Given that every single attempt to show substantial election fraud made by you or any of the other Trumplicans here has been decisively destroyed by facts...Still pretending he didn't ?
Trump lost. Proven time and time again.
Given that every single attempt to show substantial election fraud made by you or any of the other Trumplicans here has been decisively destroyed by facts...Still pretending he didn't ?
Nice try. Read the memo's again and point out the illegal part.It was an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding by causing a riot.
With your demonstrated reading comprehension what did that gain you?I have read the opinions of judges, both republican and democrat...who have evaluated the "evidence" presented by Trump's legal team. Have you?
There were no alternate electors....pretending there were or suggesting people appoint themselves electors would have been illegal. The states themselves run their elections based on their own constitutions. Each of the seven states referenced as battleground states mandate that a slate of electors is picked by the popular vote and each of those states had already sent their electors to congress to be counted.Illegal? How so?
What was illegal in the memos? Nothing. A law school student might write those memos as hypotheticals for a real legal process meant to validate the electoral pocess. People are allowed to object. It is why the whole process is set up. Alternate electors have been sent before in history (if I recollect right).There were no alternate electors....pretending there were or suggesting people appoint themselves electors would have been illegal. The states themselves run their elections based on their own constitutions. Each of the seven states referenced as battleground states mandate that a slate of electors is picked by the popular vote and each of those states had already sent their electors to congress to be counted.
The Trump team was behind the people who filed false certificates and there are investigations into those who filed the fraudulent documents.
Backgrounder on Alternate Electors Scheme: Federal and State Criminal Investigations, and Civil Suits
Information on federal and state criminal laws that might apply to false alternate electors plan in 2020 election, and ongoing litigation.www.justsecurity.org
What does this opinion on tossing out the Trump lawsuit mean to you?With your demonstrated reading comprehension what did that gain you?
Giuliani coordinated the "alternate electors" efforts to file fraudulent certificates. I posted a link to a legal assessment of laws broken by the attempt.What was illegal in the memos? Nothing. A law school student might write those memos as hypotheticals for a real legal process meant to validate the electoral pocess. People are allowed to object. It is why the whole process is set up. Alternate electors have been sent before in history (if I recollect right).
Why are you changing the subject? This is about a couple of legal memos you erroneously claim are illegal/criminal.Giuliani coordinated the "alternate electors" efforts to file fraudulent certificates. I posted a link to a legal assessment of laws broken by the attempt.
The memos were part and parcel of an illegal act.Why are you changing the subject? This is about a couple of legal memos you erroneously claim are illegal/criminal.
What about the part where he called for Pence and others to in multiple ways “break with the procedure set out in the [Electoral Count] Act”?Nice try. Read the memo's again and point out the illegal part.
What about it? It remains a legal outline of how to proceed to contest an election at the last procedural event in the process, right?What about the part where he called for Pence and others to in multiple ways “break with the procedure set out in the [Electoral Count] Act”?
By breaking the law, yes? To “break with the procedure set out in” the law means to break the law. And it was discussed that creating “chaos” on January 6 would help them get away with doing so.What about it? It remains a legal outline of how to proceed to contest an election at the last procedural event in the process, right?
I printed the memos I found. No word "chaos".By breaking the law, yes? To “break with the procedure set out in” the law means to break the law. And it was discussed that creating “chaos” on January 6 would help them get away with doing so.
Not in the memos. But the plan to create chaos forms the backdrop for the memos and the rest of the coup attempt.I printed the memos I found. No word "chaos".
YOU quoted "chaos". Find me that.Not in the memos. But the plan to create chaos forms the backdrop for the memos and the rest of the coup attempt.
I'm looking for the memo quote regarding "chaos"?
I'm looking for your evidence that the election was stolen.I'm looking for the memo quote regarding "chaos"?
I've given you links to state testimony, to videos, to a documentary... and contrary to your assertion that you have debunked things you haven't.I'm looking for your evidence that the election was stolen.