Menu
New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Female Trump supporters think Trump's behavior is acceptable as long as it happens to other women.

Spamature

Spamature

President
Scanner said:
Good grief. Why should anybody have to have "sought then out" ? If you get sexually attacked, YOU REPORT IT TO THE POLICE. Even when the victims of Bill Clinton were attacked they went public (when he was Attorney General in Arkansas - "top cop", and POTUS)

So we're supposed to believe 7 women were attacked by Donald Trump (just a young, private citizen with no political power) and they never said a word ? (until now > 3 weeks before a presidential election) This is as PHONY as a $3 bill. Give us a break.

This is designed to deflect attention away from te Wikileaks revelations and the sex attacks of Bill Clinton, and accessory threat crimes of Hillary.
Click to expand...
One of his victims sued him back in 1997 and it was reported 7 months ago.

Report: Woman Who Dropped 1997 Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Donald Trump Now Stands By Her Allegations
 
S

Scanner

Guest
Spamature said:
One of his victims sued him back in 1997 and it was reported 7 months ago.

Report: Woman Who Dropped 1997 Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Donald Trump Now Stands By Her Allegations
Click to expand...
She DROPPED the lawsuit. So she DIDN'T sue him. And why would she SUE ? o_O Sexual assault is a serious CRIME, not a tort to sue somebody for.

Sounds like she knew he had a lot of money, and she was just going after it. And when she realized her allegations were nothing more than just that, she flaked away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
S

Scanner

Guest
Spamature said:
It's a conspiracy ! It's the shadowy international (Jewish) bankers and Mexicans and the GOP establishment ! The women are all whores and liars ! You sound as if you are as bitter as Trump that he got his comeuppance.
Click to expand...
HA HA "comeuppance" ? From who ? A bunch of golddiggers who never filed a criminal charge for a serious crime, but now decide to speak out just before a presidential election ? :rolleyes:

Boy, does this ever stink. I f the Democrats are paying these women, I doubt if they would be so stupid as to cut them a check, but nevertheless, the first thing that ought to be done is to check their bank accounts for any unusual large deposits (ex. $50,000) of money with no explained source.

Next best thing would be to check govt records for a recent new car registration, boat, house, etc. and see if they made any large purchases, with no explanation of a money source.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
connieb said:
You are right, unlike HRC, most conservative women would not accept the men in their lives mistreating women, molesting them and sexually harassing them.

What conservative women believe however, it is up to each individual woman to stand up for herself. If a woman fails to stand up for herself and object to such mistreatment of herself, and that she may directly witness, her credibility is rightfully questioned. Like many things, people think about stuff they did, behavior they engaged in and situations that their their youth and inexperience led them to think was ok and or acceptable at the time. But, their rethinking a situation 10, 20 or 30 years later, and does not equate to a lack of consent - AT THAT MOMENT.

Also being women ourselves,we know that there are many things women will do to attain the affection and attention of men they either deem attractive or powerful or both. We also know that since the dawn of time women have been effectively trading on their sexuality and sex appeal - to get ahead and attain status, wealth and security. So we know that here are plenty of situations where a woman would consent to behavior from a man - if she thinks there is the possibility that she can use that to her advantage in some way. We know, that we are manipulative like that and really don't have any patience for someone crying foul later because it is personally or politically expedient to do so.

Do not mistake that for tolerating that behavior. We don't. We are just ALSO willing to acknowledge that a woman's refusal to stand up for herself is akin to her consent and willingness to put up with that kind of behavior.

As to what Donald Trump did or did not do with those women.. like Bill Clinton, I think it will have little to no effect on his actual effectiveness as President. . at least he will know he won't be a first to get a blowjob in the oval office by a staffer.

connie
Click to expand...
In what situation would a woman consent to a man grabbing her pussy without asking?
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Dawg said:
I don't give a flip about her paperwork, you lied when you said threatened her.........LIAR

The accuser just on TV said Don grabbed her shoulders, kissed her and felt of her breast, NOW WAIT TO HEAR THIS then months later she met him in California.......if you've been molested, why met him again in California........☻
Click to expand...
Sometimes survivors of sexual assaults are forced by circumstances into uncomfortable proximity with the perpetrators.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Spamature said:
Racist ? So you are telling me when you used to make your "Democrat Plantation" references you were being racist ?

