New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

German liberals send 93 year old woman to prison for questioning the Holocaust

This is what dictatorship look like. Merely questioning the gover-media version of history and they lock you up. Liberals hate free speech.

https://newsrnd.com/life/2022-08-19-ursula-haverbeck--the-verdict-is-final---the-charge-to-begin-the-sentence-is-expected-to-be-in-the-fall.S1O9CzpR9.html

aug 19 2022 Ursula Haverbeck was sentenced to one year in prison for hate speech. The decision is now final. The 93-year-old is due to start her sentence soon.

In 2016 Haverbeck had claimed in a public lecture and in 2018 in an interview published on the Internet that the Holocaust did not exist.

In April 2022, she was sentenced to a total of one year in prison for sedition.

The revision of the defense was unsuccessful.

Despite her old age, the chamber ruled out a suspended sentence because Haverbeck had shown no insight or remorse.

The presiding judge of the Berlin Regional Court stated in the pronouncement of the verdict that there was “no alternative” to imprisonment.
 
Last edited:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
This is what dictatorship look like. Merely questioning the gover-media version of history and they lock you up. Liberals hate free speech.

https://newsrnd.com/life/2022-08-19-ursula-haverbeck--the-verdict-is-final---the-charge-to-begin-the-sentence-is-expected-to-be-in-the-fall.S1O9CzpR9.html

aug 19 2022 Ursula Haverbeck was sentenced to one year in prison for hate speech. The decision is now final. The 93-year-old is due to start her sentence soon.

In 2016 Haverbeck had claimed in a public lecture and in 2018 in an interview published on the Internet that the Holocaust did not exist.

In April 2022, she was sentenced to a total of one year in prison for sedition.

The revision of the defense was unsuccessful.

Despite her old age, the chamber ruled out a suspended sentence because Haverbeck had shown no insight or remorse.

The presiding judge of the Berlin Regional Court stated in the pronouncement of the verdict that there was “no alternative” to imprisonment.
Why would you defend the indefensible? The German law passed after WWII was intended to prevent the white washing of the Nazi party and regime. Haverbeck knew she was breaking that law. Obviously the country that perpetrated mass murder has moved to insure they do not see a return to fascism.
 
Top