by using some pretty sleazy tactics including spying on him and all of his associates then breaking into his house and his safe. Then, they made a case against him. That’s how LE works.
Michael Flynn was NATIONAL SECURITY adviser. He, in conjunction wit the National Security Council, are the sole authorities on who or what is a threat to our national security. Rogue, since been terminated for misconduct, left wing FBI agents are not.

The guy who claimed for months that the Fruitman and Parnas hoax was real is now trying to tell us that rogue FBI agents get to decide on what are national security threats over the actual National Security Council. Let me give you some advice. Your position is not sane. This was a coup attempt.
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
We are all still trying to figure out what "rule of law" Trump and Wray are unwilling to "enforce" by probing left wing misconduct among Obama's cronies. Three pages in and we still haven't gotten an answer from you, bug.
And neither your idol Durham or his lard assed lackey boss ‘Candy’ Barr have gotten one indictment against all of those evil fiends from the Obama criminal cabal. As usual, just a bunch of hot air from Larry Klayman‘s judicial watch and other right wing gossip rags. My guess is that Wray will conduct another investigation, find that his men acted in our national interest then you guys will start slinging poo at him. Lol
 

Mick

The Right is always right
And neither your idol Durham or his lard assed lackey boss ‘Candy’ Barr have gotten one indictment against all of those evil fiends from the Obama criminal cabal. As usual, just a bunch of hot air from Larry Klayman‘s judicial watch and other right wing gossip rags. My guess is that Wray will conduct another investigation, find that his men acted in our national interest then you guys will start slinging poo at him. Lol
The National Security Adviser in collaboration with the National Security Council decides on what national security threats are. Not rogue Obama cronies in the FBI.

And there will be Durham indictments. And all the people have been FIRED FOR MISCONDUCT already. You shot your mouth off about how Parnut and Fruitman would take Trump down before looking like a fool. Now you are shooting your mouth off regarding Durham while his investigation is active. Not particularly bright, eh?
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
Michael Flynn was NATIONAL SECURITY adviser. He, in conjunction wit the National Security Council, are the sole authorities on who or what is a threat to our national security. Rogue, since been terminated, left wing FBI agents are not.

The guy who claimed for months that the Fruitman and Parnas hoax was real is now trying to tell us that rogue FBI agents get to decide on what are national security threats over the actual National Security Council. Let me give you some advice. Your position is not sane. This was a coup attempt.
Trump and Guiliani associates Fruman and Parnas are both still out on bail wearing ankle monitors after being INDICTED for slushing Russian mob money into the coffers of GOP candidates. Look it up champ. But maybe Barr will step in, cut off their ankle bracelets and drop the charges against them too....Also, in case you haven’t heard, Flynn was only the National Security Advisor for a couple weeks before TRUMP fired him for being a lying sack of shit, after which he was INDICTED, pleaded guilty and became an informant for Mueller’s investigation. You can look that up too.
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
The National Security Adviser in collaboration with the National Security Council decides on what national security threats are. Not rogue Obama cronies in the FBI.

And there will be Durham indictments. And all the people have been FIRED FOR MISCONDUCT already. You shot your mouth off about how Parnut and Fruitman would take Trump down before looking like a fool. Now you are shooting your mouth off regarding Durham while his investigation is active. Not particularly bright, eh?
People were fired under political pressure from Trump because they pointed out what a sleazy bunch of crooks Trump was surrounded with. No charges have been filed against ANY of them. Durham is chasing his tail around for lard ass Bill ‘Candy’ Barr. for posterity. They harrassed McCabe for years before a judge finally got them to admit that they didn’t have squat and forced them to either bring an indictment or clear him. Look it up champ.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Trump and Guiliani associates Fruman and Parnas are both still out on bail wearing ankle monitors after being INDICTED for slushing Russian mob money into the coffers of GOP candidates. Look it up champ. But maybe Barr will step in, cut off their ankle bracelets and drop the charges against them too
Cool. Yes, let's look it up. Oh wait, crimes that involved exactly NO ONE ELSE. Funny how this always happens to the left winger? Scream conspiracy and treason and then end up looking stupid. Parnut and Fruitman is all yours, buddy. You talked about how they were going to take Trump and Giuliani down. You even had Madcow tell you it was so. The end result? Another complete left wing fizzle job. ROFL.


Also, in case you haven’t heard, Flynn was only the National Security Advisor for a couple weeks before TRUMP fired him for being a lying sack of shit, after which he was INDICTED, pleaded guilty and became an informant for Mueller’s investigation. You can look that up too.
Once again, cool. Good for the President getting rid of him. It certainly was in his authority to do so. He was still national security adviser when Obama's cronies tried to take him down. That's a coup. And indicted? In case you haven't figured out the case has been dropped due to left winger misconduct. We call that exoneration and vindication, buddy. Where you been the last 2 weeks?

And an "informant"? An informant that helped find no collusion and expose left wingers are idiotic oafs. Yeah, that's the one. You better informants, kid. He made your nasty ilk look stupid as hell.....collusion....lmfao.

I think we've hit it, everyone...

You predicted that the bogus and flatlined Parnut and Fruitman conspiracy that was suppose to take Trump down was finally going to get him. Oops. Another left wing hoax gone rotten. Now the third member of that stooge trio is under heat for lying under oath to Congress. Impressive conspiracy. ROFL.

Meanwhile, you sit back and make predictions that Durham's criminal probe will lead to no charged crimes after Barr has all but said it would. Nice track record when trying to read your busted up magic 8 ball....like above. Lulz

Obama's cronies who tried to take Flynn down when he had nothing wrong were all terminated in some big conspiracy although it was lifetime FBI employees and Obama appointees who recommended the firings with detailed facts on misconduct. Hint: Read the IG reports.

Impressive post. Got some more doozies for me?
 
Last edited:
Top