That is quite and admission.
Click to expand...
Old news. That poster has openly acknowledged being racist on several occasions. Doesn't stop him from accusing other posters of racism to score political points, though.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
connieb said:
There you go insulting these women by claiming they are weak and need a champion. Don't you all get tired of pimping states of perpetual victim hood?

they are taking on this powerful man at a very convenient time with very powerful support so don't bother to act like they are David and Goliath they are liars who had no prob with the behavior when it worked for them not to but now that they can pimp it they want to cry victim. I have no respect for people like that and am not inclined to feel sympathy for such manipulative crap.
Click to expand...
You accuse them of lying even though their stories are consistent with Trump's own recorded admission. Your only reason for thinking they "had no prob with the behavior" at the time is your unsupported assumption.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Scanner said:
Because they know damn well that the accusations against Trump are a farce. Where has this woman from 35 year ago, been for 35 years, only to suddenly surface 3 weeks before a presidential election ? Yeah right!!! Wonder how much she's being paid ?

The biased media should be reporting TODAY about the 3 victims of Bill AND HILLARY Clinton who spoke out today on the Sean Hannity show (Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, & Juanita Brodderick), but instead all we hear about are these phonies attacking Donald Trump
Click to expand...
Women have been publicly accusing Trump of sexual assaults and rapes, often strikingly similar to those described by Trump himself on the Access Hollywood tape, since at least 1989. Whenever a woman came forward over the years, Trump stopped at nothing to ruin her life--as he's consistently done with everyone who's stood in his way in business, politics, and personal life. Now they are coming forward because Trump's recorded admission gives their accusations credibility, and because there is safety in numbers. We saw the same thing with Bill Cosby.

Gennifer Flowers engaged in a consensual affair with Clinton. A virulently anti-Clinton special prosecutor conducting an open-ended, high-budget witch hunt was not able to find enough evidence of Paula Jones's allegations (which even if true would not constitute a violation of the country's sexist laws--unlike groping a woman without her consent--which included provably false claims that Clinton's penis was bent, and which were deliberately employed as a means to entrap Clinton regarding his consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky) or Juanita Broaddrick's allegations (which was denied in a sworn affidavit). Does that mean that he is definitely not guilty? Of course not. But the mere existence of accusations against him does not make Donald Trump--against whom there is far more evidence--an acceptable candidate for president. At most, it means that William Jefferson Clinton (who is not running this year) is also an unacceptable candidate for president.
 
S

Scanner

Guest
EatTheRich said:
You accuse them of lying even though their stories are consistent with Trump's own recorded admission. Your only reason for thinking they "had no prob with the behavior" at the time is your unsupported assumption.
Click to expand...
Sounds like YOU are making an unsupported assumption. The women accusing Trump have NO CREDIBILITY whatsoever. They don't have a shred of evidence to support these wild charges. They are a laughingstock. If what they said had been true, why wouldn't they have filed POLICE charges for these serious crimes ?

But they did nothing but suddenly bitch about things from dozens of years ago, 3 weeks before a presidential election. They have the credibility of a warthog.

As I said in Post # 45, their bank accounts need to be checked, as well as any new registrations of cars, boats, etc, to check for recent large $$ purchases from money coming from nowhere (nowhere but the DNC) :D
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Scanner said:
I DO. Every media outlet who won't have them on to speak (except San Hannity). Sounds like you didn't click the links and read them.
Click to expand...
They already spoke to the media 2 decades ago. There is no news story to give the media a reason to rehash their discredited accusations.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Scanner said:
She DROPPED the lawsuit. So she DIDN'T sue him. And why would she SUE ? o_O Sexual assault is a serious CRIME, not a tort to sue somebody for.

Sounds like she knew he had a lot of money, and she was just going after it. And when she realized her allegations were nothing more than just that, she flaked away.
Click to expand...
Why did Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick sue?
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Scanner said:
HA HA "comeuppance" ? From who ? A bunch of golddiggers who never filed a criminal charge for a serious crime, but now decide to speak out just before a presidential election ? :rolleyes:

Boy, does this ever stink. I f the Democrats are paying these women, I doubt if they would be so stupid as to cut them a check, but nevertheless, the first thing that ought to be done is to check their bank accounts for any unusual large deposits (ex. $50,000) of money with no explained source.

Next best thing would be to check govt records for a recent new car registration, boat, house, etc. and see if they made any large purchases, with no explanation of a money source.
Click to expand...
Individuals can't choose to file criminal charges. That's up to a prosecutor ... and as we know Trump has a history of bribing prosecutors to avoid criminal charges.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Scanner said:
Sounds like YOU are making an unsupported assumption. The women accusing Trump have NO CREDIBILITY whatsoever. They don't have a shred of evidence to support these wild charges. They are a laughingstock. If what they said had been true, why wouldn't they have filed POLICE charges for these serious crimes ?

But they did nothing but suddenly bitch about things from dozens of years ago, 3 weeks before a presidential election. They have the credibility of a warthog.

As I said in Post # 45, their bank accounts need to be checked, as well as any new registrations of cars, boats, etc, to check for recent large $$ purchases from money coming from nowhere (nowhere but the DNC) :D
Click to expand...
1. Again, only 26% of sexual assault cases are reported.
2. Trump was publicly accused of sexual harassment or rape at least 6 times prior to the recent release of a recording in which he appeared to brag about sexually assaulting women; often the alleged behavior was very similar to the behavior Trump described on tape. He is also recorded making sexual comments about at least 3 separate underage girls, as well as bragging about walking in on pageant contestants as they were changing--something he was alleged to do by recent accusers.
3. You'll probably need probable cause and a warrant to check anyone's bank accounts.
 
S

Scanner

Guest
EatTheRich said:
Women have been publicly accusing Trump of sexual assaults and rapes, often strikingly similar to those described by Trump himself on the Access Hollywood tape, since at least 1989. Whenever a woman came forward over the years, Trump stopped at nothing to ruin her life--as he's consistently done with everyone who's stood in his way in business, politics, and personal life. Now they are coming forward because Trump's recorded admission gives their accusations credibility, and because there is safety in numbers. We saw the same thing with Bill Cosby.

Gennifer Flowers engaged in a consensual affair with Clinton. A virulently anti-Clinton special prosecutor conducting an open-ended, high-budget witch hunt was not able to find enough evidence of Paula Jones's allegations (which even if true would not constitute a violation of the country's sexist laws--unlike groping a woman without her consent--which included provably false claims that Clinton's penis was bent, and which were deliberately employed as a means to entrap Clinton regarding his consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky) or Juanita Broaddrick's allegations (which was denied in a sworn affidavit). Does that mean that he is definitely not guilty? Of course not. But the mere existence of accusations against him does not make Donald Trump--against whom there is far more evidence--an acceptable candidate for president. At most, it means that William Jefferson Clinton (who is not running this year) is also an unacceptable candidate for president.
Click to expand...
From YOUR LINK >>

. 1. "Ivana has since come out denying the incident"

2. told The New York Times on Wednesday

3. Jill Harth dropped the suit against Trump. Of course she never had anything other thn a money grab against a guy with a lot of money. No criminal charge ever filed.

4. Jane Doe - "allegation of all, filed in June this year,

5. Temple Taggart McDowell - only speaking out NOW - October 2016

6. McGillivray told The Palm Beach Post on Wednesday, that in 2003

7. Rachel Crooks - like all the others she talked to the New York times - but ONLY NOW in October 2016

8. Natasha Stoynoff - same as Rachel crooks and all the others. Said nothing for years. No criminal complaint.

9. "This week, Seattle’s KING-TV reports"

HA HA HA. All of this just confirms what I said previously. These women said nothing for years, made no criminal complaint, but all of a sudden when Trump is running for president, 3 weeks before the election, here they are (looking to score big $$$ by extorting Trump, or being paid off by the Democrats) Ho hum. Yawn**** :rolleyes:
 
S

Scanner

Guest
HA HA HA. Look at the OP's >> "Trump's behavior"

Like we're actually going to believe all this poppycock scam ? :rolleyes:

Flimsiest pile of BS, seen in a long time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top